[Congressional Record Volume 151, Number 18 (Thursday, February 17, 2005)]
[House]
[Pages H757-H758]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
REINING IN THE COST OF MEDICARE PRESCRIPTION DRUG ENTITLEMENT
(Mr. FLAKE asked and was given permission to address the House for 1
minute.)
Mr. FLAKE. Mr. Speaker, last week we heard projections that the
prescription drug benefit is going to be far more expensive than we
figured. Now, many of us never believed that it would cost just $400
million, and the fact that it is much higher than that is not
surprising at all.
I would encourage the President and our leadership to work with us to
be able to rein in this monster that we have created.
Over a period of 75 years, the initial estimates were that this would
add $7 trillion in unfunded liabilities. I should point out that every
dime to pay for this new benefit is borrowed. Therefore, every dime
will be paid for by our kids and our grandkids.
It is time to get the bridle on the horse before the horse leaves the
barn, and we need to work now, before this benefit starts next year, to
make sure that we can reign in the costs.
Mr. Speaker, last week the White House released budget projections
that show that the cost of the prescription drug benefit that Congress
added to Medicare last year could balloon to $1.2 trillion over the
next ten years. The initial price estimate of the new entitlement was
$400 billion.
Frankly, the initial estimate of $400 billion was more than many of
us could stomach, but we knew that $400 billion was a lowball estimate
and the real cost was sure to be higher. Having said that, it gives
none of us pleasure to say ``see, we told you so. ``
When President Bush first proposed the new prescription drug benefit,
it was targeted and means-tested for low-income seniors who did not
currently have prescription drug coverage. President Bush's plan also
coupled the new benefit with some needed reforms of the Medicare
program.
It should come as no surprise that by the time Congress was done with
the package, it looked nothing like the President's proposal. Congress
expanded coverage to all seniors and yanked the reforms that would have
helped curb future costs from the bill.
What does come as a surprise is President Bush's recent threat to
veto any attempt by Congress to go back and fix our mistake.
Shortly after Congress passed the new prescription drug entitlement,
and the initial cost estimate was already going up, I introduced a bill
that would cap the cost of the program at the initial estimate of $400
billion. If the cost overran the estimate, my bill would have required
Congress to offset the difference or scale back the entitlement.
I plan to reintroduce that legislation shortly, and I urge Congress
to take it up quickly. Whether or not Congress acts on this specific
piece of legislation, we need to begin talking about ways to control
the monster we created.
President Bush sent over a budget to Congress a couple of weeks ago
that proposed cutting or killing over 150 programs. Of course, Members
of Congress immediately began maneuvering to make sure that their pet
projects did not get the axe. I think the President is on the right
track by trying to pare back congressional spending and I will
certainly be doing what I can to help him in that effort. However, the
truth is that, compared to federal mandatory spending on entitlement
programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social
[[Page H758]]
Security, Congress and President Bush are quibbling over pocket change.
If President Bush is serious about controlling federal spending, and
I believe that he is, he ought to reconsider his threat to veto any
attempt to pare back the prescription drug entitlement.
President Bush's initial prescription drug benefit was much more
fiscally responsible than the proposal he signed into law. I hope that
if there is an effort in Congress to make the prescription drug benefit
look more like President Bush's original plan, he will embrace it
rather than fight it.
____________________