[Congressional Record Volume 151, Number 57 (Wednesday, May 4, 2005)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E870-E871]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




 REINTRODUCTION OF BILL TO FACILITATE ACQUISITION OF MINERAL RIGHTS AT 
                              ROCKY FLATS

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. MARK UDALL

                              of colorado

                    in the house of representatives

                         Wednesday, May 4, 2005

  Mr. UDALL of Colorado. Mr. Speaker, I am today reintroducing a bill 
to facilitate the acquisition by the federal government of mineral 
rights or other non-Federal interests in lands that are located within 
the boundaries of the Rocky Flats site in Colorado.
  The bill is cosponsored by my Colorado colleague, Representative 
Beauprez. It is identical to a bill we cosponsored in the 108th 
Congress.


                               background

  In the 1950s, the Federal Government bought land at Rocky Flats for 
use as a production facility for nuclear-weapon components. However, 
the purchase did not include all the mineral rights, some of which 
remained in private ownership.
  Production at Rocky Flats ended more than a decade ago. Since then, 
the Department of Energy, through its contractors, has been working to 
have the site cleaned up and closed.


                    rocky flats wildlife refuge act

  In 2001, Congress passed legislation I sponsored with Senator Wayne 
Allard to guide the future of Rocky Flats. Under that legislation--the 
Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge Act of 2001--once the cleanup and 
closure are accomplished, most of the land at Rocky Flats will be 
transferred from the Department of Energy to the Department of the 
Interior and will be managed as a unit of the National Wildlife Refuge 
System.
  The refuge act includes some provisions related to the non-Federal 
minerals--primarily sand and gravel--at Rocky Flats. It says ``nothing 
in this [law] limits any valid, existing . . . mineral right'' except 
for ``such reasonable conditions on access . . . as are appropriate for 
the cleanup and closure of Rocky Flats and for the management of the 
refuge.'' And it says that a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between 
DOE and Interior is to ``address the impacts'' mineral rights ``may 
have on the management of the refuge, and provide strategies for 
resolving or mitigating these impacts.''
  These provisions were included in the refuge act in order to make 
clear that while these mineral rights are to be respected as private 
property, future development of the minerals could have adverse effects 
on the land, wildlife habitat, and other values of the future wildlife 
refuge. That is why Congress directed the agencies to consider these 
potential future effects and work to find ways to mitigate those 
impacts.
  So far, however, the Energy and Interior Departments have not been 
able to agree on what to do about the minerals.
  I think the best way to handle this would be for the federal 
government to acquire the minerals. However, neither DOE nor Interior 
has made this a priority, and the current budgetary situation places 
constraints on such acquisitions.


                          purpose of the bill

  The Udall-Beauprez bill is intended to make it more feasible for the 
Interior Department to acquire some or all of the minerals. It would do 
that by giving the Secretary of the Interior two additional methods 
(either instead of or in addition to purchase for cash) for completing 
such acquisitions--
  (1) by giving ``credits'' that could be used instead of cash to pay 
for oil and gas leases on the Outer Continental Shelf; and
  (2) by allowing federal lands or minerals anywhere in the country to 
be exchanged for the Rocky Flats minerals (under current law, such 
exchanges can only occur within the same state--Colorado lands/minerals 
for other Colorado lands/minerals).
  The bill has no compulsory provisions. It would not require that any 
of the non-Federal interests at Rocky Flats be acquired by the 
government. It also would not require anyone to accept anything other 
than cash for any interests that the government may acquire--any 
transaction involving the new ``credits'' or any exchange could take 
place only with the concurrence of the party selling minerals to the 
United States. It would merely provide the Interior Department with new 
tools--in addition to those it already has--for such acquisitions.
  In addition, the bill includes a provision to make clear that the 
Federal government cannot expand the Rocky Flats site by obtaining any 
non-Federal lands or interests in lands that are outside the site's 
boundaries except with the consent of the owners of those lands or 
interests.
  In developing the original bill, I sought and obtained technical 
assistance from the Interior Department, gave careful consideration to 
comments from local governments and others in Colorado, and made 
revisions to earlier drafts of the legislation in response to points 
raised in those comments.
  Mr. Speaker, this bill--the ``Rocky Flats Minerals Acquisition 
Act''--is narrow in scope. However, I think it can assist in successful 
implementation of something that is very important for all Coloradans--
the establishment of the Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge. I think 
it deserves the support of every Member of the House.
  For the information of our colleagues, here is a short outline of the 
revised bill:

            Outline of Rocky Flats Minerals Acquisition Bill


                               background

       When the ongoing cleanup of the Rocky Flats site is 
     completed, it will be closed and most of the site will be 
     transferred to the Interior Department for management as a 
     National Wildlife Refuge. Within the site's boundaries there 
     are some privately-owned mineral rights (primarily sand and 
     gravel). Federal acquisition of at least some of these 
     mineral rights would further sound management of the site as 
     a wildlife refuge. However, the current budgetary situation 
     makes it difficult to complete such acquisition.
       The purpose of the bill is to provide the Interior 
     Department with two additional tools to assist in the 
     acquisition of mineral rights or other non-Federal property 
     at Rocky Flats: authority to provide ``credits'' (instead of 
     or in addition to cash) that could be

[[Page E871]]

     used for bonus bids or royalties for mineral leases on the 
     Outer Continental Shelf; and authority to provide eligible 
     BLM lands (or interests) anywhere in the country in 
     exchange for the interests acquired at Rocky Flats 
     (waiving the current requirement that exchanges must be 
     within the same state).


                       SECTION-BY-SECTION OUTLINE

       Section 1--
       (1) provides a short title: ``Rocky Flats Minerals 
     Acquisition Act.''
       (2) includes findings regarding the status of Rocky Flats 
     and the desirability of federal acquisition of mineral 
     interests within its boundaries
       (3) states the bill's purpose as being to facilitate 
     acquisition of non-Federal interests at Rocky Flats by 
     authorizing the Interior Department to use credits or 
     interests in certain public lands--provided that the owners 
     of the acquired lands or interests concur--instead of or in 
     addition to cash.
       Section 2--
       (1) authorizes the Interior Department to use appropriated 
     funds, credits (with the concurrence of the party 
     transferring lands or interests to the United States), 
     exchanged lands or interests therein, or any combination of 
     these, to acquire mineral interests or other non-Federal 
     interests at Rocky Flats,
       (2) defines ``credits,'' making clear that they can only be 
     used for bonus bids or royalty payments for oil or gas leases 
     on the Outer Continental Shelf, can be transferred, and must 
     be used within 10 years of their issuance;
       (3) specifies that while exchanges can involve BLM lands or 
     interests in any State, only lands or interests identified as 
     suitable for disposal under current law can be transferred to 
     private ownership through such an exchange;
       (4) specifies that no lands or interests therein outside 
     the exterior boundaries of Rocky Flats can be acquired by the 
     United States for the purposes of the Rocky Flats National 
     Wildlife Refuge Act except with the consent of the owners of 
     such lands or interests.
       (5) provides that interests acquired by the United States 
     under the bill will be managed as part of the wildlife refuge 
     and cannot be developed or transferred out of Federal 
     ownership; and
       (6) specifies that the bill adds to the Interior 
     Department's existing authority and does not reduce any 
     authority the Department already has.

                          ____________________