[Congressional Record Volume 150, Number 60 (Tuesday, May 4, 2004)]
[House]
[Page H2524]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR OUR TROOPS
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Cole). Under a previous order of the
House, the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Strickland) is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mr. STRICKLAND. Mr. Speaker, I appreciate being recognized.
Mr. Speaker, as my friend, the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Brown), said
earlier, in a press conference recently on the 13th, the President was
asked if he could identify any mistakes he may have made, and he was
unable to do so.
I can tell him a mistake that he and his administration has made.
They sent our young soldiers into harm's way when the war in Iraq began
without adequate body armor. That is the truth. They cannot escape that
fact. There were soldiers who were placed in harm's way without having
the protection of this basic equipment.
The war began in March. I have written Secretary Rumsfeld over the
last year two letters asking him to explain to me and to the American
people why our soldiers were placed in harm's way without this
protection.
This body armor that I am talking about became available, I think,
for the first time in 1998. It is called the ``interceptive vest.'' It
is made of Kevlar with ceramic plates in both the front and the back.
It is so effective that it can stop an AK-47 bullet, and it has been
credited with saving the lives of many of our soldiers who had them and
could use them.
When we went into Iraq, after literally months during which we could
have prepared to have had adequate equipment for our troops, we sent
our soldiers into battle without this protection; and Mr. Speaker, it
took Mr. Rumsfeld and the Pentagon, and, yeah, the buck stops in the
Oval Office, the President, one full year from March when the war began
until March of this year before they were able to send me a letter
informing me that, at last, all of our troops were equipped with this
body armor.
I asked how many young men or middle-age Reservists and Guardsmen may
have lost their lives needlessly simply because this administration did
not provide them with this basic protection. It is a question that I
think needs to be analyzed and answered.
There is a continuing problem in the war zone. As I stand here in the
Chamber of the people's House tonight, there are American soldiers in
Iraq, in various cities in Iraq, who are using vehicles without proper
armor. There is one company that the Pentagon has a contract with to
provide up-armored Humvees for our military personnel. It is located in
Fairfield, Ohio. It is called O'Gara-Hess and Eisenhardt. It is the
company that has the ability and the contract with the Pentagon to
produce these vehicles which provide a high degree of protection when
our soldiers may drive over a roadside bomb, for example; and yet the
Pentagon is only contracting for 300 of these up-armored Humvees per
month, although thousands are needed in Iraq.
The company tells me that they are capable by November, if not
sooner, of producing some 500 of these Humvees per month. What that
means is if the President and the Secretary of Defense and those who
make decisions regarding this matter at the Pentagon were willing to do
so, they could have these up-armored vehicles in Iraq so that our
troops would be protected much more quickly than they are willing to
do.
I do not understand this. I simply do not understand why the
President does not call Secretary Rumsfeld up and say, listen, there
are reports that our troops need up-armored Humvees; I want this
problem solved as quickly as possible. Do everything necessary; move
heaven and Earth but get this problem solved.
A young West Point graduate from my district called me a few weeks
ago. He had returned after spending 14 months in Iraq; and he said,
Congressman, the Explorer you drive around is more armored and offers
better protection than did the Humvee that I drove around the streets
of Baghdad.
It troubles me that those of us who serve here in this Chamber and
the President, who is the Commander in Chief, would allow this
situation to continue when they can do something about it.
So if the President cannot think of any mistake he has made, I would
offer this mistake. I would say to the President, you should not have
sent our soldiers into battle without body armor, and you should not
have our soldiers over there tonight without up-armored Humvees to
provide them adequate protection.
____________________