[Congressional Record Volume 150, Number 61 (Wednesday, May 5, 2004)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4855-S4856]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
GAS PRICES
Mr. CORZINE. Mr. President, first of all, let me go back and
compliment my colleague from Oregon, who I think has analyzed a problem
that fits into a pattern of economic pressure that we see building on
the middle class in America.
There is nothing more fundamental today in life than filling the car
with gasoline and using it for commuting and taking the kids to school
and doing all the normal tasks that we have going on. We see the same
problem, by the way, with health care costs, tuition costs, and with
property taxes across this country.
While there may be some good economic statistics out there, middle-
class Americans are being hit unbelievably hard on the fundamentals
that drive their basic budgets. Nothing--nothing--more clearly
demonstrates this than these rising gasoline prices we have been
experiencing this year. There has been a 23-cent increase in the price
of gasoline. Nationally, the average price for gasoline is $1.84 a
gallon. Many places in the country it is over $2 a gallon.
This comes from flawed simple economics 101, supply and demand. This
administration is doing everything that you can imagine to hold back
supply by filling the petroleum reserve at accelerated rates, when it
is already about 95 percent full. It does not need to be in this
position.
As we go into the summer season, the ``perfect storm'' the Senator
from Oregon talks about is also being implemented with regard to other
policies. It is counter to any basic economic analysis that you would
want, to be taking supply off the market that would run down prices. I
don't know what people are thinking when they implement policies that
are going to restrict supply, and when they are unwilling to confront
OPEC as they are cutting back supply. What we are getting is the
natural result of rising prices, which is coming right out of the
pocketbook of middle-class Americans. It is just absolutely wrong.
If you are cynical, you can also say, well, maybe it is because some
people benefit from these higher prices. Being someone who worked in
the private sector for 25 years of my life, I don't think profits are a
bad thing. But when the American people are suffering from this erosion
of their quality of life--because of the rise in property taxes, health
care costs, tuition costs, and now gas prices--you wonder why it is so
appropriate that Exxon-Mobil's profits were up 125 percent in the first
quarter of this year; BP's profits were up 165 percent; and Chevron-
Texaco's profits were up 294 percent. Is that economic fairness, in any
context, particularly when you put it into the perspective that what
the Bush administration is doing is restricting supply?
This is just wrong. It is out of the context of what is best for the
American economy and for growth and the quality of life of Americans.
It needs to be addressed. We are creating a windfall for American
business at the expense of middle-class Americans. And it is happening
day after day after day.
I do not begrudge profits, but I don't think it ought to be done on
the backs of the American middle class because of the general
macroeconomic policies of the President. And that is exactly what we
have right now. It is wrong and needs to be pushed back, just as we
need to confront Saudi Arabia with regard to its leadership in OPEC. If
they are our ally, as they claim to be, then we ought to be speaking to
them about increasing the production of oil out of OPEC as opposed to
the restrictions we have seen.
From what we understand from all news reports and actually the Saudi
Foreign Minister has said, there has not been one word of contact from
this administration to the Saudis about OPEC production.
So now we have two of those very large ingredients into the supply
and demand equation. That is why we are getting high prices. That is
why gas is $1.84 a gallon, on average, in the country. And that is why
it is $2 a gallon on the coast and most of the places where our larger
population segments work.
It is really troubling we cannot put together a response to something
that is eroding the quality of life in the aftertax base of middle-
class Americans to actually operate in a sound way. So I hope we will
all follow Senator Wyden's lead. He has done a terrific job of bringing
focus to it, as has the Senator from New York, talking about pushing
back against OPEC on production cutbacks. We really need to take a
stand for the American people, not for the oil companies and the
profitability we are seeing brought forth.
At a time when we still have not recovered those 2.6 million private
sector
[[Page S4856]]
job losses, when 8.5 million Americans are unemployed, why we are
putting more pressure on middle-class Americans and their quality of
life is just hard to believe. It is time for a change. Supporting the
proposition of the Senator from Oregon is one that I think we all ought
to get out and get to work on.
Mr. President, I yield the floor.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from Nevada.
____________________