[Congressional Record Volume 151, Number 21 (Tuesday, March 1, 2005)]
[House]
[Pages H812-H813]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
SMART SECURITY AND THE UNVARNISHED TRUTH ABOUT IRAQ
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mrs. Biggert). Under a previous order of the
House, the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Woolsey) is recognized for
5 minutes.
Ms. WOOLSEY. Madam Speaker, there are many truths about America's
involvement in Iraq. My truth is that our policies there over the last
2 years have been both immoral and ineffective. With nearly 1,500
American troops killed since the fighting began and another 11,000
injured, the time has come for a drastic change in our role in Iraq.
Leave aside, if my colleagues possibly can, the fact that the
President and his team misled us about weapons of mass destruction.
Forget for a moment, if they can, that they invented out of whole cloth
a link between Saddam Hussein and the 9/11 tragedy. Those lives were
bad enough. But their policies, the administration's policies, have
also failed to achieve one of their later stated objectives of securing
Iraq. The Bush administration is not only dishonest; I believe they are
incompetent.
Rather than liberating Iraq, the U.S. invasion and occupation has
trapped the nation and its people in a cauldron of violent civil
strife. Our presence there has not engendered gratitude but bred
resentment in the form of vicious insurgency. It has emboldened Muslim
extremists who hate America now more than ever. Neither Iraqis nor
Americans nor anyone else in this world is safer because of this war in
Iraq.
In fact, a report came from the CIA's National Intelligence Council
that concluded Iraq has replaced Afghanistan as the most fertile
breeding ground for terrorists. It turns out that the Bush
administration was right in their projection that we cannot separate
Iraq from the war on terrorism. What they did not tell us is that
invading Iraq fulfilled those projections and strengthened the wrong
side in the war on terrorism.
Even since the Iraqi election, violence is making democracy a real
long shot; and our troops, charged with somehow bringing order to the
chaotic situation, are sitting ducks. Perhaps the President should ask
the Iraqi people how free they feel when they must dodge bullets just
to go to the market or visit a neighbor, when they stand by and watch
neighborhoods being destroyed. Even in Afghanistan, which is often
cited as a Bush success, there is evidence that the country is being
run by warlords and drug dealers.
To help the situation in Iraq, I have introduced H. Con. Res. 35,
legislation
[[Page H813]]
that will help secure Iraq by withdrawing our troops, which will ensure
that America's role in Iraq actually does make America safer. So far 27
of my House colleagues have joined me as co-sponsors of this important
legislation.
My plan for Iraq is part of a larger strategy that I call SMART
Security, which is a Sensible, Multilateral American Response to
Terrorism that will ensure America's security by relying on smarter
policies.
Madam Speaker, let me be clear. We would not abandon Iraq and we
should not. There is still a critical role for the United States in
providing the developmental aid that can help recreate a robust civil
society, build schools and water processing plants, and ensure that
Iraq's economic infrastructure becomes fully viable.
Instead of troops, we need to send scientists, educators, urban
planners, and constitutional experts to help rebuild Iraq's fighting
economic and physical infrastructure and help establish a robust and
democratic civil society. We need to pursue a new approach, and we need
to do that because it has become clear the military option is not
working. That is not the ideological statement of someone who opposed
the war on principle, though I am that. It is a sober assessment of the
situation in Iraq that is now shared across the political spectrum. We
must truly support our troops, and the right way to do this is by
bringing them home.
____________________