[Congressional Record Volume 150, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 21, 2004)]
[House]
[Page H62]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
REGARDING THE NEW MEDICARE LAW
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Brown) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. BROWN of Ohio. Mr. Speaker, in last year's State of the Union
address, President Bush called Medicare ``the binding commitment of a
caring society.'' Last night in his State of the Union address, the
President said the Medicare prescription drug bill that was enacted
last year ``kept a basic commitment to our seniors.''
The new Medicare law kept a basic commitment all right, but as the
tens of thousands of seniors who have quit AARP would likely agree, the
commitment was not to America's seniors. The new Medicare law means an
additional $139 billion in profit to the drug industry over the next 8
years. The President did fulfill his commitment, a commitment he had to
the drug industry. The new Medicare bill the President signed means an
additional $14 billion in subsidies to the insurance industry over the
next 10 years, again a commitment the President fulfilled to his
insurance company backers and contributors. But the President's
commitment meant virtually nothing to seniors, many of whom will not
have access to any benefit until 2006 and after that will have access
to only a very inadequate drug benefit. The new benefit will cover less
than half of a senior's drug costs. The average senior would do better
traveling to Canada to purchase her prescription drugs. Of course the
Bush administration has been busy pressuring Canadian pharmacies to
stop selling medicine to American consumers.
Again, the President's commitment to the drug companies won out. The
reason drug prices are lower in Canada is because the Canadian
government negotiates price with the drug industry. But the new
Medicare law expressly forbids the U.S. Government from negotiating
with the drug industry to bring drug prices down. Get that. This new
drug bill prohibits the government from using its buying power,
representing 40 million Medicare beneficiaries, this new law prohibits
the government from negotiating with the drug industry to bring prices
down. That is why the drug industry's profits are set to explode under
the President's new Medicare privatization bill. Again, it is a
commitment not to America's seniors but a commitment President Bush
made to his drug company contributors. If seniors had asked the
President and the Congress to shortchange them on drug coverage while
giving the drug industry a free ride, it would be accurate to say that
yes, he really has fulfilled his commitment to them, but that is
clearly not what seniors asked us to do.
Medicare HMOs enjoyed a 118 percent increase in profits last year.
Yet we are about to hand them an additional $14.3 billion. According to
the General Accounting Office, we already overpay HMOs by 20 percent.
This new law will ensure we shower them with more money, we waste even
more taxpayer dollars subsidizing the insurance industry, again a
commitment to the insurance industry and the President's financial
contributors in the insurance industry and HMOs, a commitment he made
to them when they were so supportive in his campaign.
Mr. Speaker, in the end, we have a President who always consistently
makes a choice. If it is a choice between corporate interests and the
public interest, this President chooses corporate interests every
single time.
____________________