[Congressional Record Volume 150, Number 82 (Tuesday, June 15, 2004)]
[Senate]
[Page S6775]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005--Continued
Amendment No. 3183
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the question is on
agreeing to the Smith amendment No. 3183 to S. 2400.
The yeas and nays have been ordered. The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk called the roll.
Mr. REID. I announce that the Senator from Vermont (Mr. Jeffords) and
the Senator from Massachusetts (Mr. Kerry) are necessarily absent.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Are there any other Senators in the Chamber
desiring to vote?
The result was announced--yeas 65, nays 33, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 114 Leg.]
YEAS--65
Akaka
Alexander
Allen
Baucus
Bayh
Bennett
Biden
Bingaman
Boxer
Breaux
Byrd
Campbell
Cantwell
Carper
Chafee
Clinton
Coleman
Collins
Conrad
Corzine
Daschle
Dayton
DeWine
Dodd
Dorgan
Durbin
Edwards
Ensign
Feingold
Feinstein
Graham (FL)
Gregg
Harkin
Hollings
Inouye
Johnson
Kennedy
Kohl
Landrieu
Lautenberg
Leahy
Levin
Lieberman
Lincoln
Lugar
Mikulski
Miller
Murkowski
Murray
Nelson (FL)
Nelson (NE)
Pryor
Reed (RI)
Reid (NV)
Rockefeller
Sarbanes
Schumer
Smith
Snowe
Specter
Stabenow
Stevens
Voinovich
Warner
Wyden
NAYS--33
Allard
Bond
Brownback
Bunning
Burns
Chambliss
Cochran
Cornyn
Craig
Crapo
Dole
Domenici
Enzi
Fitzgerald
Frist
Graham (SC)
Grassley
Hagel
Hatch
Hutchison
Inhofe
Kyl
Lott
McCain
McConnell
Nickles
Roberts
Santorum
Sessions
Shelby
Sununu
Talent
Thomas
NOT VOTING--2
Jeffords
Kerry
The amendment (No. 3183) was agreed to.
Mr. KENNEDY. I move to reconsider the vote.
Mr. SMITH. I move to lay that motion on the table.
The motion to lay on the table was agreed to.
Mr. DASCHLE. Mr. President, hatred and violence are not traditional
values and they are not American values. Vicious crimes tear at the
very fabric of our society and should be prosecuted to the fullest
extent of the law.
Sixty-five Senators--including 18 Republican Senators--voted today to
expand hate crimes protection to all Americans. The overwhelming
support for the hate crimes amendment is a victory for basic fairness
and for victims' rights.
This bipartisan amendment provides more help for local law
enforcement--and tougher penalties for people who commit hate crimes.
It also expands hate crimes protections to include gender, sexual
orientation and disability. These are all reasonable changes that are
supported by the overwhelming majority of Americans and by law
enforcement agencies across the country.
Those who say these protections are unnecessary because they protect
only a small number of people miss the point. Even one beating, one
murder, or one assault is unacceptable. Hate crimes diminish all
Americans.
This is not the first time the Senate has voted to strengthen
existing federal protections against hate crimes. I brought these same
protections to the Senate floor when I was majority leader in 2002.
They were first introduced in 1997 and passed by the Senate in 1999. In
2000, majorities in both the House and Senate supported hate crimes
legislation--only to have the provisions stripped out behind the closed
doors of a conference committee at the insistence of the far right.
We urge the far right to end their efforts to prevent these modest
but important protections from being signed into law. We will continue
to press this case until all Americans enjoy equal protection from hate
crimes.
Mr. BYRD. Mr. President, today, I voted in support of an amendment to
the Department of Defense Authorization Act to establish that hate
crimes based on race, color, religion, and national origin are
prohibited at all times--not only when a person is involved in certain
federally protected activities as is the case under existing law. The
legislation I voted to enact today for the first time also prohibits
hate crimes based on three additional categories, meaning a person's
actual or perceived disability, gender, or sexual orientation, so long
as the incident has a demonstrable tie to interstate trade.
The legislation voted on today is different than the hate crimes
legislation I opposed in June 2000 in several significant ways.
Primarily, it includes stronger safeguards to ensure that the States
continue to take the lead in prosecuting hate crimes. The language of
the amendment makes it clear, though, that the Federal Government can
prosecute a hate crime at the Federal level in circumstances where, for
example, the State does not have jurisdiction or refuses to take
jurisdiction over the crime.
In June 2002, I voted in support of an amendment nearly identical to
the hate crimes legislation approved today. Then, and today, I
approached the Senate leadership about adding to the legislation
language that would include age as a protected category, so that crimes
directed against the elderly and children could also be considered hate
crimes under this law. Defining age as an additional protected category
in the law would also give State and local law enforcement officials
new tools to provide technical, forensic, prosecutorial, and other
assistance beneficial to prosecuting hate crimes against the elderly
and children.
Unfortunately, the managers of the hate crimes legislation declined
to accept my suggestion of defining age as being an additional
protected category under the bill, but I pledge to continue to do all
that I can to make certain that the elderly and children are provided
all protections possible to ensure their safety, and to make certain
that those who perpetrate hate crimes against them receive suitable
punishment.
____________________