[Congressional Record Volume 151, Number 33 (Thursday, March 17, 2005)]
[Senate]
[Page S2981]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




          ANTI-SECESSION LAW OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

  Mr. ROCKEFELLER. Mr. President, on March 14 the National Congress of 
the People's Republic of China passed a bill termed the ``Anti-
Secession'' law that preemptively positions China to take military 
action should it judge Taiwan to be moving toward formal independence. 
While the threat of force from Beijing is not new, legislation that 
refers to ``non-peaceful means,'' even described as a ``last resort'' 
can only be seen as counterproductive. At a minimum, it is not 
conducive to building confidence between Taiwan and China nor 
facilitating dialogue, which are key to future stability in the straits 
and to peace and prosperity for both sides. This is not an issue that 
can be successfully resolved through military means. All would lose.
  The timing of this law is equally unfortunate. Since the beginning of 
this year, Chinese and Taiwanese officials have taken concrete, 
pragmatic steps to build better relations--such as direct flights, 
shipping links, and increased trade. There have also been gestures of 
personal respect and there has been a lowering of the rhetorical 
temperature, on both sides. These are heartening developments. I 
encourage both parties to seek to expand upon them. I am convinced that 
this is the right road for China and Taiwan, to focus on mutually 
beneficial programs and to continue to create opportunities for more 
personal contacts.
  In contrast, the Anti-Secession law is awkward and unhelpful. While I 
recognize that it also does stress the chance for peaceful settlement 
of the Taiwan issue, its thrust, coupled with an ongoing Chinese 
military build-up, will be viewed by Taiwan as inimical. I urge the 
Chinese government to move beyond this legislation, and this moment, 
and to demonstrate its good faith intent to work toward renewed 
discussions and better relations. If Beijing does so, certainly I hope 
that Taipei will respond in kind.

                          ____________________