[Congressional Record Volume 150, Number 121 (Thursday, September 30, 2004)]
[House]
[Page H7941]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
TRUTH ABOUT IRAQ
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Washington (Mr. Inslee) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. INSLEE. Madam Speaker, I heard a very disturbing report today.
While we are engaging in a very important and legitimate debate about
our strategy in Iraq, one thing for sure we ought to be united on, and
that is Americans ought to have access to the truth and not to be the
subject of spin by their own government and should not have their own
government suppressing the truth about Iraq. Things are difficult
enough about Iraq without the Federal Government suppressing the truth
about Iraq.
Unfortunately, that appears to be what is going on in this
administration. Today in the Washington Post an article related that
the USAID ordered the restriction of preventing distribution of reports
by the contractor Kroll Security International which had previously
shown that the number of daily attacks by insurgents in Iraq had
increased significantly. In response to the news that these insurgent
attacks are increasing, about 5 weeks before this election, this
administration decided apparently to suppress that information and the
agency ordered that this information no longer be disseminated to the
American public.
This is information generated with U.S. American taxpayer dollars
that this administration, 5 weeks before the election, does not want
the American people to hear about.
{time} 1830
The article in The Washington Post says: ``The Kroll reports suggest
a broad and intensifying campaign of insurgent violence.'' In response
to that bad news, the agency official at USAID sent an e-mail to
congressional aides stating, ``This is the last Kroll report to come
in. After The Washington Post story, they shut it down in order to
regroup. I'll let you know when it restarts.''
There is no excuse for this administration shielding information
about Iraq and the fact that we have great difficulties there from the
American people. We have a legitimate right to know this information.
We have an important debate in our national body politic to figure out
the right strategy in Iraq, and it is wrong to suppress this
information.
We cannot decide the right decision in Iraq by looking through rose-
colored glasses anymore. Hope is not a strategy. Simply saying we are
going to have the same old, same old in Iraq and shield and hide the
ball from the American people just will not cut it. Tonight it would be
nice if the administration and the President admitted that we have some
difficulties in Iraq and admitted we need to make some changes in
strategy or we are going to have deep trouble.
But this is not the only symptom of an administration that is
refusing to face reality in Iraq. In that same story in The Washington
Post, I read that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's office is now
sponsoring a sort of happy talk, good news tour through our bases and
that we are using taxpayers' money to bring Iraqis to spread the good
news of Iraq to our military bases here in this country. The memo
disclosing this tour paid for by taxpayer dollars says it is ``designed
to be uplifting accounts with good news messages.'' Rumsfeld's office,
which will pay for the tour, recommends that the installations seek
local news coverage, noting that ``these events and presentations are
positive public relations opportunities.'' We do not need a public
relations campaign. We need a campaign for success in bringing our
troops home in Iraq. We are not getting that from this administration.
The memo went on to suggest that the commanders at each base ``are in
the best position on how to market this voluntary attendance program
effectively.'' We do not need a marketing campaign. We need an honest
discussion of how to get a strategy to bring our troops home after
success. But that is not what we are getting from this administration.
Instead of recognizing and coming clean with the American people about
their failures to find weapons of mass destruction, their failures to
tell the accurate situation about connections with al Qaeda, their
failures to have enough troops on the ground, their failures to have
enough body armor, they have given us a marketing technique protocol
paid for with taxpayer dollars. It is wrong. We need a strategy, not a
marketing campaign.
____________________