[Congressional Record Volume 150, Number 62 (Thursday, May 6, 2004)]
[Senate]
[Page S4943]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
RESTORING JUVENILE JUSTICE FUNDING
Mr. KOHL. Madam President, I rise today to discuss juvenile crime and
juvenile crime prevention programs. We must remember that a strategy to
combat juvenile crime consists of a large dose of prevention programs
as well as strong enforcement. Juvenile justice programs have proven
time and time again that they help prevent crime, strengthen
communities, and give children a second chance to succeed and lead
healthy lives. It is no secret that robust funding for these programs
in the 1990s contributed to a 68 percent drop in juvenile crime from
1994 to 2000. Most importantly, investment in our at-risk children will
help prevent a life marred by crime and wasted in prison.
For these programs to succeed, however, they must be priorities for
this Congress and for this administration. We fear that we are failing
to live up to our responsibility on this essential issue. A little more
than 3 months ago, President Bush released his fiscal year 2005 budget
proposal. In it, juvenile justice and delinquency programs will receive
only about one-third of the funding they received 3 years ago. This is
at a time when recent statistics indicate an uptick in juvenile crime
and an increase in school murder rates.
We understand that other priorities compete with juvenile justice
funding and local crime prevention programs. Yet the amounts we are
discussing are so small in the grand scheme of the budget, and the
results from the programs so immense, that they mandate our attention.
When the Senate considered the budget resolution, we began to address
the shortfalls in juvenile justice funding. I was pleased to work with
Senators Hatch and Biden on an amendment to restore cuts made to
juvenile justice programs and local law enforcement funding. Our
amendment represents a step in the right direction by restoring
juvenile justice funding to last year's levels, and reversing the trend
of ever-diminishing appropriations for these programs. It is essential
that the Kohl-Hatch-Biden amendment that restores juvenile justice
funding remain in the final Budget Resolution.
These programs are a wise investment. For every dollar spent on
prevention, we save $3 to $4 in costs associated with juvenile crime.
Furthermore, law enforcement officials strongly support prevention
efforts. A recent poll shows that 71 percent of police chiefs, sheriffs
and prosecutors believe that crime prevention efforts would have the
greatest impact in reducing youth violence and crime. So for those who
may fear that a crime prevention strategy is not ``tough'' enough on
juveniles, we suggest that these programs make sound economic sense and
are overwhelmingly endorsed by law enforcement. We must do a better job
of funding them.
Let me tell you about two essential programs. In 1992, we established
the Title V Local Delinquency Prevention Program. Title V was and
remains unique in that it is the only source of federal funding solely
dedicated to juvenile crime prevention efforts. More importantly, Title
V has proven to be a very successful program that encourages
investment, collaboration, and long-range prevention planning by local
communities.
Title V programs include preschool and parent training programs,
youth mentoring, after-school activities, tutoring, truancy reduction,
substance abuse prevention and gang prevention outreach. Through these
initiatives, large cities like Milwaukee to small communities like
Ladysmith, WI are creating environments that strengthen families and
help children avoid crime and develop into productive adults.
Enforcement is an important part of the overall strategy, but the
administration cuts those programs as well. Positive intervention and
treatment at this early stage of delinquency can prevent further
violent behavior and steer a young person in the right direction before
it is too late. Realizing this, Congress created the Juvenile
Accountability Incentive Block Grant Program, JAIBG, in 1997 and
provided it with healthy funding levels of $250 million. Congress
reauthorized Title V and JAIBG in 2002 at even greater levels. And we
improved JAIBG by adding substance abuse and mental health counseling,
restitution, community service, and supervised probations to the list
of program options. The reauthorized program also ensures State and
local accountability for proper and effective uses of funds.
We have a choice in this Congress of where we want to invest our
money. We can choose to address the roots of crime and invest in our
children by preventing a life of criminal behavior. We can choose to
intervene in a positive manner to work with those teens that have
fallen through the cracks and have had a few scrapes with the law. We
can turn many of those kids around. I urge my colleagues to make the
right choice this year and boost funding for the Title V program, the
Juvenile Accountability Block Grant program, and juvenile justice
programs overall. We can and must do better.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Wisconsin is recognized.
____________________