[Congressional Record Volume 151, Number 54 (Thursday, April 28, 2005)]
[House]
[Pages H2721-H2722]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE CLEAR ACT OF 2005 AND THE MINUTEMEN
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Norwood) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. NORWOOD. Madam Speaker, this month the Minuteman Project has
accomplished with just a few hundred citizen volunteers what the
Federal Government has been unable to do and actually told us was
impossible to do, and that is stopping illegal immigrants crossing our
borders.
In the process of focusing the Nation's attention on the insecurity
of our borders, they have succeeded in bringing new information to the
debate on the overall immigration crisis in this Nation. The new
information is critical to this body's consideration of a specific
policy area, probably and frankly the one area in which all Americans
should be in 100 percent agreement, and that is protecting Americans
from criminal illegal immigrants.
U.S. Border Patrol Sector Chief Michael Nicely is head of the entire
260 mile long Tucson Sector of our border, the worst in the Nation for
illegal immigration, and the same sector where the Minutemen shutdown a
23 mile portion of that sector.
What should be horrifying to all Americans is what Chief Nicely told
Government Executive Magazine just last week. He says that since
November, the Border Patrol agents have caught 17,000 criminal illegal
aliens trying to enter our country through just through this one 260
mile sector; 17,000 criminal illegal aliens. That is not total illegal
aliens now, just the criminals. Overall, Chief Nicely's sector has
arrested more than a quarter of a million people trying to enter this
country illegally just since Thanksgiving.
Last year, I introduced legislation specifically targeting against
criminal illegal aliens. The Clear Law Enforcement For Criminal Aliens
Removal
[[Page H2722]]
Act, or we call it the CLEAR Act, gained the support of some 125
Members. Our purpose is fairly simple: State and local law enforcement
personnel would be fully authorized to investigate, apprehend, and, if
necessary, remove criminal aliens in the United States.
Already this year our Justice Department has asked for help from
local law enforcement on this issue. According to Reuters News, the
Bush administration now recognizes that, ``The United States has freed
numerous illegal aliens into the community who are dangerous murderers,
rapists and child molesters under a legal loophole created by Supreme
Court decisions, and that ``Congress should urgently pass legislation
to close this loophole, which has already resulted in the release of
several extremely violent offenders, with others scheduled to be
released soon.''
According to the report, U.S. Justice Department Deputy Assistant
Attorney General Jonathan Cohn made this request of the Committee on
the Judiciary of the House of Representatives on March 14.
We have the legislative draft to do just what they want, this year's
pending version of the CLEAR Act. We plan to introduce the 2005 version
within the next few weeks. We do welcome constructive input from the
administration, from Members of both parties and members of both
houses. But from what we have learned thus far from the Minuteman
Project, the CLEAR Act cannot be a stand-alone remedy for stopping the
hordes of vicious foreign criminals invading our country to murder,
rape and molest Americans.
My one bill will not do it, not by itself. We can provide local and
State law enforcement with the tools to remove these criminal elements
through guaranteed deportation. We can help Homeland Security do their
job. But it does little if they can simply pour back across unsecured
borders. You have gotten nothing done.
The CLEAR Act, therefore, will become a critical component of overall
immigration and border reform. I urge every Member in this body to join
in this effort with the CLEAR Act. In return, I pledge to support
whatever legislative measures that are necessary to secure our borders.
That includes a total military closing, if necessary, to stop these
criminals. I fully understand the meaning of ``closing,'' even if it is
a temporary closing. It is a time we in this body are going to be able
to declare whose side are we on.
{time} 2115
Are we on the side of fellow Americans, or are we on the side of
those of the new world order who want no borders? It is that simple.
The vote will come down to just that.
____________________