[Congressional Record Volume 151, Number 66 (Wednesday, May 18, 2005)]
[Senate]
[Page S5433]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
HEALTH CARE
Mr. SANTORUM. Mr. President, at a time when the importance of the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration is highlighted by concerns over the
safety of pharmaceuticals, it would be foolish to move forward with
importation policies that would circumvent the safety regulations of
the FDA. I want to take this opportunity to highlight a recent
international Internet pharma-trafficking network that was shut down in
Philadelphia, which I strongly believe provides a very accurate, and
disturbing, window on what exactly a prescription drug importation
scheme would mean for Americans.
On April 20, 2005, the Department of Justice announced the unsealing
of an indictment returned by a Federal grand jury on April 6, 2005. The
indictment chronicled how the ``Bansal Organization'' used the Internet
to fill orders for pharmaceuticals. In turn, this crime ring
facilitated millions of un-prescribed pills coming into the United
States--of which the bio-efficacy and the safety have yet to be
determined--to consumers who only needed a credit card. These drugs
included potentially dangerous narcotics, such as codine and Valium,
drugs that can cause serious harm if not taken under a physician's
supervision, and which have been highlighted repeatedly as drugs that
pose special concerns as we debate possible importation.
Stretching from America to countries such as India, Antigua, and
Singapore, officials estimate that this international conspiracy
provided $20 million worth of un-prescribed drugs to hundreds of
thousands of people worldwide--most if not all of whom had no idea
where their drugs originated. This drug scam exemplifies how the
Internet can be a door to an unregulated world of just about any kind
of pharmaceutical--including counterfeits and potentially dangerous
narcotics. This is particularly concerning given the growing ease at
which prescription drugs can be purchased over the Internet.
At the heart of the debate on foreign importation of prescription
drugs is the concern over the cost of prescription drugs. Often
proponents claim that importation would allow Americans access to other
countries' drugs at a cheaper price, despite thorough analysis by the
U.S. Health and Human Services Task Force on Prescription Drug
Importation. The HHS Task Force reported that any associated cost
savings with importation would be negated by the costs associated with
constructing and attempting to safely maintain such a system, and
ultimately concluded what both past and current Administrations have
found: the safety of imported drugs purchased by individuals, via the
Internet or other means, cannot be guaranteed. Moreover, generic
prescription drugs in America are on average 50 percent less than their
foreign counterparts. This holds true in the case of the ``Bansal
Organization,'' in which the vast majority of the trafficked drugs were
sold at prices higher than what a consumer would have paid at a
legitimate pharmacy. The safety of the American drug supply should not
be sacrificed for supposed savings. Those that continue to purport that
importation would provide cheaper drugs are misleading the American
people, and as a result putting their health and lives at risk.
Importation will not equate to cheaper drugs for Americans, but it
will lead to an explosion of opportunities for counterfeiters to take
advantage of the American people by compromising the safety of our drug
supply. Many individuals, both patients and healthcare professionals,
who testified during the HHS Task Force's proceedings expressed
significant concerns that importation would compromise the integrity of
the American drug supply by creating a vehicle through which terrorists
could easily introduce harmful agents in the United States. Recall that
in 1982, seven Americans died after ingesting Tylenol laced with
cyanide. More recently, in July 2003 members of a Florida-based drug-
counterfeiting ring who sold and diluted counterfeited drugs were
indicted, and 18 million tablets of counterfeit Lipitor were recalled
after evidence revealed that this popular anti-cholesterol drug had
been manufactured overseas and repackaged in the United States to hide
the deception. Importation would provide for any of these acts to be
committed on a larger, exponentially more devastating, national scale.
To put this in perspective, in 2003, 69 million prescriptions were
written for Lipitor in the United States alone.
The ``Bansal Organization'' bust is but the latest in a series of
illicit pharmaceutical trafficking scams, which are extremely
lucrative, and which our law enforcement officials are already
struggling to combat on a daily basis. Why would we elect to open the
door to importation when we know that doing so will create infinite
opportunities to compromise the safety of our drug supply?
As we continue to debate the best ways to ensure that Americans have
access to the highest quality, affordable prescription drugs, I would
caution my colleagues that importation is not the answer. It would be
unconscionable to facilitate in any way the dangerous shortcuts
utilized in the Philadelphia drug scam--shortcuts that circumvent the
essential ongoing patient relationship with physicians and other
licensed professionals trained to monitor potential medication
interactions and side effects that can lead to serious injury and/or
death.
Congress should uphold the strong regulatory standards on drug safety
that exist today, and not open our borders to prescription drugs from a
world of unknown sources.
____________________