[Congressional Record Volume 150, Number 41 (Monday, March 29, 2004)]
[House]
[Pages H1595-H1596]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
OTHER PEOPLE'S ELECTIONS
Mr. STEARNS. Madam Speaker, today I reflect on some of the recent
elections held in other countries. While citizens of other countries
may have different values about the level of government intervention in
areas, let us say in economics or labor rights, overwhelmingly, most
citizens of the world would prefer to live in a democracy than a
totalitarian-run system. This was presented last summer by the Pew
Research Center for the People in the Press. Pew Research Center
interviewed over 66,000 people in 44 countries over 2 years. The
majority demonstrated strong preferences in democratic governments,
even in Muslim countries.
Over the past 3 weeks, other people have elected leaders, sometimes
new, sometimes the incumbent. I wish for all, of course, to live under
the same sunshine of freedom that we in the United States have here.
In Taiwan Saturday, March 20, incumbent President Chen, Taiwan's pro-
independence leader, was declared to have won by a slim margin, just a
hair over 50 percent. This election was preceded by threats from
mainland China and Chen's international detractors, and jittery nerves
by many who urged ``don't rock the boat.'' On election eve, President
Chen and his Vice President were shot in a craven attack.
The aftermath of the election is a little calmer: there are street
protests and a recount is imminent. Also, in a win for China, though,
election authorities nullified the results of a controversial
referendum championed by the President because too few voters took part
in it.
However, I still see some optimism. The apparent reelection of Chen
is sending a message both to Beijing and Washington: while not outright
declaring independence, China's people are standing up for their status
as a sovereign body; they are not completely buying into Beijing's
domineering ``One China'' policy. Further, I find it telling that while
an insufficient number voted in the referendum, of those who did, 90
percent pulled the yes lever to the two questions: one, whether to try
to set up a framework for direct talks with China; and, two, whether to
buy more advanced weapons if China refuses to move missiles aimed at
their island. I wish President Chen every success in my support of his
leading his people to a democracy.
Now, let us look at Spain. I understand the emotional and political
tumult in which Spain found themselves on March 11 and after. However,
I am discouraged that circumstances influenced the election the way
they did, for the singular reason that the Spaniards appear to think
that the Socialist Party will bring them relief from the retributions
of extreme Islamic fundamentalists. I sadly believe they are wrong.
Gustavo de Aristegui wrote in The Washington Post on Sunday, March 21:
``In 1984, I had a long talk with a high-ranking Sunni cleric in a
mosque in Damascus. He was very friendly when he learned that I was a
Spaniard. After 2 hours of conversation about politics and theology,
which are very much intertwined in that part of the world, he said to
me: `Don't worry, we will liberate Spain from Western corruption.' ''
The writer emphasized that this was a moderate, respected clergyman.
Now, that is a chilling, foreshadowing, looking into the minds of those
who would destroy that way of life in Spain.
Yet, what did Spaniards sacrifice in their election of the Socialist
Party candidate? Since 1986, the Partido Popular turned from 21 percent
unemployment down to 9 percent, foreign debt from 80 percent to less
than 50 percent GDP, a deficit of 6.7 percent of GDP in 1996 to a 0.5
percent surplus in 2002, and a growing economy while much of the world
experienced a downturn. This is the stuff that democracies are made of:
living economically securely, planning futures, and thriving.
Like President Chen, I support our ally Spain and the new leadership
that they have openly and fairly chosen. I only ponder that democracies
also value economic prosperity, and capitulation to bullies may
compromise that for which they have worked.
Heading east, President Putin won reelection in Russia this month. He
has promised to translate his landslide reelection into concrete
reforms: modernizing the economy, the bureaucracy,
[[Page H1596]]
the banking system, utilities, health and social services. Last Monday
President Bush called him to congratulate him and urge him to follow
through on his reforms, to move forward towards his promises of market-
based and democratic reform.
Madam Speaker, let us hope so. Like the leader of Taiwan, the leader
of Spain, I wish the leader of Russia, President Putin, success; but I
will define success as: how free are your people?
____________________