[Congressional Record Volume 150, Number 103 (Thursday, July 22, 2004)]
[Senate]
[Pages S8579-S8581]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
9/11 COMMISSION REPORT
Mr. ALLARD. Mr. President, the report from the National Commission on
Terrorist Attacks upon the United States will be coming out today.
There has been some dribbling out of information about what that report
might contain, but we are not going to know
[[Page S8580]]
for sure the full content of that report until we get a briefing. I am
excited that a good portion of the report is going to be released to
the public. I am always of the belief that we need to have an open
dialog about issues and where there are shortcomings so that we can
come up with the answers and solutions that will serve us best.
I do not think any one group of people or even one individual has all
the answers. So I think the more dialog we can get as a result of this
report, the better. But I do think it serves us well to think about
where we are today, and how it is we got to where we are.
The President came into office about 3\1/2\ years ago. He was elected
in 2000. He had not even been in office a full year when all of a
sudden we had 9/11. What has emerged is that we have a serious problem
with terrorism.
Historically, if we look back through the 1990s, we see that there
was an emerging problem, which many of us did not recognize as serious
as it turned out to be, and most of us did not realize that a series of
events would eventually culminate into 9/11 and eventually a finishing
off of the war with Iraq. There was a pattern, in looking back.
By the way, it is always easy to look back and say we should have
done this and we should have done that, but it is much more difficult
to be prospective and say this is the information that is before us and
this is what is going to happen in the future.
What was happening in the 1990s was a persistent pattern of boldness
in the size and the number of terrorist attacks that were occurring
throughout the world. They started with car bombs, and we still have
car bombs today. Then they added attacks on embassies. We had an attack
on the Khobar Towers. We had an attack on the USS Cole. We had planes
bombed by terrorists. We had a partially successful attack from
terrorists in New York, and then all of a sudden it built up to the
ultimate, which was the 9/11 attack in this country which brought down
the Twin Towers in New York, and there was also an attack on the
Pentagon, which is the first time this country had been attacked on its
own soil since Pearl Harbor.
This was very much an awakening for the Congress, as well as the
American people. This President should be commended for rising to the
challenges of 9/11, and I think we have the right President in office
at the right time. He sent a strong message to the world that was
important to send, and that message was that we are not going to
tolerate terrorism, and if there are any other countries that are going
to support terrorist attacks, either directly or indirectly, they are
going to be considered part of the problem as we resolve these issues
related to terrorism.
As a result, he had to take some very strong stances. We had to take
some very strong positions.
Eventually, what evolved is that Afghanistan was the center. The
President dealt first with Afghanistan. Afghanistan was pretty much the
center of a lot of the terrorist activities. The Government had been
taken over by the terrorists. Afghanistan as a country was being used
as a training ground for terrorists who were exporting terrorism
throughout the world.
Today, Afghanistan is now a democracy, moving toward more freedom for
its people, and getting terrorism under control. It has some challenges
with economic growth, but I think President Karzai has done a
tremendous job. This all happened because of strong action by this
President in moving forward.
We saw that many of these terrorist groups, al-Qaida, for example,
had their origins in Saudi Arabia. We saw many terrorist groups that
were raising money through Saudi Arabia. Today, Saudi Arabia has
recognized the problem and taken some very strong actions. They are
working with the United States to control terrorism within their own
country.
We have Libya and Muammar Qadhafi, who was exporting terrorism and
actually attempting to develop a nuclear weapons program in his own
country. Now he has backed off and said, look, we want to work with the
United States. He has come out and publicly opposed terrorism. He has
given up his nuclear program. The nuclear inspectors can now go into
his country and look for nuclear materials.
We have made remarkable progress in Afghanistan. I know we have
remarkable progress in Saudi Arabia. We have made remarkable progress
in Libya. Even in North Korea we seem to sense more willingness on
their part at least to sit down with the United States and negotiate
with the United States on how it is we can move toward a more peaceful
environment.
Finally, that brings us to Iraq. I think that is another remarkable
achievement for this administration. Even though there are some
differences of opinion about how this should have been handled, the
fact is a large majority of the Senate, working with the President and
working with the United Nations, realized terrorism was a problem and
Iraq was a part of this problem.
The President decided to invade Iraq and Saddam Hussein. It was a
good decision. I need to remind Members this war started actually
before then. It started under his father, the first President George
Bush. The first President George Bush had to deal with an invasion by
Saddam Hussein into the country of Kuwait. He soundly defeated Saddam
Hussein. Saddam Hussein agreed to sign a treaty and in that treaty he
agreed to allow inspectors into his country. He agreed to many
provisions that were being stipulated by the United Nations. He agreed
to certain no-fly zones.
We attempted to enforce those no-fly zones as he was constantly
shooting at our planes. After the first conflict, Saddam Hussein
ignored what he had agreed to with the first President George Bush.
Then we had the United Nations inspectors going in and looking for
nuclear materials, weapons of mass destruction, and they were kicked
out of that country.
The Congress and the United Nations all agreed this was an unstable
situation and something needed to be done with Saddam Hussein. So
George Bush, who is now our President, made the right decision in
saying we need to go into Iraq and we need to deal with this unstable
situation because it is a persistent threat to world peace. If we do
not deal with the problem now, it is only going to get worse with time.
I have to say this President has done a great job. He has the support
of the American people.
Now this national commission on terrorist attacks upon the United
States is going to reveal some shortcomings and we are going to need to
address those. Our Nation has a leader who has made it clear that
winning the war on terror is the defining moment for the civilized
world.
Since September 11, 2001, President Bush has taken some bold steps to
ensure the safety and security of the United States, specifically
against terrorist organizations and the nation states that support
them. Specifically, since President Bush has taken office, the United
States, under his leadership, has overthrown two terrorist regimes,
rescued two nations and liberated over 50 million people, captured or
killed close to two-thirds of known senior al-Qaida operatives,
captured or killed 45 of the 55 most wanted in Iraq, including Iraq's
deposed dictator, Saddam Hussein, who is now sitting in jail, hunted
down thousands of terrorist and regime remnants in Iraq, disrupted
terrorist cells on most continents and likely prevented a number of
planned attacks. This is an astounding record of accomplishment for our
commander in chief and his national security staff.
We also have to recognize the phenomenal job of our men and women in
our military services. They have been phenomenal and I do not think we
can repeat that enough. We are very fortunate to have their dedication
and commitment, not only of the men and women who are serving in these
services, but their families and their communities back home who
support them.
The United States went to war in Afghanistan and Iraq risking
significant loss of life and treasure to protect our way of life. Our
goals are clear and twofold: Destroy the nexus of terrorism and weapons
of mass murder that personify the two ousted regimes and create in
their stead stable democratic states able to participate in the modern
world community.
We succeeded in our first goal, having killed or captured
perpetrators and supporters of the enemy terrorists. The courageous
people of Afghanistan and Iraq are making remarkable progress toward
adoption of constitutional reforms to secure momentum toward
[[Page S8581]]
lasting democratic independence. Nevertheless, we still have work to
do.
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report on Iraq's weapons
of mass destruction clearly identified what we have all known for some
time, our intelligence has not performed in as desirable a way as we
would like and in some cases has raised some issues about some of the
decisions we had to make in this Congress.
As a former member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, I say to my
colleagues that few employees in the Federal Government are as
dedicated as those who work for our intelligence agencies. They are
hard-working individuals who believe their work is critical to our
Nation's national security, and they provide us good information. As
policymakers, we also have to recognize the information they give us is
not always absolute. A lot of time it is a little bit of information
here, a little bit of information there, and we have to put it together
and say this is a likely event that is going to happen or this is
likely what is happening. It is not absolute in many regards, and we
have to treat it that way.
I think that is the way the President treated it, and I think that is
the way the Congress has looked at much of the information that we
received right after 9/11 and how terrorism is affecting us. That is
why it was so frustrating to learn our intelligence agencies did not
connect many of the dots in regard to September 11 and again failed to
provide reliable information on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction
programs.
We clearly have a considerable amount of work to do. As the Senate
Intelligence Committee recommended, we need to improve the process by
which analysts, collectors, and managers fuse intelligence and produce
judgments for policymakers, but that is not new. We have been facing
this problem for some time. I am glad we are taking it more seriously.
We need to greatly enhance almost every aspect of the intelligence
community's human intelligence efforts. We need to address the tendency
to build upon the judgments of previous assessments without including
the uncertainties in those assessments.
I will note the Senate Intelligence Committee's report did conclude
that the intelligence community's judgments regarding Saddam Hussein's
government's link to terrorist organizations were reasonable. Equally
important was the Senate Intelligence Committee's conclusion that the
exaggeration of the intelligence on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction
capabilities was not the result of political pressure.
As we prepare for the 9/11 Commission's report, I think it is
appropriate that we thank the people who served on the Commission for
their service to this country. Their service will go a long way to
helping our Nation prevent future attacks.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Talent). Who seeks recognition?
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, I rise to make remarks today on two
important subjects with which we are currently dealing in the Congress.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Kentucky.
____________________