[Congressional Record Volume 150, Number 45 (Friday, April 2, 2004)]
[House]
[Page H2135]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE MONEY IS THERE FOR EXTENDING UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Strickland) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. STRICKLAND. Mr. Speaker, we are going to be leaving Washington,
D.C. this afternoon and going back to our home districts, and it
saddens me that we are leaving Washington without extending the
unemployment benefits that are so desperately needed by so many
unemployed Americans.
Just in Ohio alone, since George W. Bush became President of our
country, we have lost 236,000 jobs, and 170,000 of those jobs have been
high-wage jobs with good benefits. Across the Nation, some 3 million
jobs have been lost under the President's watch, making him the first
President since Herbert Hoover to actually have a net loss of jobs
during his tenure as President. That makes it all the more troubling to
me that with so much job loss in our country and so many unemployed
workers in my State of Ohio, that we would leave Washington, D.C. for
this extended vacation without extending unemployment benefits to our
unemployed constituents.
The fact is that in Ohio alone, already, 31,300 workers have
exhausted their benefits; and between now and June, this will be 2,200
workers per week who will have exhausted their unemployment benefits.
In my region of eastern Ohio in the Steubenville area, 380 workers
have already exhausted their benefits; and by the end of June, that
number will swell to 700 workers.
Mr. Speaker, these statistics are not merely numbers; they represent
workers. They represent the heads of households. They represent parents
who need to provide for themselves and their children, to be able to
contribute to their communities and their churches.
That is what we are facing in Ohio. It just is amazing to me that in
light of these circumstances, the President's Treasury Secretary, Mr.
John Snow, came to Ohio last week and he verbally defended the
outsourcing, the sending of American jobs to other countries,
indicating that it strengthens our economy to do so. How can Treasury
Secretary Snow or President Bush come to Ohio and look unemployed
people in the eye and tell them that they care about them when they
deny them these needed resources?
The money is there, Mr. Speaker. What I am suggesting and calling for
will not result in an increase in taxes. There are multiple billions of
dollars in the unemployment fund, money that has been placed there by
workers and employees for just such a time as this. Yet it seems to me
that perhaps out of an insensitivity to what is really happening, and
unawareness of the tragedy of unemployment, or maybe a hardness of
heart, this House and this administration will not support the
extension of these benefits. I assume it is because if we extended the
benefits it would be an admission that we have not solved the problem
of joblessness in this country. Maybe we do not want to add to the
accounting that would increase the amount of the deficit. But I want to
tell my colleagues, the leadership of this House and the President of
the United States have no hesitancy in increasing the deficit if it is
necessary in order to give tax breaks to the richest people in this
country.
Think of this: here we are leaving Washington, D.C. today, going home
and knowing that there are thousands and thousands of unemployed
workers who are, on a weekly basis, exhausting their benefits, and who,
through no fault of their own, they have lost their jobs.
{time} 1415
But through the resources of this government we can help them. We
could lessen the pain that they feel. We could make it possible for
them to continue to provide the needed resources for their families.
And, yet, we are turning our back on them in their hour of need.
I hope that when President Bush comes to Ohio for his next visit the
constituents in Ohio will ask him, Mr. President, why were you
unwilling to support an extension of unemployment benefits to those who
are out of work?
____________________