[Congressional Record Volume 150, Number 74 (Tuesday, June 1, 2004)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6267-S6268]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
U.S. INVESTMENT IN INTERNATIONAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Mr. JEFFORDS. Mr. President, I address the Senate on the matter of
the need for continued U.S. investment in energy efficiency projects in
other countries, as well as our own. I recently submitted my view on
this matter to a publication of the Alliance to Save Energy, but I feel
now, particularly in these times of high gasoline prices, that I should
make a few remarks to the full Senate on this issue.
Fluctuating energy prices and instability in the Middle East once
again are prompting calls for energy independence for the United
States. In our efforts to meet that goal, we cannot forget that the
energy use of other countries directly effects both the supply and
price of our energy resources here at home.
Federal efforts to ensure freedom from fluctuations in energy prices
have been advocated by every President, both Republican and Democrat,
since 1973 and the infamous oil boycott. As Americans we count on
energy to protect our security, to fuel our cars, to provide heat, air
conditioning and light for our homes, to manufacture goods, and to
transport supplies. In all of these needs, we, as consumers, pay the
price for fluctuations in the global energy market.
Our efforts to guarantee adequate energy supplies in the U.S. should
prompt us to again take a hard look at energy efficiency not only here,
but abroad. We are reminded that the international energy efficiency
programs and projects run by our Federal Government protect and enhance
the economies and standard of living of developing nations around the
world. Given that we have a single integrated global petroleum market
these efficiency programs directly benefit American consumers: by
lessening demand for oil abroad, we are helping to loosen supply and
hold down price pressures domestically. Quite simply, lowered oil
demand in Madras helps truckers in Montpelier. Lowered oil use in Sao
Paolo helps drivers in Santa Fe.
A visitor to the capital of almost any developing country, be it
Bangkok, Cairo, Manila, or Mexico City, will have a common experience.
These places have already seen extraordinary increases in energy use.
People who last saw these places 10 or 15 years ago are struck by the
massive increase in air pollution from automobiles, trucks, and
factories. As development takes hold and growth accelerates, energy use
increases dramatically. But in many cases developing countries do not
use energy efficiently. They often require two to four times more
energy than industrial countries to produce the same output. This fuel
consumption speeds up the accumulation of carbon dioxide in the
atmosphere, contributing to global warming. In addition, fuel
combustion is often dirty and incomplete, generating local pollution.
U.S. Government-funded efforts energy-efficient programs that provide
equipment and improved energy management practices can greatly reduce
energy consumption. Over the last 10 to 15 years, the U.S. Agency for
International Development, U.S. AID, launched a number of energy
conservation projects aimed at energy use. These projects helped create
an interest in energy efficiency, trained local engineers in energy
management, and sponsored energy audits and demonstration investments.
The projects were technically successful and had good economic rates of
return, and the Alliance to Save Energy has been involved in several of
these projects. In most cases, fuel savings paid for the cost of
investments in a year to two. By reducing energy consumption, the
measures also reduced pollution.
One of the most successful examples of a national energy conservation
program has been Brazil's National Electricity Conservation Program
PROCEL. With support from U.S. AID, PROCEL has developed demonstration
and education programs to foster energy efficiency savings and reduce
the need for new construction of costly power plants. The country has
developed energy efficiency standards, regulatory measures, and joint-
venture projects that have become a model for the rest of Latin
America. PROCEL's energy efficiency measures have resulted in direct
savings of over 1200 gigawatt-hours per year.
The need for programs such as these are overwhelming. According to
the Energy Information Administration's most recent International
Energy Outlook world energy consumption will rise by 54 percent from
2001 to 2025, driven by rising demand for power in China, India and
other parts of the developing world.
The report, issued on April 15, 2004, says oil will remain the
dominant energy source worldwide through 2025, in Asian markets as well
as in the United States. Combined, Asian and U.S. consumers will
account for nearly 60 percent of the increase in world oil demand,
which is projected to rise from 77 million barrels per day in 2001 to
121 million barrels per day in 2025. To meet that rising demand, the
world's producers would have to increase daily production by more than
44 million barrels.
And for electric power generation, coal dominates energy markets in
China, India, and other developing Asian countries. EIA projects
extensive increases in coal use in China and India. EIA also projects a
near doubling of worldwide net electricity consumption by 2025, from
13,290 billion kilowatt hours to 23,072 billion kilowatt hours--again
propelled by rising demand for electricity in the developing world.
Unfortunately, despite these successes there is an alarming and
decreasing trend in funding for energy efficiency programs at U.S. AID.
During the past few years these programs have received a cut in
funding--with the fiscal year 2004 request ($8 million) cut to 50
percent of the fiscal year 2001, $16 million funding. And the current
proposal will not reverse this trend.
In a century likely to contain many surprises and new challenges, the
importance of U.S. energy security can only increase. In achieving
energy security we must be mindful of a few things. We must assist
developing countries in cultivating a responsible energy policy which
supports sound economic and social development for the betterment of
their population and the global environment. This mutually beneficial
partnership will enhance our energy security while providing sorely
needed revenues for health care, education, and infrastructure abroad.
We
[[Page S6268]]
also must remember that it takes continued federal investment to
achieve this worthy goal.
____________________