[Congressional Record Volume 151, Number 2 (Thursday, January 6, 2005)]
[House]
[Page H83]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
RIGHTFUL ELECTION
(Mr. FOLEY asked and was given permission to address the House for 1
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
Mr. FOLEY. Mr. Speaker, we are delighted to be here today to swear
the electoral votes from all the States in the Union. Having witnessed
in 2000, very upfront and personal, there were a lot of charges made at
that time that votes were stolen, elections were rigged. Time and time
again evidence proved that those charges were false and malicious; and
the President of the United States, who was elected and sworn into that
office, was in fact the rightful recipient of that title.
Now, I understand today that there may be more mischief relative to
another State in the Union who is having the laser beam of focus on it
and that is Ohio.
Now, Florida was declared victorious for President Bush in 2000. In
2004, for a larger plurality of Floridians, the Democratic party worked
tirelessly to provide workers in Florida, having witnessed new faces
from around almost every county, participating in the democratic way of
trying to help their candidate. No excuses can be made. The President
of the United States, George W. Bush, won reelection; and we are here
today to do our constitutional duty to convey those electoral votes as
properly counted and tabulated and declared for the candidate who
received the majority.
{time} 1115
Ohio declared the victory for George W. Bush. Florida did as well, as
did many other States; and our Commander in Chief and President of the
United States is duly entitled to receive the swearing-in ceremonies on
these grounds on January 20.
Now, having Floridians subjected to a lot of catcalls and acrimony
over their voting habits, we are delighted another State has taken that
honor; but without question, having analyzed the documents, having
witnessed committee hearings on allegations and yet no one brought
meaningful charges, we are pleased and delighted that President Bush
again will serve this Nation for the next 4 years.
This weekend I would like to remind our Members that we celebrate the
10th anniversary of the 104th Congress. We are proud of the class that
was elected. My colleague, the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Hayworth),
has made arrangements for us all to go to Arizona to think back on what
we have achieved the last 10 years and what we hope to go forward with.
A lot of important issues like Social Security, Medicare, prescription
drug coverage, things of that nature, will be discussed at this
conference.
The gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Hayworth) and the gentleman from
Illinois (Mr. Weller) have been leaders in the effort, and I see my
colleague approaching the mike.
Mr. HAYWORTH. Mr. Speaker, will the gentleman yield?
Mr. FOLEY. I yield to the gentleman from Arizona.
Mr. HAYWORTH. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding.
Mr. Speaker, I thank my friend from Florida, especially in terms of
the fact that a quick check of the weather map indicates that his
district may enjoy temperatures in the 80s this weekend; and in
Arizona, we are just creeping back up to 65 in the Sonoran Desert. So I
appreciate the fact that he is willing to pack a sweater. Hopefully, no
umbrella will be needed in the wake of the moisture. We very much
needed it in the desert earlier this week and in the high country in
terms of snow.
But weather aside, we hope that all our friends from the class of
1994 and the 104th Congress will enjoy their time as we take a look at
where we have been and where we are headed in this 109th Congress.
Mr. FOLEY. Mr. Speaker, I was not going to brag about the weather in
Florida, but I have repeatedly on either Fox News Channel or in other
circumstances.
If I could also make one other mention on Social Security while I
have the floor reserved. Social Security is a very, very important
issue for Americans. There have been a lot of comments in the newspaper
about potential damage, destruction of Social Security; and I can
assure my colleagues, as one Member who comes from the fifth largest
Medicare-eligible population in America of all 435 districts, that this
truly is an important endeavor for our Congress, and we should not be
using brick bats to demonize one side or the other about plans.
We should talk constructively about the opportunities to engage, both
sides of the aisle, whether it is the gentleman from New York (Mr.
Rangel) or the gentleman from California (Mr. Thomas), who have
significant ideas about how to improve the structural nature of this
important program.
No one's trying to destroy it. Nobody's trying to uncouple it, but we
are trying to look at rational ways in which we can deliver the
benefits not only to those who are currently enrolled in the system,
but those who are starting their first job or just born.
It is much too important to have polarization on a topic that is so
critically important to our citizens. Our seniors need not be
frightened. Forty-five-year-olds need not be wondering whether it is
going to be there for them. A 30-year-old should not consider Social
Security like UFOs, unattainable, unavoidable or unlikely.
The system is going to be preserved. How we do that depends on the
willingness of both sides of the aisle to talk constructively about how
to create a financial network, strengthen the system in order that
recipients in the future may, in fact, receive their full benefits.
____________________