[Congressional Record Volume 150, Number 96 (Tuesday, July 13, 2004)]
[House]
[Pages H5573-H5574]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




  LIMITATION ON AMENDMENTS DURING FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 4766, 
   AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, AND 
               RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2005

  Mr. LaHOOD. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that during further 
consideration of H.R. 4766 in the Committee of the Whole pursuant to 
House Resolution 710 the bill be considered as read and open for 
amendment at any point and no further amendment to the bill may be 
offered except:
  Pro forma amendments offered at any point in the reading by the 
chairman or ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations 
or their designees for the purpose of debate;
  Amendments 4, 5, 6, 8, and 12;
  Amendments 7, 10, and 13, each of which shall be debatable for 20 
minutes;
  An amendment by the gentlewoman from Ohio (Ms. Kaptur) regarding 
Farmers Market Promotion Program, which shall be debatable for 20 
minutes;
  An amendment by the gentlewoman from Ohio (Ms. Kaptur) regarding

[[Page H5574]]

outsourcing, which shall be debatable for 20 minutes;
  An amendment offered by the gentleman from California (Mr. Baca) 
regarding Office of Assistant Secretary For Civil Rights;
  An amendment by the gentleman from Washington (Mr. Baird) regarding 
livestock compensation;
  An amendment by the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Brown) regarding 
fluoroquinolone;
  An amendment by the gentleman from New York (Mr. Hinchey) regarding 
FDA, which shall be debatable for 20 minutes;
  An amendment by the gentlewoman from New York (Mrs. Maloney) 
regarding contraceptives, which shall be debatable for 40 minutes;
  An amendment by the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Obey) regarding 
information technology systems;
  An amendment by the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Obey) regarding 
circular A-76;
  An amendment by the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Flake) regarding 
tobacco, which shall be debatable for 40 minutes;
  An amendment by the gentleman from Vermont (Mr. Sanders) regarding 
agriculture tourism, which shall be debatable for 14 minutes; and
  An amendment by the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Tancredo) regarding 
food stamps, which shall be debatable for 20 minutes.
  Each such amendment may be offered only by the Member designated in 
this request, or a designee, or the Member who caused it to be printed 
in the Record, or a designee, shall be considered as read, shall not be 
subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for a 
division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole.
  Except as otherwise specified, each amendment shall be debatable for 
10 minutes, equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 
opponent. An amendment shall be considered to fit the description 
stated in this request if it addresses in whole or in part the object 
described.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Illinois?
  Mr. GOODLATTE. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the right to object.


                         Parliamentary Inquiry

  Mr. GOODLATTE. Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Speaker.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman will state it.
  Mr. GOODLATTE. Am I correct that this unanimous consent request would 
not impair the right of any Member to raise a point of order against 
authorizing language in the bill?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. As the Chair understands the proposed order; 
points of order against amendments are not waived, and points of order 
against provisions of the bill left unprotected by House Resolution 710 
still could be made.
  Mr. GOODLATTE. With that understanding, Mr. Speaker, I withdraw my 
reservation of objection.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Illinois?
  There was no objection.

                          ____________________