[Congressional Record Volume 150, Number 108 (Monday, September 13, 2004)]
[House]
[Pages H7037-H7038]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
CONGRESS COMMITS SHAMEFUL ACT OF OMISSION
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentlewoman from California (Ms. Woolsey) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Ms. WOOLSEY. Mr. Speaker, today, this Congress committed a shameful
act of omission. When today's congressional session ended, so too ended
the assault weapons ban that has helped to keep our streets safe for
the past decade.
In 1994, President Clinton bravely ushered the assault weapons ban
through Congress. This act took its political toll on not only
President Clinton but also the Democratic Party, but he stuck to his
guns, so to speak, and strongly supported passage of this important
legislation.
As a result, the use of military-style automatic weapons in crimes
dropped from 4 percent in 1995, before the ban had taken effect, to 1
percent in the year 2002. In fact, according to the Department of
Justice, the proportion of banned assault weapons traced to crimes has
dropped by 66 percent since 1995.
The refusal by the House Republican leadership to bring up an
extension of the assault weapons ban and the failure of President Bush
to push for its renewal is about much more than gun control. This issue
is about nothing less than the very security of our Nation.
Today's failure to extend this important law will make Americans less
safe. In fact, al Qaeda, in their training manuals that were recovered
from Afghanistan, specifically cited the ease of obtaining automatic
rifles and machine guns in the United States. To many terrorists around
the world, America is known as the great gun bazaar.
Let us break down the facts: First, al Qaeda, our worst enemy, has
specifically instructed terrorists on how to
[[Page H7038]]
exploit America's gun laws to obtain the weapons they intend to use to
kill Americans.
Next, the United States had a proven and effective law on the books
that made it difficult to purchase these deadly weapons, and this law
needed to be renewed.
Finally, President Bush, who claims to be a huge homeland security
supporter, stayed silent. Why did he remain silent? Why did the
President not act? I believe the answer is really pretty simple.
{time} 1945
The National Rifle Association, the NRA, refused to support President
Bush's reelection bid until after the renewal date for the assault
weapons ban came and went, that was today, came and went untouched by
the White House. This President has been cowed by the NRA. The sad
irony is that last week Vice President Dick Cheney made the outrageous
claim that it is absolutely essential on November 2 that Americans make
the right choice because if we make the wrong choice, then the danger
is that we will get hit again. I quote that from the Vice President's
remarks.
This misleading connection in addition to insulting the intelligence
of the American people wrongly asserts that a vote for John Kerry and
John Edwards is a vote for terrorism. Instead, al Qaeda will be poised
to hit us again because in large part on September 13, 2004, today, the
Republican leadership has allowed Islamic militants and others to once
again purchase American machine guns, all for the reelection of the
President. How very, very shameful that is. If we truly want to secure
our homeland, we need to pursue policies that are smarter than those
that would decriminalize deadly weapons to elect someone to office. By
the way, virtually every major law enforcement organization in the
United States of America supports extending the ban.
That is why I have introduced a new SMART security platform for the
21st century. H. Con. Res. 392 is legislation to create a sensible,
multilateral, American response to terrorism. SMART security is
stronger on national security than President Bush claims to be. SMART
security will stop the sale of weapons to oppressive regimes and
regimes involved in human rights abuses. SMART security will pursue
enhanced inspection regimes and regional security arrangements to
ensure that state sponsors of terrorism do not get ahold of more light
weaponry, or even deadlier chemical or biological weapons.
Let us talk for a moment about presidential flip-flops. When it comes
to keeping assault weapons out of the hands of terrorists, George Bush
speaks out of both sides of his mouth.
____________________