[Congressional Record Volume 151, Number 52 (Tuesday, April 26, 2005)]
[House]
[Page H2532]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
WHY DO THEY HATE US?
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Washington (Mr. McDermott) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. McDERMOTT. Mr. Speaker, the great unanswered question of the 21st
century is, why do they hate us?
We have to find out. The answer relates directly to the safety and
security of America and every American, wherever we live.
Why does the world not see us the way we see ourselves? Strong,
generous, eager to share what makes us unique. ``We hold these truths
to be self evident.''
Why? Why can they not perceive the America that we know?
Well, several incidents recently give us clues as to the riddle of
why the world cannot except our raison d'etre.
A few weeks ago we strongly objected to the Japanese government's
effort to establish a contract with Iran for much-needed energy. We
told them do not do it.
This is the continuation of a quarter-of-a-century-old foreign policy
initiative: isolate Iran; that will force them to bend to our will.
But Iran is rich in resources, and I think the conclusion follows
naturally from these circumstances. When it comes to Iran, economic
isolation equals nuclear proliferation.
Attempting to curb, stifle, or choke off the natural economic
progress of a nation with supplies very much in demand is unlikely to
be effective. It certainly has not worked for a quarter of a century,
no matter which party has had the White House.
Iran is a nation rich in natural energy resources which some nations
will seek to leverage regardless of what U.S. policy is.
Today, 14 percent of China's energy needs are met with energy
resources from Iran. No one should doubt the obvious. This energy
relationship will go on in coming years.
We lean on Japan, but that has no impact on China or Russia or others
in the region. If anything, it is an incentive for Iran to deepen its
economic and political ties elsewhere.
In attempting to isolate Iran, we may be, in the end, isolating
ourselves from the seemingly unstoppable economic and geopolitical
expansion in Asia and the Middle East.
A few days after we expressed our extreme concerns to Japan,
something happened that did not receive widespread news coverage in the
United States. Last year, Japan financed the equivalent of the entire
U.S. deficit, $400 billion.
Now, some in Japan have expressed a preference for the Euro. Japan is
our friend, a strong and close ally. It seems to me if our friends are
struggling with our foreign policy decisions, imagine what our
nonfriends are doing. They are using it to isolate the U.S. from the
rest of the world.
Not long after our concerns were expressed to Japan, we showed the
iron fist again when Iran, Pakistan, and India began to talk of a
pipeline for South Asia across Pakistan to supply energy to starved
West India.
The President has defined Iran as the Axis of Evil. The U.S., to put
it diplomatically, prefers to end the religious government in Iran
where we might change the rhetoric from the Axis of Evil to the access,
A-C-C-E-S-S to natural resources.
Our vocal and public expressions against the Iranian Government were
noticed. Iran's leaders took a page out of our playbook. We call them
the Axis of Evil. They call us the Great Satan.
Lately, the administration has ramped up on the nuclear weapons of
mass destruction rhetoric, leaving some to fear or speculate about
whether the rhetoric is really the base case for a new preemptive
action.
One hears Condoleezza Rice threatening sanctions against those who
engage in commerce in Iran. It just so happened that entire nations
like India and Pakistan fall into that rhetorical trap.
A proposal to build a pipeline from Iran through Pakistan to serve
energy needs in India has been called a peace pipeline. It is the
latest positive step between two great nations with a long history of
tension and bloodshed.
If the IRA and Northern Ireland can resolve differences, surely there
is hope for Kashmir. The signs of hope are there; but like a seed
planted in fertile ground, the hope for lasting peace must be nurtured.
Instead, our one-size-fits-all foreign policy aimed at Iran hits
India and Pakistan as well. We end up trying to punish Iran by
undercutting India and Pakistan.
India's energy problems are real. The future of the nation depends on
securing stable energy resources. Yet, U.S. foreign policy meant to
punish Iran hurts America's friends and America's foreign policy.
We are telling India and Pakistan to abandon the peace pipeline
because we do not like Iran. But we are saying there will be severe
consequences for our friends if they do not follow our orders.
Why are we trying to prevent India from solving one of its most
pressing energy problems, chronic energy shortage?
We have not isolated Iran. We have merely strongly encouraged Iran to
build economic and political relationships everywhere else. We like to
pretend our effort in Iran has been effective. I think it is time for
us to admit we need a complete reassessment and overhaul of our failing
foreign policy beginning in Iran.
In my judgment, it is time to put economic democracy on the table,
and there is no place like starting with India and Pakistan.
Their destiny should be in the hands of Indians and Pakistanis. The
Administration has been declaring veto power.
Iran, Cuba, and a host of other foreign policy initiatives have shown
us that this approach does not work. And our intention to approve or
veto the destiny of other nations will not last.
I worry about Iran as much as any Republican and Democrat leader.
But we cannot deny what we know to be true. Our current foreign
policy--in philosophy and practice--has been most effective at
isolating America.
It's time we revise our vision to something sustainable and
tolerable.
We can start by encouraging regional cooperation in Central and South
Asia. We can start by encouraging peace, perhaps symbolized by the so
called peace pipeline. We have helped Iran win many friends in recent
years.
Now it is time to envision a foreign policy which makes it more
likely that Iran, the world's second largest holder of natural gas,
will focus on developing natural gas instead of nuclear energy that
could form the basis for a nuclear threat.
Surely, our experience in Iraq and its problems should have taught us
something about the ultimate futility of trying to solve everything
with a gun.
____________________