[Congressional Record Volume 150, Number 69 (Monday, May 17, 2004)]
[House]
[Page H3020]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]


  UNDER REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP CONGRESS IS A QUICKSAND OF IDEOLOGY AND 
                             INTRANSIGENCE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the order of the House of 
January 20, 2004, the gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Hoyer) is recognized 
during morning hour debates for 5 minutes.
  Mr. HOYER. Mr. Speaker, in February, the former majority leader in 
this House, Dick Armey, stated the obvious: ``I am sitting here and I 
am upset about the deficit, and I am upset about spending,'' said the 
former Republican leader. And he added, ``There is no way I can pin 
that on the Democrats. Republicans own the town now.''
  Yes, they do, Mr. Speaker, the House, the Senate, and the White 
House. Yet, under Republican leadership this Congress has become a 
quicksand of ideology and intransigence that is swallowing up America's 
priorities and performing a disservice to the American people.
  The annual budget is a blueprint of our Nation's priorities and 
values. But with a Memorial Day recess approaching and the April 15 
budget deadline long passed, House Republicans have tied the process in 
knots.
  They refuse to pay for tax cuts even as they have run up the largest 
budget deficit and deficits as far as the eye can see in American 
history.
  Republicans' intraparty bickering continues to get in the way of 
other priorities. In addition to the budget, two job creation bills, a 
tax measure for domestic manufacturing called the FSC/ETI bill, and a 
major transportation bill have been stymied, held up, not moving since 
last year. The transportation bill could create millions of jobs in a 
tough job market, and the FSC bill would end harmful European Union 
sanctions against struggling American manufacturers. Both of these 
bills could have been passed, should have been passed last year with 
broad support in both Houses of Congress. But with House Republicans it 
is my way or the highway.
  Our friends on the other side of the aisle have even rejected 
progress on an issue that has broad bipartisan support, tax cuts for 
the middle-class and working families. They have done so not once, not 
twice, but three times in 3 weeks. And they are poised to do so for a 
fourth time this week.
  By refusing to offset the cost of their tax bills, Republicans are 
not only endangering support for tax cuts which Members on both sides 
want to see become law, but also putting themselves on record in favor 
of placing an enormous debt tax on future generation of American 
children.
  House Republican leaders may be content with inertia in the people's 
House. Democrats are not.
  Last week the Washington Post shined a light on the Republican 
strategy of biding their time until the election. The Post story 
observed that, and I quote, ``Despite the burgeoning scandal over U.S. 
treatment of Iraqi prisoners and persistent concerns about the economy 
and the deficit, the House has been keeping banking hours.'' Frankly, 
the bank would be bankrupt if it kept our hours.
  In contrast to Republican leaders of the other body, House Republican 
leaders have refused to fully investigate the abuse of Iraqi prisoners. 
This is just the latest example of an abdication of this body's 
constitutional responsibility to oversee the executive branch.
  Even a prominent Republican from the other body has said, and I 
quote, ``We Republicans have never quite reached the level of competent 
oversight that the Democrats developed over their 40 years that they 
controlled Congress.''
  He continued, major Republican leader, ``We tried to emphasize 
legislating and we have delegated so much authority to the executive 
branch of government and we ought to devote more time to oversight than 
we do.''
  This House must not abdicate its constitutional responsibility as an 
independent, coequal branch of government. Failure in this regard is 
not an option.
  Failure is not an option in Iraq. And Democrats will support the 
funding necessary to support our troops and finish the job. But we want 
to see where that money is spent, how it is spent, and how effectively 
it is being used. But there is absolutely no question that Democrats as 
well as Republicans should want to hold this administration accountable 
for how it is spending tens of billions of taxpayer dollars in so many 
different areas.
  As a senior member of the Committee on Appropriations, Mr. Speaker, I 
will continue my efforts to attach accountability to the billions of 
dollars being spent on the war in Iraq. There are no checks and no 
balances in Washington today. Right now we need to focus on the 
oversight responsibility that our Founding Fathers expected, 
particularly the people's House, to exercise.
  I hope, Mr. Speaker, that notwithstanding the performance of the 
first 5 months, we will soon see such responsibility exercised.

                          ____________________