[Congressional Record Volume 150, Number 42 (Tuesday, March 30, 2004)]
[House]
[Page H1646]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
NEGLECT OF NATION'S FINANCES THREATENS AMERICA
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the order of the House of
January 20, 2004, the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Smith) is recognized
during morning hour debates for 5 minutes.
Mr. SMITH of Michigan. Mr. Speaker, this year we celebrate Abraham
Lincoln's 195th birthday. In his famous address at Gettysburg, he noted
that ``our fathers brought forth on this continent a new Nation
conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are
created equal.'' The Civil War was ``testing whether that Nation, our
Nation or any Nation so conceived and so dedicated can long endure.''
Now, that challenge is with us. Today, we face a threat to the
country that may well be as serious. It lies not in the dramatic clash
of arms, but in neglect of our Nation's finances, especially our long-
term finances.
Voters vote for benefits, and politicians promise them without
knowing how to pay for it. Just 4 months ago, Congress voted for a
prescription drug benefit that adds $16 trillion to the program's
unfunded liability. That is over two times our total national entire
debt, and it was done mostly for short-term political gain with little
reform of the underlying program. There is now a call from some Members
proclaiming that the budget we are now working on for 2005 that is
actually twice an increase in government, twice the rate of inflation
is not enough and we should have more spending to increase taxes
eventually. There are very few in Congress who are willing to resist
the continual pressure to spend; and I think part of that, Mr. Speaker,
is because of the fact that most citizens today now pay less in income
tax than they get from government services, so it is easy to ask for
more.
From the founding of this country, it took until 1975 to amass a debt
of $500 billion. Unfortunately, we are now adding more debt to our
books every year than we did over the first 199-year history of this
country. The deficit for fiscal year 2003 was $536 billion, $631
billion this year, and another $534 billion expected for next year. We
have never run a deficit this high, and we need to take decisive action
in this budget to address our overspending.
This kind of spending means that higher taxes are coming, maybe not
in the next year or two, but eventually. The same Congress that could
not bring itself to add a few real reforms to Medicare in a gigantic
benefit expansion bill is not likely to cut benefits to the degree
necessary to head off financial crisis until the disaster is on us.
I take some comfort from a new willingness among many members of the
Republican Conference to tighten our line on spending. Though some
Members expressed concern about cuts in an election year, a strong
majority have insisted that we reduce spending. There is general
cooperation and agreement that we should spend less, not tax more, and
we will see if that determination translates into effective spending
restraint.
Joining with colleagues who share our concern about government
overspending, we will reimpose discretionary spending caps which were
in effect from the early 1980s through the surplus period of the late
1990s. It is important, Mr. Speaker, that Congress work hard to cut out
unnecessary waste and abuse. We also need to make very hard decisions
to prioritize spending.
Another aspect of the solution, I think, is improving the honesty of
government accounting. I have a bill to require the CBO and the OMB to
include unfunded liabilities in their budget projections. This unfunded
liability is now projected to be $71 trillion, $71 trillion that our
kids and our grandkids are eventually going to have to finance, pay the
interest on, and start paying it back.
Some people have said that we should not worry so much about unfunded
liability because it can be wiped out by reforms, but Congress has
shown little political will to deal with the problem. Perhaps making it
more visible will help bring about some of the reforms that will be
necessary to come to grips with the problem.
Congress and the President can redeem their record on spending to a
large degree if they push hard for Social Security reform. It would be
nice to do it before the election. Maybe we can do it after the
election, but it remains to be seen whether we will take on that fight.
It will be a fight because steeply progressive taxes and big government
have combined to form a powerful electoral block. Here, again, the
bottom 50 percent of earners now pay virtually no income tax and,
therefore, have little will.
Empires decline when they fail to act on fundamental problems, and I
wonder at times if we are not too distracted by the endless scandals
and the horse race politics of our media culture to grab what is best
for our country.
____________________