[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 174 (Tuesday, November 25, 2003)]
[Senate]
[Pages S15949-S15950]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                         HELP AMERICA VOTE ACT

  Mr. BOND. Mr. President, earlier today I spoke briefly about the need 
to get our appropriations bills, many of which are now included in the 
so-called omnibus appropriations measure--some of us think it is an 
``ominous'' appropriations measure--passed prior to the end of calendar 
year 2003. Among the things I pointed out were some very important 
measures. This body passed something called the Help America Vote Act, 
which I think focused attention on two very important problems. My 
colleagues on the other side of the aisle wanted to make sure we had 
up-to-date voting machines to make sure everyone who was entitled to 
vote could vote to remove barriers to voting. We supported that.
  We also got support for something I thought was very important as 
well, and that was to stop the rampant fraud that has come back as a 
result of postcard registration.
  I have the honor of representing an area that has probably the 
dubious distinction of being one of the vote fraud centers perhaps in 
the universe. The city of St. Louis, as I have said many times before, 
is famous for voting rolls clogged with people registered one, two, 
three, even four times; vacant lots with small cities worth of 
registered voters; and even my favorite dog, Ritzy Meckler, a 13-year-
old Springer Spaniel who was registered there.
  We have had some great theological experiences. For the last general 
election, a very prominent and outstanding alderman of the city of St. 
Louis registered to vote on the 10th anniversary of his death. It is a 
wonderful theological statement. It does not do much

[[Page S15950]]

for me as a political scientist, but he registered by postcard.
  After the 2000 election, when we found tremendous vote fraud problems 
in St. Louis, they had a mayoral election scheduled for the spring of 
2001. The last day of registration, 3,000 postcards showed up to 
register voters for that election. It did not take long for observant 
election officials to note that all of those cards appeared to be in 
the handwriting of one or two people. They started checking and they 
found that, lo and behold, there were a lot of phony people registered.
  Terribly, the deceased mother of the prosecuting attorney of the city 
of St. Louis was registered to vote. This brought about some action. 
Several of the people involved in that little process came together and 
decided to destroy the records. Since that time, I have read in the 
paper that the prosecuting attorney in St. Louis has filed significant 
criminal indictments for those people.
  However, I am proud to say that the St. Louis City election board is 
using new laws passed in the State of Missouri to tighten up on these 
postcard registrations. Prior to the Help America Vote Act, you 
couldn't even check on people who registered by mail. The process for 
getting voters off the list, if they are improperly registered, was 
byzantine, and took years to do. But under the Federal standards, there 
are still areas where these nonexistent or duplication voter 
registrations can be made by mail.
  We provided new powers and new responsibilities for local election 
officials in the Help America Vote Act. We promised to fund them. So 
during the process of debate on the appropriations bills, Senator Dodd 
of Connecticut, Senator McConnell of Kentucky, the Chair, and the 
ranking member of the Rules Committee, when this passed, came to the 
floor and I supported them. We got over $1 billion to fund the Help 
America Vote Act. That languishes in the omnibus appropriations bill. 
That money is necessary to support local efforts to carry out the 
mandates under the Help America Vote Act.
  We all thought that once we passed that law we were going to ensure 
honest elections in 2004, elections where everybody entitled to vote 
could vote. The problem is, if we don't get around to passing the 
funding for the Help America Vote Act until we come back next year, the 
process drags on and on and we are probably into March before the money 
goes out--which is too late to make many of the changes and to build 
the infrastructure and to buy the equipment that is needed to carry out 
the requirements of the Help America Vote Act.
  I have talked with other Senators about the many important measures 
that are included in that Omnibus Appropriations Act. But I want to 
call the attention of my colleagues to some further information that I 
have developed about the Veterans Affairs budget.
  Senator Mikulski and I fought long and hard to get the funding that 
we needed to try to catch up to the backlog in the VA. People with 
service-related injuries, permanent disabilities, low-income people, 
homeless people, are being denied, for months, the ability to get in to 
see a doctor because so many new enrollees have come into the system. 
This body expanded the eligibility. We expanded the eligibility, but 
the money has not kept up. So we are trying to play catchup, and there 
is an additional $2.9 billion above this year's funding level for the 
VA that cannot begin until the bill is signed. We are already a couple 
of months into the fiscal year 2004. We would be 6 or 7 months in 
before we could get funding if we wait until next year.
  My staff tells me there are a number of other things that will 
happen. Specifically, noninstitutional long-term care cannot be 
increased. The VA has placed a high priority, providing a high quality 
of life, long-term care for each veteran. The VA planned to expand the 
program by over 20 percent this year because of the demand. The VA, 
without these funds, will not be able to expand the long-term care 
services under the fiscal year 2003 funding authority.
  Second, pharmacy costs will continue eating the budget. For fiscal 
year 2003, pharmacy costs rose over 11 percent and the VA is incurring 
increasing demands for prescriptions each month. The continuing rise in 
demand for prescriptions is stripping funds from other priority areas 
as VA continues to operate under last year's funding levels.
  Third, new community-based outpatient clinics will be curtailed. The 
VA has 48 high-priority community-based outpatient clinics ready to go 
that can't move forward because they don't have the funds under the 
continuing resolution.

  Finally and most important, and something I hope will be significant 
to each one of us here, the waiting lists will continue to lengthen. 
Continued operations under a continuing resolution will force VA to 
curtail hiring of new physicians and nurses. The VA experiences about a 
1-percent normal attrition rate of physicians per month. By January, 
VA's waiting list will rise by over 10,000 from the projected level.
  VA patients, who should be getting our top priority attention, are 
going to find the waiting list longer. That is why I renew my appeal to 
the leaders on both sides to deal with the omnibus appropriations, to 
come to some agreement, either to take this on UC, or take it by voice 
vote, with the distinguished chairman and ranking member on our side 
and the other side to come to closure on it, or, if need be, bring us 
back in session.
  The House is going to come back into session on December 8, I 
understand, and vote on the bill. We have an obligation to come in--
either if there is a unanimous consent agreement granted to do it by 
voice vote or if there is not--and do what we are paid to do and that 
is to vote up or down and pass the appropriations that are so essential 
for many areas where continuing resolution funding will be inadequate.
  I urge the leadership to work on this. We need it in many areas.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mrs. Dole). The Senator from New Mexico.
  Mr. BINGAMAN. I thank the Chair.
  (The remarks of Mr. Bingaman pertaining to the introduction of S. 
1966 are located in today's Record under ``Statements on Introduced 
Bills and Joint Resolutions.'')
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Texas.
  Mr. CORNYN. Madam President, I have some remarks I would like to make 
shortly, but I know Senator Lautenberg got here before I did. He told 
me he had about 10 minutes. I know the majority leader may have some 
remarks, and, of course, I would defer to him.
  Unless there is objection, I would like to ask--well, I will just 
defer to the majority leader at this time.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The majority leader.
  Mr. FRIST. Madam President, if I could just take 3 or 4 minutes, and 
then I know the distinguished Senator from New Jersey has his comments 
to make.

                          ____________________