[Congressional Record Volume 151, Number 92 (Monday, July 11, 2005)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1453]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




   EXPRESSING THE GRAVE DISAPPROVAL OF THE HOUSE REGARDING MAJORITY 
         OPINION OF SUPREME COURT IN KELO V. CITY OF NEW LONDON

                                 ______
                                 

                               speech of

                            HON. JAY INSLEE

                             of washington

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, June 30, 2005

  Mr. INSLEE. Mr. Speaker, today I voice my opposition to the Supreme 
Court's recent decision granting local governments the power to seize 
private property for economic development. The Constitution protects an 
individual's right to own a home free of government intervention, and 
ensures just compensation for any property taken in the name of the 
greater public good, such as vitally necessary roads or water projects. 
The Court erred in its determination that private development interests 
constitute a legitimate public good. Private interests should not 
justify the bull-dozing of homes in a working-class neighborhood. This 
divided decision, Kelo v. New London, may represent an open invitation 
for abuse by local governments and private developers at the expense of 
hardworking Americans who have a right to their property. While I 
oppose the Supreme Court's decision, I also believe in the separation 
of powers and do not believe it is appropriate for Congress to seek to 
punish the Court for its decision. It is my hope that the Supreme Court 
has another opportunity to correct this bad decision, and provide 
greater protections for homeowners.

                          ____________________