[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 167 (Tuesday, November 18, 2003)]
[House]
[Page H11364]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AL QAEDA AND IRAQ
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the order of the House of
January 7, 2003, the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Stearns) is recognized
during morning hour debates for 5 minutes.
Mr. STEARNS. Mr. Speaker, with each passing day, the President's
critics become more emboldened in their attacks on what they decry as a
misleading impetus to go to war. According to the information they are
able to ascertain from 24-hour news channels and the New York Times,
they continue to condemn the President's claim that Saddam Hussein had
links to al Qaeda.
We have all heard their diatribes accusing the President of invading
Iraq with little or no evidence that Saddam Hussein worked along Osama
bin Laden. I recommend the recent article in the Weekly Standard's
current issue that details the memo written in response to the
administration's prewar intelligence. It is clear evidence of the nexus
of terrorism with terrorist-sponsoring states that many antiwar
advocates deny exists at all.
According to this memo, dated October 27, 2003, bin Laden and Saddam
Hussein had an operational relationship from the early 1990s to 2003
that involved training in explosives, weapons of mass destruction,
logistical support for terrorist attacks, al Qaeda training camps, safe
haven in Iraq, and Iraq financial support for al Qaeda.
Mr. Speaker, the findings put forth in the memo come from a variety
of domestic and foreign agencies including the FBI, the Defense
Intelligence Agency, the CIA, and the National Security Agency. Much of
the evidence is detailed, conclusive, and corroborated by multiple
sources.
Some of it is new information obtained in interviews with high-level
Al Qaeda terrorists and Iraqi officials and some reaches back a decade.
Not surprisingly, the picture that emerges is one of long-standing
collaboration between two of America's most grave enemies. According to
the memo which lays out the intelligence in 50 numbered points, Iraq-al
Qaeda contacts began in 1990 and continued through mid-March 2003, days
before the Iraq war began. So in effect, Mr. Speaker, this information
has been accumulated over three administrations.
The relationship began shortly before the first Gulf War. According
to the memo, bin Laden sent emissaries to Jordan in 1990 to meet with
Iraqi government officials. At some unspecified point in 1991,
according to CIA analysis, Iraq sought Saddam's assistance to establish
links to al Qaeda. Both parties were equally interested in developing
that relationship and according to the CIA reporting memo, bin Laden
wanted to expand his organization's abilities through ties in Iraq.
The cumulative weight of the intelligence is compelling. Even The
Washington Post recommends that its readers examine the evidence and
decide for themselves. The notion that the pragmatic Saddam Hussein,
who had grown closer and closer to extreme terrorists in the 1990s,
would avoid any contact with al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden is not a
reasonable conclusion to draw. The alliance is a natural one. With al
Qaeda now claiming responsibility for the recent attacks on synagogues
in Turkey, we are reminded of our duty to respond.
Were the President to have completely ignored this information, the
world would have to face potentially horrifying consequences. Yet
today's critics seem eager to claim even after 9/11 the administration
should only have acted against Saddam if it has proven beyond any
reasonable doubt that he, Saddam, was in league with al Qaeda.
Hopefully, this report provides the evidence that is needed to make
this link. This information is reaffirming our need to topple Saddam.
After so many years of complacency, weakness, and denial, the President
made the decision to oust Saddam. He took the action, the action that
was vital to protect our country.
____________________