[Congressional Record Volume 150, Number 82 (Tuesday, June 15, 2004)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6749-S6751]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
RECOGNITION OF THE DEMOCRATIC LEADER
The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Democratic leader is recognized.
Mr. DASCHLE. Mr. President, I will use my leader time to make a
relatively brief statement.
The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Democratic leader is recognized for
that purpose.
Mr. DASCHLE. Mr. President, over the past 4 years, our nation has
gained a renewed awareness of the bravery and sacrifice of America's
service men and women.
And through the exceptional valor they have routinely displayed,
America has also gained a renewed sense of gratitude for the service of
our veterans.
So it was with a heightened sense of respect and appreciation that
America commemorated the recent anniversary of D-Day and Memorial Day,
and dedicated the long-overdue memorial to the generation that fought
and won World War II.
The veterans who came to Washington expecting to find one tribute
cast in stone, encountered many living tributes, just as meaningful,
and just as enduring.
Americans of all ages, of all backgrounds, said ``thank you'' to the
veterans who fought for them. Some gave gifts of American flags. Others
asked for pictures.
I recently heard a story about two World War II veterans who were
eating dinner at a restaurant, when a young man they had never met
thanked them, and struck up a conversation.
He asked about their service, and told them that two of his relatives
didn't make it home from Europe.
When it came time for the two older men to pay the tab, they found
that the young man had already paid it. He left a card that said, ``To
two old guys who paid the price, but who are not going to pay today.''
The memory of our veterans' achievements will live on long after
them, and all Americans should feel proud that, in this way, we have
kept faith with our veterans.
But a shadow is cast over the tributes now paid to our veterans, and
indeed, to our soldiers fighting in uniform today.
There seems to be a gap between the thanks America offers its
veterans in word, and the thanks our government shows veterans in deed.
[[Page S6750]]
The waits at the VA hospital are too long.
Veterans are paying record amounts out-of-pocket for VA health
services.
In recent days, we have learned that the White House is planning new
cuts for FY06, even as the VA faces an influx of war veterans from
Iraq.
This year, as in every election year, Americans will ask themselves,
am I better off than I was four years ago? Am I safer? Am I more
financially secure? Do I have better access to prescription drugs and
health care than before?
In the coming months, America's 26 million veterans will be asking
themselves those same questions. All America would do well to listen to
their answers.
Recently, I heard from a South Dakotan named Howard Anderson.
Howard is 77 years old, a veteran of World War II. Howard is grateful
to the doctors and nurses at the VA, but feels squeezed by the rising
cost of prescription drugs.
On average, he pays around $90 per month for medicine to treat his
lung condition.
The VA won't pay for his medications because he makes too much money
even though he and his wife live on their Social Security. ``At the end
of the month,'' he said, ``I couldn't write you a check for a dollar.''
Not long ago, the VA sent Howard a letter notifying him that he owed
another $300 for prescriptions.
After the shock wore off, Howard went back through his receipts and
found he was being double-charged.
It had happened before, but he didn't have the patience to battle
through the bureaucracy to make it right again, so he just paid the
bill. This time, he just couldn't afford it.
The VA ultimately admitted it was making a mistake. But Howard is
beginning to get the sense that tight budgets have forced the VA to
become more aggressive about denying care or sending the bill to the
veteran.
``They say these benefits are there for you,'' he says, ``but when
you go to get them, they don't give them to you.''
Let me say that the problems with the VA health system are not the
fault of the doctors and nurses and the other men and women who work at
VA hospitals and clinics.
They are among the most talented, most dedicated health professionals
in this country. But they can only do so much with the resources they
are given.
And from the first days of this Administration, the White House has
systematically tried to reduce veterans benefits, cut funding to the
VA, and shortchange the health care of America's veterans.
Over the past four years, the budget for veterans' health has risen
far less than the rate of health care inflation, forcing VA hospitals
to meet rising demand with shrinking resources.
The White House's 2005 budget deepens this trend by including only a
1.9 percent funding increase, barely one-sixth of the rate at which
health care costs are increasing nationwide.
Overall, the White House budget falls over $4.1 billion short of
veterans' needs, according to the Independent Budget created by leading
nonpartisan veterans groups.
Not only would the White House's budget strain VA hospital budgets to
the breaking point, it would drive nearly 800,000 veterans out of the
VA health system.
Eight-hundred thousand Americans who were promised health care in
exchange for their service to their country will be denied and kicked
off the rolls for no reason other than the Administration's refusal to
adequately fund veterans' health.
This would be on top of a recent decision by President Bush to deny
our obligations to 200,000 Priority 8 veterans and keep them from
enrolling in the VA health care system.
Those veterans who remain in the system have been forced to pay more,
much more. Over the course of the last three years, the amount veterans
have paid toward their own care has increased a staggering 340 percent,
or $561 million.
And if the White House gets its way, veterans would need to pick up
over a half-billion dollars more of their care in 2005, if the budget
proposals as we have now witnessed them go through.
Some within this administration seem to believe that our
responsibility to our soldiers is when they come home, but we couldn't
disagree more.
If it were not for the efforts of many in Congress, the story would
be much worse. Since President Bush took office, we have led the charge
to add a total of almost $2 billion in funding for veterans health care
beyond what the President proposed.
Moreover, in each of the last 3 years, Democrats have blocked Bush
administration attempts to increase copayments and enrollment fees even
higher. Is this the same President who ran for election with a pledge
to veterans that ``help is on the way''?
In the next few days, some of us will offer an amendment to make a
simple promise to our veterans: If you wore the uniform of our Nation,
if you fought under our flag, your health care needs will be met for
life. The full funding of veterans health care would be made mandatory
under the law.
For too long, the VA budget has been subject to the give-and-take of
budget politics. It is time we set things straight.
Funding for the VA should no longer be set by political convenience,
back-room deals, or zero sum game of budget politics. One thing, and
one thing alone, should govern the care of our veterans: the needs of
care for those veterans.
Senate Democrats have also been fighting, and we will continue to
fight, for full concurrent receipt of all disabled veterans under the
remarkable leadership of my colleague, the distinguished assistant
Democratic leader from Nevada.
The Bush administration has repeatedly threatened to veto concurrent
receipt, and last year the White House called together leading veterans
organizations to propose a compromise: We will give you full concurrent
receipt but only if you agree to end disability benefits for two-thirds
of all veterans.
Veterans organizations and their allies in Congress rejected the
inadequate proposal. Instead, thanks in large part to Senator Reid,
Democrats were able to pass a provision to allow veterans rated 50-
percent disabled or more to receive full concurrent receipt.
We have made progress on concurrent receipt since the last election,
but it has been in spite of the administration, not because of it. What
we have achieved so far is just a downpayment on what disabled veterans
have been promised and what they deserve. How could we do otherwise?
How could we let our country move forward and leave behind the men and
women whose bravery has won our freedom and prosperity?
The debt we owe our veterans is unending. But just because we could
never hope to repay fully our obligations to our veterans does not
excuse us from trying. Today we are further away from doing right by
our veterans than ever before.
America's veterans are not better off than they were 4 years ago.
When he signed the GI Bill of Rights in 1944, President Roosevelt noted
that ``the members of our Armed Forces have been compelled to make
greater . . . sacrifices than the rest of us, and they are entitled to
definite action to take care of their special problems.''
The current White House has allowed ``definite action'' to give way
to little more than indefinite praise. Veterans deserve better. The
soldiers fighting this very day, at this very moment, deserve better.
I think back to that young man 2 weeks ago who looked upon two men to
whom he owed his freedom and way of life, and he knew enough to say
thank you.
Then I think of Howard Anderson who did pay the price but is being
denied help by the Government because it refuses to fully fund veterans
health. Howard Anderson and all veterans are owed a debt.
We should acknowledge that debt every day, not just in stone
monuments or in lofty speeches or bright parades. It should be repaid
in a real and concrete commitment to care for veterans in the days when
veterans need it the most.
These men and women risked their lives to defend our own. They stood
up for us, and now we must stand up for them, not just with words but
with action.
I yield the floor.
[[Page S6751]]
____________________