[Congressional Record Volume 151, Number 66 (Wednesday, May 18, 2005)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5433-S5434]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
VICARIOUS LIABILITY REFORM
Mr. SANTORUM. Mr. President, being mindful of yesterday's passage of
SAFETEA, I rise to speak to an issue that was not addressed in the
Senate bill. This is an area of the legal system needing reform that
affects interstate commerce in the transportation sector--vicarious
liability. These types of laws exist in only a handful of States where
nonnegligent owners of rented and leased vehicles are liable for the
actions of vehicle operators.
Although a vehicle renting or leasing company may take every
precaution to ensure that a vehicle is in optimal operating condition
and meets every safety standard, these companies can still be subject
to costly lawsuits due to the actions of the vehicle's operator, over
which the company has no control. Under these laws, leasing or rental
companies can be liable simply because they are the owner of the
vehicle.
Though only a few States enforce laws that threaten nonnegligent
companies with unlimited vicarious liability, they affect consumers and
businesses from all 50 States. Vicarious liability means higher
consumer costs in acquiring vehicles and buying insurance and means
higher commercial costs for the transportation of goods. Left
unreformed, these laws could have a devastating, effect on an
increasing number of small businesses that have done nothing wrong.
The House acted in H.R. 3 to address these unfair laws by creating a
uniform standard to exclude nonnegligent vehicle renting and leasing
companies from liability for the actions of a customer operating a safe
vehicle. Under this provision, States would continue to determine the
level of compensation available for accident victims by setting minimum
insurance coverage requirements for every vehicle. Vicarious liability
reform would not protect companies that have been negligent in
[[Page S5434]]
their renting or leasing practices or in the care of the vehicle. This
provision is a common sense reform that holds vehicle operators
accountable for their own actions and does not unfairly punish owners
who have done nothing wrong.
Unfortunately, the Senate bill does not contain this important
reform. I urge my colleagues. to consider the merits of this provision
and retain the House-passed language in the conference bill.
____________________