[Congressional Record Volume 150, Number 110 (Wednesday, September 15, 2004)]
[Senate]
[Pages S9265-S9266]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
ANTI-SEMITISM
Mr. BOND. Mr. President, today my subject is going to be one which we
had hoped would not be facing us. But it still faces us today, and that
is the age-old plague of anti-Semitism. Like so many other diseases, we
thought it had been wiped off the face of the Earth. But it has
returned in new and, unfortunately, virulent forms.
In July of this year, Australia's largest synagogue in the west coast
city of Perth was defaced with anti-Semitic graffiti that read ``6
million more please with fries.'' Recently, in the United States, and
at least 14 other countries, anti-Semitic incidents have been recorded,
and the trend is not promising. Mass expulsions, forced conversions,
bans on land ownership, job and housing discrimination all mark a
people who have been singled out, not because of what they have done
but because of who they are--Jews.
Now, many of us who came of age in the post-World-War-II era harbored
the illusion that the last remnants of anti-Semitism perished in
Hitler's gas chambers. Many believed that what American GI's discovered
in Nazi concentration camps was so horrendous and shocking that it
finally put an end to what historian Robert Wistrich had dubbed ``the
longest hatred''--that of anti-Semitism.
Unfortunately, we are witnessing a rapid re-emergence of anti-
Semitism. From the Middle East where sermons from mosques single out
Jews for death; to Paris, where Jewish schools are firebombed and
Jewish children are routinely attacked, to the conference against
racism in Durban, South Africa, which quickly became a carnival
attacking Israel; to the inordinate number of anti-Israeli resolutions
in the U.N. General Assembly, to U.S. college campuses, where anti-
Israel rallies become forums with chants that disintegrate into cries
of ``Death to the Jews'', anti-Semitic acts have become commonplace and
even fashionable once again. As Natan Sharansky wrote in Commentary
magazine, November 2003, ``Israel has become the world's Jew and anti-
Zionism is simply a substitute for anti-Semitism.''
In Washington, the recent attacks on Doug Feith and the so-called
neo-conservatives such as Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle charging
Jewish DoD officials with manipulating U.S. intelligence in order to
``force'' the United States to take out Saddam in Iraq contain familiar
anti-Semitic overtones. The fact is the Senate Intelligence Committee,
after an exhaustive review of pre-war U.S. intelligence, found
absolutely no evidence of pressure being put on intelligence analysts
to change their official assessments by any officer of the
administration.
The Jewish state has tried in earnest to sacrifice ``land for
peace''. We witnessed Prime Minister Barak's offer to Chairman Arafat:
shared sovereignty over Jerusalem, Muslim control of the Temple Mount,
97 percent of the West Bank and Gaza, and a land swap in the Negev for
a corridor around Jerusalem that couldn't be given away, a ``right of
return'' for thousands of Palestinian refugees, and a compensatory
package for those that couldn't be re-absorbed. The offer was so
generous that many were privately apprehensive about what would become
of Israel if Arafat were to have accepted it. Yet, Arafat walked away
from the negotiating table and responded with violence which has
remained unmitigated ever since. Over 1,000 innocent Israelis have lost
their lives for simply riding on buses, or going out to eat pizza with
their families.
Under Article 51 of the U.N. charter, a nation's primary
responsibility is to protect the lives of its citizens. When Israel
tried to do that, by building a defensive barrier to keep out
terrorists, which has resulted in a 90 percent decrease in terrorist
attacks, the U.N. General Assembly voted to refer it to the
International Court of Justice, in the Hague. The ICJ declared Israel's
security fence ``immoral'' and demanded that it be removed. The
security fence will disrupt the Palestinian's travel, but inconvenience
is not final, death is.
The ICJ decided that only Israel should be singled out for moral
opprobrium--for building a security fence to defend the lives of its
civilian population. This is occurring while Muslims with less dark
pigment in their skin are systematically murdering Muslims with more
dark pigment in their skin, in the Darfur region of the Sudan, to the
tune of 1,000 a week. When a Jew or Israel is judged by a different,
more stringent standard than that used to judge any other person or
nation, there is just one term for it: anti-Semitism.
Unfortunately, the scourge of anti-Semitism is prolonged when the
institutions we depend upon for community and regional stability are
infected by it. Take for example the United Nations Relief and Works
Agency, UNRWA.
The United Nations Relief and Works Agency was established in 1949 to
provide humanitarian services to Arabs who left their homes during the
war against Israel's independence. UNRWA is the only U.N. agency
assigned to serve only one class of people, and the
[[Page S9266]]
only refugee agency whose mandate does not include the resettlement of
its wards. Fifty-four years after its founding, UNRWA is providing
assistance to the grandchildren and great-grandchildren of those who
left. Soon it will be providing services to the grandchildren of the
grandchildren. All other refugees are the responsibility of the U.N.
High Commissioner for Refugees; who serves 21.8 million persons in 120
countries with the aim of resettling them.
This situation, unintended at first, is perpetuated now by a
combination of naivete, inertia and ill design. It is responsible in
large measure for the intractable nature of Palestinian and Arab claims
against the State of Israel, and makes the Palestinians tools in the
continuing Arab struggle to delegitimize and ultimately eliminate
Israel. The difficulties created for the Palestinian people by this are
legion.
With the exception of Jordan, Arab states in which they live have
refused to grant citizenship to them or to their descendants born after
1948.
In some countries, Lebanon in particular, laws strictly limit the
professions these persons may enter, the schools they may attend, or
the places they may live.
UNRWA schools, according to the State Department, provide children
with textbooks that ``contain anti-Israeli and anti-Jewish content.''
This is a mild statement. In fact, many of the texts contain
exceptionally lurid and hateful propaganda.
UNRWA-administered camps are filled with weapons, as has been
acknowledged by UNRWA personnel in statements to the media. The
Government of Israel has charged that UNRWA warehouses have been and
are being used to store weapons and bomb making material.
Each year UNRWA-financed projects, such as the Union of Youth
Activities Centers, sponsor gigantic ``right of return'' rallies
throughout the West Bank and Gaza, encouraging people to believe the
existence of Israel is temporary and will be reversed by the U.N.
UNRWA is financed by voluntary contributions and, according to U.N.
records, the United States has consistently contributed about 25
percent of UNRWA costs. In 2002, that amounted to $110 million. UNRWA
is funded annually, providing an opportunity for countries to examine
the mandate, propose changes, and decide whether or not it will renew
funding. It is time to initiate a thorough investigation into the
finances of this agency. We must work to eliminate institutional hatred
as exemplified by the anti-Semitic culture resident within UNRWA.
Some will say that America would not be targeted by terrorism if it
did not support Israel to the degree that it does. If we stand by and
witness this hatred without intervening or supporting our democratic
ally then we would become as venal as the rest of the world.
Appeasement of hatred and murder would only come back to haunt us just
as appeasement to terrorism in the 1980s and 1990s did on 9/11. Giving
in to the prevailing, fashionable wind of anti-Semitism and anti-
Zionism would directly contradict the ideals that this country has been
founded upon.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from New York.
____________________