[Congressional Record Volume 150, Number 62 (Thursday, May 6, 2004)]
[House]
[Pages H2708-H2709]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
MISMANAGEMENT OF WAR IN IRAQ
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Frank) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts. Mr. Speaker, I was appalled at the
comments that just preceded me.
John Kerry is a brave man today, and he was a brave man 35 years ago
when he answered his country's call and was wounded on its behalf. And
to hear one say that he came close to giving aid and comfort, of
course, that is part of a phrase that describes treason, is unworthy of
this House. And to couple that sort of wholly unjustified attack on
this brave man because he challenges the President and then to say,
well, let us avoid partisan rhetoric, there are no words to describe
that that would be acceptable under the rules of the House.
I do want to talk about what is going on in Iraq, and I do it with
great sadness. Six months ago if someone had told me that American
military personnel and civilians employed by the United States
Government had engaged in the kind of outrageous dehumanizing behavior
that we have recently seen public, I would have been indignant. I would
have said, look, I disagree with the Iraq policy. I did not vote to go
to war with Iraq, but I think it is unfair to accuse Americans of this.
And we now say that we have to acknowledge that Americans empowered
by the United States Government, not specifically to do that, but they
were there because of American government policy, committed these
outrageous acts. But it is not enough simply to blame a handful of
individuals as the majority tried to do earlier today with a
resolution.
I want to stress again how absolutely wrong it was for the Republican
majority in the House to bring forward today a resolution on this
extraordinarily important question. I am told the President just
apologized, as he should have. He should have done it earlier.
We have got a major set-back in American policy but more importantly,
a revelation that Americans did things in the name of the country that
should not have been contemplated, much less done. And we were only
given an hour to discuss it? And the majority used its automatic
submissive majority of its Members to prevent any amendment, to prevent
any proposal. Many of us believe it is not enough for the military to
investigate itself. They have known about this for some time.
First of all, this is the military's failing. Though the Secretary of
Defense did not do this in this prison, but the
[[Page H2709]]
Secretary of Defense and his aids set up this prison which led this to
happening, the inadequate supervision, the whole problem here, this is
one which we must thoroughly investigate. And having the perpetrators
not of the particular acts but of the efforts that led to these acts
investigates themselves is wholly unacceptable.
We were not even allowed because of this automatic submissive
majority to offer an amendment to call for that sort of an
investigation. I want to stress again, what could be more bizarre than
for us to tell the Iraqis that we will teach them how to be democratic,
with a small D.
We in particular are telling the Shiites who are in the majority in
Iraq, use your majority wisely and prudently. Yes, if you are in the
majority you have a right ultimately to make the decision, but please
show respect for minority rights. Please encourage openness.
I only hope, Mr. Speaker, that the Iraqis were not watching the
debate today because if the Shiites were to emulate the House
Republicans in terms of their approach to democracy, then we have very
little chance of achieving what we want.
I only hope that people in the leadership of the Shiite movement in
Iraq do not take the majority leader of this House as an exemplar of
democracy. But it is not simply the inadequate way in which the
military has responded to these outrages, and we might never have known
if these things were not leaked. The military knew for a long time.
They came up here and talked to committees. They misled people when
they asked questions about contractors. They left names off lists. The
way in which they have handled this was outrageous.
I wish it were an exception. I wish this terrible abuse and these
cover ups and this refusal to supervise adequately, I wish it were an
exception. But we also had, within the last week or two, the on-again
off-again appointment of the Iraqi general in Falujah in which, first
of all, we were going to have a war in Falujah. Fortunately, they
decided, let us try to minimize the killing. So they appoint an Iraqi
general to be in charge.
First we were told he is acceptable to everybody. Then it turned out
because of his previous connections to the regime he was unacceptable
and a new general comes in.
We have had error after error after error. We have a lack of
coordination between the State and Defense Departments. I do not think
there has been a major national security operation handled as
incompetently as the way this administration has muddled in Iraq in a
very long time.
Vietnam ultimately became a terrible set of mistakes, but I do not
think in a comparable period Vietnam was as badly handled.
This administration has failed this country in the miserably
incompetent way it has handled Iraq.
____________________