[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 153 (Tuesday, October 28, 2003)]
[House]
[Page H9972]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
SUPPORTING THE FALLEN PATRIOTS TAX RELIEF ACT
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentlewoman from Indiana (Ms. Carson) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Ms. CARSON of Indiana. Mr. Speaker, I do not want to be redundant in
terms of the eloquence of my predecessor, the gentleman from
Massachusetts (Mr. McGovern), and what he has already so adequately
articulated, but I rise in support of what was initially the McGovern
bill, referred to as the Fallen Patriots Tax Relief Act, and I will
support, of course, the Renzi bill, which I understand will be
considered on the floor tomorrow, also known as the Fallen Patriots Tax
Relief Bill.
Mr. Speaker, I want to commend the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr.
McGovern) for bringing this subject matter to the ears and eyes of
America, and particularly to the House of Representatives, which has
responsibility for its passage. The bill will increase the military
benefit to $12,000 and make it tax exempt, an idea certainly that is
long overdue in terms of its implementation.
We cannot be concerned about the cost of the bill. I have been
reading the CQ reports and other analyses of what this bill will
eventually cost, particularly that section that suggests that it go
back retroactively to September 11, 2001 and provide exemption for
those who were in the service at that time forward.
Currently 340 American military personnel have lost their lives in
Operation Iraqi Freedom, and 92 in Operation Enduring Freedom in
Afghanistan and in the Philippines. While an examination of the bill
shows it does in fact impose a great cost on the American people, the
cost of the lives cannot be measured in terms of dollars.
The death tax gratuity payment of $6,000, of which $3,000 is taxable,
is proposed to be increased to $12,000 in terms of the gratuity
payment, and the entire amount would be tax-free, which is, of course,
no less than right. The deceased's surviving spouse, parents, children,
brothers and sisters should not have to worry about running afoul of
the IRS because their loved one just lost their life in the line of
duty. The bill also extends the filing deadline for income tax
purposes, an idea, of course, whose time has come and passed.
I want to commend the authors of both bills for bringing this very
needed legislation to the House, Mr. Speaker, and also the fact that it
provides the National Guard and Reserve members an above-the-line tax
deduction for overnight transportation, meals and lodging expenses for
those who travel more than 100 miles.
{time} 2045
The National Guard is indeed a vital aspect of our military operation
of this Nation and should be treated with respect and with the kind of
exemptions that they so rightly deserve.
I understand that the bill also, Mr. Speaker, eliminates the
qualifying 5-year period from capital gains on the sale of the
residence while the taxpayer or taxpayer's spouse serves on qualified
official extended duty as a member of the Armed Forces or the foreign
services.
Again, Mr. Speaker, I am proud that the House of Representatives has
come to this point to rectify an injustice that has existed in law
insofar as it has affected the military men and women who serve and who
sacrifice and so many of them who lose their lives as a result of
preserving the freedom of this Nation. I support the legislation, and I
encourage Members of the House to do likewise.
____________________