[Congressional Record Volume 150, Number 33 (Tuesday, March 16, 2004)]
[House]
[Pages H1098-H1099]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentlewoman from Tennessee (Mrs. Blackburn) is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mrs. BLACKBURN. Mr. Speaker, last week there was a quote attributed
to John Kerry, the Democratic nominee for President, who said ``I've
met foreign leaders who can't go out and say this publicly, but, boy,
they look at you and say, `You got to win this; you got to beat this
guy; we need a new policy,' things like that.'' He has not denied the
statement.
[[Page H1099]]
Quite frankly, whether the statement is accurate or not, and I do not
believe it to be accurate, America's foreign policy decisions are not
designed to win popularity contests. They are designed to protect and
defend America, her citizens, and her allies.
In the days since September 11, there have been those who actually
seem to believe that if we had been more understanding of extremist
regimes and terrorists that perhaps they would have left us alone.
There is a troubling trend in this campaign season. It has become
almost formulaic, and we are hearing it from everybody, from the
Democratic Presidential candidates on down. Criticize the President,
criticize our foreign policy, criticize our country, criticize what we
offer, and do it as loudly and as often as they can.
The alternative to President Bush's bold, tough foreign policy that
puts terrorists and rogue regimes on the run is one that relies on the
international community to take collective action. We have been there.
We spent 12 years letting the U.N. throw paper at Saddam Hussein while
Saddam's military launched missiles at our pilots, at American pilots
enforcing the U.N. no-fly zones over Iraq. For 12 years the U.N. turned
a blind eye while such as France allowed its citizens to profit from
the Iraq Oil for Food or, as some call it, the Oil for Palaces Program.
International consensus, multilateralism? These are terms the policy
wonks and the intellectual elites love to use. They are terms that
sound great on paper, but an unyielding dedication to them has proven
disastrous in the real world. Multilateralism and collective action are
terms that we in the real world know to mean that America should stop
leading and let the status quo remain. Those who profited from a status
quo that allowed Saddam to remain in power, that allowed terrorists to
grow and flourish in Afghanistan do not want us to act.
{time} 1945
Nations that have neither the will nor the military capability to
take on terrorism on a truly global scale should not criticize those
that do.
It was 3,000 Americans, our buildings, our Pentagon that were
targeted on September 11, and those responsible needed to know that we
were going to do more than lob a few missiles. We have taken steps to
reshape the world for the better, and whether this pleases the French
is irrelevant. We alone have the capability and the responsibility to
stamp out terrorism, and it is to President Bush's credit that he was
not deterred by apologists for terrorists and Saddam.
Should America make a turn backward, back to the days when
multilateralism and collective action were more important than
promoting freedom and targeting terrorism, when we relied on the U.N.
to slap dictators on the wrist and sit idly by as Afghanistan became a
giant terrorist training camp? If we take that step back, then we are
signifying our weakness.
The debate is very clear: Do you prefer that we act preemptively to
prevent another September 11? Do you believe swift, decisive action in
lands breeding terrorism is preferable to emergency response on the
streets of our cities in the aftermath of an attack? Do you want
American foreign policy dictated by your elected leaders or those in
Europe?
I think the answer to this is clear. We all know the answer to this
and, certainly, when we read polls like this one from the Iraqi people
who say their life is better today than it was a year ago, we know the
answer to that question.
____________________