[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 161 (Friday, November 7, 2003)]
[Senate]
[Pages S14227-S14228]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
UNANIMOUS CONSENT REQUEST--H.R. 2799
Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that at a time
determined by the majority leader, after consultation with the
Democratic leader, the Senate proceed to the consideration of H.R.
2799, the Commerce-Justice-State appropriations bill.
The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Is there objection?
Mr. REID. Mr. President, reserving the right to object, I ask the
majority leader--we have, of course, Senator Hollings, the ranking
member of the subcommittee, who has asked, at what time do you propose
going to that, today or at some other time?
Mr. FRIST. The plan would be to go to it after we finish the Internet
tax bill. So we would like to go to that bill today. If it is very
late, of course, we will start early Monday morning.
Mr. REID. I respectfully say to my distinguished friend that we are
not going to finish the Internet tax bill today. I guess we can finish
it by taking it off the floor. On our side there are a significant
number of amendments, and we know there are some on your side. Simply,
I ask the leader what time does he propose, in effect, that we have had
enough talk on the Internet tax bill, because it is not going to be
completed today.N O T I C E
Effective January 1, 2004, the subscription price of the
Congressional Record will be $503 per year or $252 for six months.
Individual issues may be purchased at the following costs: Less
than 200 pages, $10.50; Between 200 and 400 pages, $21.00; Greater
than 400 pages, $31.50. Subscriptions in microfiche format will be
$146 per year with single copies priced at $3.00. This price
increase is necessary based upon the cost of printing and
distribution.
BRUCE
R. JAMES, Public Printer.
[[Page S14228]]
Mr. FRIST. Again, people were here very late last night. I encourage
the managers to do everything humanly possible to finish the Internet
tax bill. If, after aggressive work, we cannot do that, then we can
make a decision. By the end of today, I would like to lay down the
Commerce-Justice-State appropriations bill. If that is the case, I
would plan on going to that on Monday. We can talk about the
appropriate time. For us to finish our work, we have to keep moving,
and it is important to lay down that bill today.
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I say to the majority leader we want to
cooperate. We have tried to do that on these appropriations bills, and
we will cooperate on Commerce-State-Justice. But until there is some
determination made when we are going to go off the Internet tax, I am
going to object.
The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Objection is heard.
Mr. McCAIN. Will the majority leader yield?
Mr. FRIST. I am happy to yield.
Mr. McCAIN. Mr. President, I point out that we went on to the
Internet tax moratorium bill last night with the anticipation of
amendments being proposed and votes starting this morning--stacked
votes. That is what we usually do on a Thursday evening. Whether that
is a good idea or a bad one, it is a very common practice. We had
anticipated at least three amendments and then stacked votes this
morning and moving forward with the bill.
Then, I was told later in the evening there would be one amendment
that would be proposed and we would stack it for this morning; and not
too late last night, the sponsors of the amendment said they were going
to file the amendment and debate it this morning.
With all due respect, that is not the way we usually do business
here. We tell people what we are going to do and go with their word and
move forward. I think we need to get this done because the Internet tax
moratorium has expired. If we don't want the Internet tax moratorium to
prevail, that is a decision to be made by the body. We should make the
decision. I hope the majority leader will stick with his comments.
There are not that many items of dispute on the Internet tax
moratorium. It has been debated on several occasions in past years. So
I hope relevant amendments--and I don't think there are more than two
or three, to be honest--are offered and we can move forward with those
with a reasonable debate time and dispose of this today, understanding
that all Members have the problem of scheduling and want to leave.
So I urge the cooperation of all Members so we can dispose of
important amendments and move forward. I see my colleague from North
Dakota who is ready to speak. I wish he had been here last night to
speak. We could have done an amendment and debated it. Instead, we put
it off for this morning, which I hope will make comments more
abbreviated so we can move to the substance of the amendment and
passage of the bill.
I thank the leader and I appreciate his commitment to try to get this
done today.
Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, let me close this out and then we can turn
to the bill. I ask all of our colleagues to spend the appropriate time
and do our best to cooperate to finish this important bill, which I
tried very hard to finish last week with the understanding that we
would bring it up this week and we would finish it this week. We cannot
point fingers on either side of the aisle because there are challenges
on both sides of the aisle. I ask this in order for us to finish the
Nation's business.
Last night on the floor--I know we have the Syria accountability bill
and Military Construction, which we are going to get. The problem is
that we have to finish the business we have on the floor. We have to
continue the appropriations process as we go forward, and we cannot do
it unless people come together and understand there is an urgency that
requires cooperation.
I go back to my original comments. I understand there is objection to
going to Commerce-Justice-State. I will continue to discuss that as the
day goes forward. I would like to lay that down today at some point.
____________________