[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 144 (Wednesday, October 15, 2003)]
[Senate]
[Pages S12566-S12567]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
IRAQ
Ms. MIKULSKI. Mr. President, I will state some of my principles as we
debate the supplemental appropriations on Iraq.
One year ago, America was on the brink of war. Congress debated then
whether America should go it alone to confront Saddam Hussein or get
international support to bring the world with us. This week, Congress
takes up a nearly similar debate: Do we go it alone or do we find a way
to share the burden and the cost of the war?
Who should pay for the occupation and reconstruction of Iraq?
According to the Bush administration, the answer is the American
taxpayer, to the tune of $87 billion.
I agree that as we consider this debate, we should have four
principles to guide our thinking. First, there must be international
burden sharing. If the stability of Iraq is in the world's interest,
then the world should help pay for the reconstruction. The
administration must be more aggressive in the pursuit of reconstruction
funds from other countries and other international institutions.
Second, wherever possible, American aid should be loans, not
giveaways. Iraq has the world's second largest oil reserves. These oil
fields are capable of pumping out millions of barrels a day. That
should translate into billions of dollars. Those profits should help
with the reconstruction.
Third, we must always be clear that we support our troops. These are
ordinary men and women called to do extraordinary and dangerous and
difficult missions. They put their lives at risk to serve our country.
Our troops need the equipment, the gear, the backup. And their families
need financial support. Military families, with loved ones are in Iraq,
need financial support to make ends meet and the health care they
should get.
Third, the administration must lay out its plan to end the occupation
of Iraq. There was a plan for the war. Now we need a plan for the
peace. The American people deserve full disclosure: a real assessment
of where we are going, how long we will be there. Iraq must not turn
into a quagmire. We cannot pour in our funds and send more troops with
no end in sight.
Last year, when we debated about the war, I said if it is important
enough to the world to go, the world should go with us. I voted to go
to the U.N. to have international legitimacy and international burden
sharing, to share the dangers along with our troops as well as to share
the cost of rebuilding Iraq.
During the debate I said: What is going to happen to our troops? And
I asked it in classified situations and other briefings we received. I
wanted to know if our troops were going to be greeted with a landmine
or with a parade. Well, now we know the answer to that.
Our troops need all the support they can get. I believe we need more
troops, but I do not think we need more American troops; they should
come from other countries.
I believe there is money that needs to be spent in Iraq but not only
our money. I think there needs to be international money. We had a
coalition of the willing. Now we need a coalition of the wallet. Let
them step to the plate to share the financial responsibility to create
stability and a democracy in Iraq.
You bet I am behind our troops. And we want to vote to make sure they
have the help and the assistance they need, not only the right gear. We
understand they do not even have the proper body armor they need.
We also want to support their families here at home. They come back
for 2 weeks for a breather, but their families' hearts are broken as
the men and women go back to the war. We need to support those families
financially, and we need to support those things in terms of health
care.
When it comes to burden sharing, we now know the other countries are
not stepping up. They are tepid. They were timid about the war, and
they are tepid about reconstruction. Only 61 countries have committed
to helping. They have committed $1.5 billion to the reconstruction of
Iraq, according to Ambassador Bremer's testimony. That is not enough.
[[Page S12567]]
But we were also assured by Secretary Rumsfeld that we could get the
money for reconstruction from Iraqi oil. Well, let's get it. I support
the kind of thinking that Senator Dorgan has presented, which is to
replace the $20 billion in grants for Iraqi reconstruction with loans,
and to also create a framework for other nations to participate in
those loans.
On a bipartisan basis, Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison is working on an
amendment to make $10 billion in American aid work via a loan through
the World Bank, a $10 billion loan through the World Bank, with other
nations contributing to the World Bank's Iraq reconstruction trust
fund. That is the kind of thinking we need, and we need to work on a
bipartisan basis. America needs to know we are trying to work on
a bipartisan basis. But I repeat: We need loans, not giveaways.
Now, there are others who say: Oh, my gosh, Iraq is shackled with
debt.
That debt was created by an illegitimate government in Iraq. And who
is the money owed to? Well, the money is owed to Russia, to Saudi
Arabia, to France. Why can't they forgive the debt? Make that their
share. Just forgive the debt. Rather than giving more money, let France
forgive the debt. Let Russia forgive the debt. Let Saudi Arabia forgive
the debt. Let Iraq start with a clean slate and pay back America for
what it is doing.
My constituents in Maryland are very patriotic, and they will do
whatever is necessary to defend this Nation. But they have families and
children to educate, mothers and fathers who are grappling with the
health care costs of being older, retirement plans to do, and homes to
buy. It is not fair to ask the American taxpayer to share the full
burden of fighting this war.
While we are worried about Russia's debt, what about our debt? If we
are worried about Iraq being too burdened with debt, what about our
debt?
Now we need a debt of gratitude for what we are doing around the
world. I think the way it can be repaid is to forgive the Iraqi debt.
Let them start with a clean slate just as they are starting with a
clean government, and move on.
When you look at the way they are spending money on reconstruction,
they have money for schools, they have money for tech centers, they
have money for job training and job centers, water and sewer grants--
all of what we need in our own communities.
We know the people in Iraq have suffered. They have suffered under
Saddam Hussein. They are now suffering under what looks like an
internal civil war going on now among the different tribes.
I know the children need health care, the communities need
electricity, and they need to have an economy to get back on their
feet. But, my gosh, I sure wish some of this money was also being spent
here at home.
The request for Iraq includes 250 tech centers with 20 laptop
computers each, and computer training. They are going to build seven
communities, with 3,500 units of affordable housing. And--guess what--
we are going to build a primary school, two secondary schools, a health
clinic, a place of worship, and a market in each community.
Yet at the same time, HOPE VI and other programs to revitalize
American cities have been zeroed out. Technical centers to get our kids
ready for the new century is sharply reduced. Infrastructure that we
desperately need to protect public health and the environment, such as
water and sewer grants, is so spartan and skimpy in my own VA-HUD bill.
So we have to look at where we are spending our money, and we have to
look at where we are creating debt. If we are creating debt to improve
our economy, to get our jobs going, I think we know that a little
borrowing today might create jobs tomorrow. But now we are doing
massive borrowing to rebuild Iraq, while others tell us they cannot
afford to send troops and they cannot afford to spend money. I am
saying we are beginning to not be able to afford this war in Iraq.
So I hope we can work on some solutions to have Iraq emerge as a
democracy and bring our troops back home. We have to concentrate on how
we can have our national honor abroad but restore our national
Treasury.
I look forward to working on a bipartisan basis with my colleagues.
We have to get down to business and get strategy on how we are getting
out of Iraq, and also how we are getting out of debt.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from Oregon is recognized for
10 minutes.
____________________