[Congressional Record Volume 150, Number 42 (Tuesday, March 30, 2004)]
[House]
[Page H1718]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
GASOLINE PRICE HIKES
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Pallone) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. PALLONE. Mr. Speaker, gasoline prices have hit an all-time high.
The national average for gasoline is now $1.77 per gallon, up 25 cents
from the beginning of the year; and President Bush is doing nothing to
alleviate the strain that this is taking on the American people, on
American businesses and on the American economy.
Mr. Speaker, high gas prices impact all of us, consumers and
businesses alike. High fuel costs translate into a loss in profits
margins for the manufacturing and transportation sectors that force
prices for products and services higher, hitting American consumers
twice. Not only do Americans need to dole out more cash to fill their
gas tanks with the little disposable income they have left, they are
forced to pay higher prices for goods and services.
{time} 1845
For instance, Continental Airlines sought to impose a fuel surcharge
for their services. And the real impact of all this is a slowdown in
the economy with the potential for even more job loss. In fact, an
estimate by Merrill Lynch shows that every penny increase in gasoline
prices at the pump is equal to $1 billion in lost consumer spending.
That is nearly $25 billion in lost spending since the beginning of the
year.
Furthermore, Merrill Lynch estimates that while Federal tax refunds
would total $55 billion from February to May this year, a 30 percent
increase from last year, and theoretically give the economy a nudge,
higher pump prices will wipe out as much as half of the positive
economic impact that these Federal refunds might have had.
Mr. Speaker, I would like to point out, too, that this is happening
on the watch of an administration that said they would make energy
policy a priority in the United States. Yet more than 3 years after
President Bush first stepped in the White House, we have no national
energy policy, and we have no national energy policy because the bill
that the White House presented to Congress was filled with an
extraordinary collection of energy industry giveaways, crafted by the
members of Vice President Cheney's secret energy task force, instead of
meaningful policies that would increase fuel efficiency and the use of
renewable and alternative energy sources.
Mr. Speaker, there are two things that President Bush must do
immediately. First, he must hold off placing more oil in the Strategic
Petroleum Reserve until prices come down. The SPR, or the Strategic
Petroleum Reserve, is a power tool that the President can and should
use in times of need, and right now consumers need relief. If President
Bush reduced the amount of oil placed in the petroleum reserve, we
would have more on the market driving prices down for Americans now.
The SPR can then be replenished when oil prices are lower.
Second, Mr. Speaker, President Bush needs to get on the phone with
OPEC and demand increased oil production. Recent news indicates that
OPEC has hinted at plans to lower production by 1 million barrels per
day after April 1; and the administration's response to this from
Secretary Abraham is that the U.S., and I quote, ``will not beg OPEC
for oil.'' That is a different tune than the one that candidate Bush
sang during the 2000 election. Four years ago on the campaign trail,
President Bush, in a swipe at President Clinton, said, ``What I think
the President ought to do is he ought to get on the phone with the OPEC
cartel and say, we expect you to open your spigots and the President of
the United States must jawbone OPEC members to lower the price.'' Mr.
President, put your action where your mouth is and insist that OPEC
increase production now to alleviate the strain these high gasoline
prices are having on the American people and the American economy.
Mr. Speaker, we cannot afford to lose more jobs because of the
President's inability to address this problem. He needs to address it
now, and I think we should continue to take issue with it and bring it
up on the floor until he does.
____________________