[Congressional Record Volume 150, Number 45 (Friday, April 2, 2004)]
[House]
[Page H2066]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




    MAKING IN ORDER CONSIDERATION OF PETRI AMENDMENT DURING FURTHER 
  CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 3550, TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT: A LEGACY FOR 
                                 USERS

  Mr. PETRI. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that during further 
consideration of H.R. 3550, pursuant to House Resolution 593, it shall 
be in order to consider, prior to any other amendment, the amendment 
that I have placed at the desk as though printed as an amendment 
printed in part B of House Report 108-456, to be debatable for not to 
exceed 10 minutes, equally divided and controlled between myself and 
the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Oberstar).
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will report the amendment.
  The Clerk read as follows:

              Amendment to H.R. 3350, Offered by Mr. Petri

       Page 548, lines 6 and 7, strike ``Jefferson Davis 
     Transitway (Columbia Pike to Pentagon)'' and insert `Crystal 
     City Potomac Yards Transit''.
       Page 548, after line 7, insert the following (and 
     redesignate subsequent paragraphs accordingly):
       (99) Northern Virginia--Columbia Pike Rapid Transit 
     Project.
       In the table contained in section 3038 of the bill, in item 
     number 25--
       (1) strike ``$240,000.00'' and insert ``$912,000.00'';
       (2) strike ``$247,500.00'' and insert ``$940,500.00''; and
       (3) strike ``$262,500.00'' and insert ``$997,500.00''.
       In the table contained in section 3038 of the bill, in item 
     number 26--
       (1) strike ``$240,000.00'' and insert ``$912,000.00'';
       (2) strike ``$247,500.00'' and insert ``$940,500.00''; and
       (3) strike ``$262,500.00'' and insert ``$997,500.00''.

  Mr. PETRI (during the reading). Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent 
that the amendment be considered as read and printed in the Record.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Wisconsin?
  There was no objection.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the original request 
of the gentleman from Wisconsin?
  There was no objection.

                          ____________________