[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 143 (Tuesday, October 14, 2003)]
[Senate]
[Pages S12493-S12508]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
GENETIC INFORMATION NONDISCRIMINATION ACT OF 2003
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the hour of 2:15
p.m. having arrived, the Senate will resume
[[Page S12494]]
consideration of S. 1053, which the clerk will report.
The assistant legislative clerk read as follows:
A bill (S. 1053) to prevent discrimination on the basis of
genetic information with respect to health insurance and
employment.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, there will be 15
minutes of debate equally divided, followed by a vote on passage of the
bill. Who yields time?
The Senator from New Hampshire.
Mr. GREGG. Mr. President, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
This is important legislation. It has been 6 years in gestation. It
is legislation which is not only important to our research community
but, more importantly, it is a major piece of civil rights legislation
in that it protects people in their employment and in getting health
care.
Essentially, we are in a new world in the community of health care
where you will actually be able to go to your doctor someday not too
long from now, and probably in some instances even today, and he will
be able to tell you some of the most severe illnesses projected for
your lifetime. That is called genetic information. It is great medical
news that we have moved this far, and there is a lot that will occur
that is positive as a result.
The other side of the coin is this information could be used
arbitrarily, unsuspectingly, or even intentionally to harm your
employment or your capacity to get health insurance. This legislation
corrects that concern. It makes it possible to continue genetics
research without people having to be concerned about the way their
personal genetics information may be used. That is why it is important.
A lot of folks have worked very hard on this bill. Senator Kennedy
has worked tirelessly to pass it. Senator Daschle has worked
aggressively to pass it. Senator Jeffords, when he was chairman of the
committee, worked very hard.
On our side of the aisle, Senator Enzi has made a major contribution
in the area of employment, and Senator Snowe was one of the originators
of the initiative.
At this point, I reserve the remainder of my time and yield the
floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Massachusetts.
Mr. KENNEDY. Mr. President, I see one of the primary sponsors, the
Senator from Maine. I will withhold and make comments when she
finishes.
Mr. GREGG. I yield 3 minutes to the Senator from Maine.
Ms. SNOWE. I thank the Senator from New Hampshire, chairman of the
committee, whose guidance throughout this process ultimately culminated
in this most significant piece of legislation. I express my
appreciation to him and to the Senate majority leader, without whose
leadership this legislation would not be possible, and to the
Democratic leader as well, and to Senator Kennedy, Senator Enzi, and,
of course, Senator Jeffords, who sponsored this effort with me some 7
to 8 years ago. I also acknowledge the presence of Representative
Slaughter from New York who has led the effort in the House for
approximately 8 years at this point.
This is the culmination of bipartisan efforts over the last 8 years
and over the last 2 years of bipartisan negotiations where we were able
to merge the differences between the legislation that I introduced and
that was introduced by Senators Daschle and Kennedy.
The fact is, since April of 1996, when I first introduced the Genetic
Nondiscrimination Health Insurance Act, science has continued to hurdle
forward, further opening the door to early detection and medical
intervention through the discovery and identification of specific genes
linked to diseases such as breast cancer, colon cancer, cystic
fibrosis, and Huntington's disease. That 1996 legislation recognized
that with the progress in the field of genetics accelerating at a
breathtaking pace, we needed to ensure that with the scientific
advances to come, we would advance the treatment and prevention of
disease without advancing a new basis for discrimination.
Certainly everything changed with the unveiling of the first working
draft of our entire genetic code. It became all the more imperative
that we respond with legislation that would at once allow the
tremendous promise of this breakthrough while at the same time protect
the American people from the dark side of discrimination.
Because there has been so many other scientific advancements this
carried with it, not only the prospect of scientific and medical
discoveries, such as improved detection and earlier intervention, but
also the potential for harm and abuse, every day since--absent
enactment of this type of legislation--has been a day we have left the
full potential of the human genome untapped.
This is no solution in search of a problem. To the contrary, the very
real fear of repercussions from one's genetic makeup was specifically
brought home to me through the real-life experience of one of my
constituents, Bonnie Lee Tucker. Bonnie wrote to me about the fear of
having the BRCA test for breast cancer. She was in a family who had
nine members with breast cancer. She herself is a survivor. She feared
having the BRCA test because she worried it would ruin her daughter's
ability to obtain health insurance in the future.
I ask that everybody support this legislation because, clearly, this
is one of the most significant groundbreaking pieces of legislation we
could have in the area of medical health care.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Massachusetts is recognized.
Mr. KENNEDY. I yield myself 2\1/2\ minutes.
First, I thank my colleague and friend, the chairman of the
committee, Senator Gregg, for prioritizing this issue. It is a matter
of enormous importance. I thank him and I thank Senator Snowe, who has
been a leader on this issue for a number of years. This has truly been
a bipartisan effort. I also thank our majority leader, Senator Frist,
also a doctor, who understands this issue and has been very
cooperative; Senator Enzi, who chairs a subcommittee in this area of
policy, has helped to advance this program. We are grateful for the
strong bipartisanship. I wish to recognize Congresswoman Slaughter, who
initiated the original legislation, and today we pay tribute to her.
Also, I thank our Democratic leader, Tom Daschle, who, in 1997, was
the first person to introduce the comprehensive genetic discrimination
program. Our friend, Senator Jeffords, has been an advocate for the
elimination of genetic discrimination; Tom Harkin and Chris Dodd have
been tireless advocates to make sure we got to this particular day.
I am going to yield time to Senator Harkin in a minute.
In 1964, this Nation passed the important civil rights legislation to
ban discrimination in our society in employment and public
accommodations, among other things. Then in 1965 we banned
discrimination in voting. Then, in 1968, we passed legislation to ban
discrimination in housing. Then, under the leadership of my friend from
Iowa, in 1990, the Americans with Disabilities Act passed to ban
discrimination on the basis of disability. We have also done much to
eliminate discrimination on ethnicity, on national origin, and we have
made enormous progress in discrimination on gender. We still have not
made enough progress on discrimination regarding gay and lesbian
issues. Today, we are continuing the march toward equality in the
United States, understanding the importance of eliminating
discrimination based upon an individual's genetic makeup, in terms of
insurance and in terms of employment. We are doing it in a way that is
going to guarantee real remedies. This is not just legislation that
will be out there and say we are against this form of discrimination;
we are providing real remedies. From now on, individuals will know that
no matter what their genetic makeup or susceptibility to genetic
disease, they may not be discriminated against in the job place or in
the provision of health insurance.
This is a major continuing step toward greater equality and the
elimination of bigotry and discrimination in our society. It is an
important day in the Senate. I commend all of those and the staff for
all they have done so well to make it possible.
I yield 3\1/2\ minutes to the Senator from Iowa.
Mr. HARKIN. Mr. President, I thank the Senator from Massachusetts for
the time. I join with him and others in thanking our leaders for
bringing this
[[Page S12495]]
bill forward. I congratulate Senator Gregg, chairman of our committee,
Senator Kennedy, ranking member on our side, Senator Snowe, and all the
other Senators they have mentioned, who have worked so hard to get us
to this point. Again, I thank the leadership for the vote today.
I was present sort of at the gestation period and finally the birth
of the mapping and sequencing of the human genome. What a magnificent
step forward this was in terms of our understanding of the underlying
basis for many of our diseases and illnesses. This feat of sequencing
and mapping of the 3.1 billion base pairs of the human genome,
sometimes called ``the book of life,'' opens up a world of
possibilities for preventing and curing disease. New genetic tests take
the concept of early detection and treatment of disease to levels that
were previously only imagined but are now scientifically possible.
Discoveries have been made about the genetic basis of many diseases,
such as heart disease, diabetes, Parkinson's disease, and asthma. Tests
are already available for breast cancer, ovarian cancer, colon cancer,
and several other diseases.
But while the potential medical and health benefits of this new
technology seem limitless, they cannot be pursued without caution and
safeguards against abuse, such as discrimination by health insurers or
employers. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, before us
now, addresses these possible abuses. It establishes protections
against discrimination based upon genetic information both in health
insurance and employment. It is a gigantic step forward, as Senator
Kennedy said, in making sure people are not discriminated against
simply because of what their genes are.
While this bill doesn't include everything I believe it should have
included, it is a significant step forward for the American people and
for our health care system. Under this bill, individuals will finally
be protected from discrimination by health insurers or employers based
on genetic makeup. Everybody will have the peace of mind to seek
answers to questions about themselves without fear of losing their
health insurance or their job.
I commend those leaders who have brought this forward and yield back
whatever time I may have remaining.
Mr. ENZI. Mr. President, 50 years ago James Watson and Francis Crick
discovered the structure of the DNA molecule--the blueprint of life.
Their discovery laid the foundation for predicting and treating the
hereditary diseases that threaten us.
The completion of the Human Genome Project in April 2003 was a
significant step towards this goal. Because of the work of these
scientists, we now are able to decipher the exact sequence of the
genetic code. This knowledge will allow earlier detection and more
effective treatment of genetic illnesses.
However, genetic information brings challenges along with promise.
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act will ensure that the
promise of genetic information is not hindered by fears about its
misuse. This legislation will protect individuals from discrimination
in health insurance and employment on the basis of genetic information.
I thank my colleagues on both sides of the aisle for crafting a bill
that fairly and effectively protects people against genetic
discrimination. In doing so, we have been mindful of existing
discrimination and privacy laws and regulations. While the issue is
complex, our objective is clear: to encourage people to seek genetic
services by reducing fears about the misuse or unwarranted disclosure
of genetic information.
Today, we mark the 50th anniversary of Watson and Crick's historic
discovery with the passage of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination
Act. With each new advance in genetic science, the significance of this
legislation grows. By allaying fears about genetic discrimination in
health insurance and in the workplace, this legislation will save lives
now and in generations yet to come.
(At the request of Mr. Daschle, the following statement was ordered
to be printed in the Record.)
Mr. KERRY. Mr. President, it is high time we have a strong
genetic information protection law on the books. The Senate bill I am
voicing support for today is a step in the right direction. However,
while I am pleased to join a bipartisan effort to pass S. 1053, the
Genetics Information Nondiscrimination Act, I hold out hope that the
enforcement provisions in the bill can be strengthened prior to final
passage. The House of Representatives will soon be conducting hearings
on the unanimously-passed Senate legislation and will be working to
craft their own version of the law. I sincerely hope that the House
works to strengthen--not weaken the bill. One area where the bill can
be strengthened is to give some real teeth to the enforcement
protections. If our goal of limiting discrimination based on genetic
information is to be realized, we must work to ensure that those whom
we seek to protect can truly use this law to guard against
discriminatory actions.
Mr. DODD. Mr. President, over the past decade, the science of
genetics has developed at an astonishing pace. The mapping of the human
genome is undoubtedly one of the greatest scientific achievements of my
lifetime. We have not even completely grasped the wide array of
potential benefits that may come from our newfound genetic knowledge.
Certainly, the impact on our health will be profound. Doctors will be
able to read our unique genetic blueprints and predict the likelihood
of developing diseases such as cancer, Alzheimer's, or Parkinson's.
They will also be able to use an individual's genetic information to
develop treatments for these same diseases and target individuals with
the treatment that will work best for them. This is not science
fiction--it is already beginning to happen.
For all the promise of the genetic age, there is also an inherent
threat. Science has outpaced the law and Americans are worried, and
rightly so, that their genetic information will be used, not to improve
their health, but to deny them health insurance or employment. There is
no information more personal and private than genetic information and
no information more worthy of special protection. Our genetic code is
the very blueprint of ourselves. It is with us from birth, and to some
extent it determines who we will become. What an incredibly powerful
tool, with its vast potential to help us live healthier lives. But the
nature of genetic information also makes it dangerous to the individual
if used incorrectly.
This is why so many of us, on both sides of the aisle, saw the need
several years ago for legally enforceable rules to maximize the
potential benefits of genetic information and minimize its potential
dangers. The legislation before use represents a culmination of the
efforts of many of us to establish such rules. It represents an
enormous step forward, and I wish to acknowledge the hard work of
everyone who was involved in crafting this legislation.
This bill provides significant new protections against the misuse of
genetic information. It ensures that Americans who are genetically
predisposed to health conditions will not lose or be denied health
insurance, jobs, or promotions based on their genetic makeup. Reaching
an agreement on this legislation means that our laws dealing with
genetic information can begin to catch up to the reality of our
technological capability in the field.
With these protections in place, individuals need not feel reluctant
to get the tests that may save or improve their lives. Although the
Americans with Disabilities Act, ADA, and the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act, HIPAA, took important steps towards
preventing genetic discrimination, this legislation is more
specifically tailored to prohibiting its misuse. Health plans and
health insurance issuers will not be allowed to underwrite, determine
premiums, or decide on eligibility for enrollment based on genetic
information. Employers will not be allowed to alter hiring practices
based on genetic information. The American public can feel secure in
the knowledge that their genetic blueprint will not be used to harm
them, that a genetic marker indicating a possible illness later in life
will not cause them to lose a job or health insurance.
This is by no means a perfect or complete bill. In particular, while
it poses some important limitations on the collection of personal
genetic information
[[Page S12496]]
by insurance companies, it would allow them to collect this
information, without consent, once an individual is enrolled in a
health plan. While insurers are expressly prohibited from using this
information for the purposes of underwriting, I am concerned that once
they have this information, it may be difficult to control how it is
used and who has access to it. We all know from experience that the
difficulty of protecting information increases exponentially with each
additional person who has access to that information.
Let me add that, during negotiations, good faith attempts were made
on both sides to address these concerns. Unfortunately, we could not
reach an agreement on this issue that made all parties comfortable. As
a result, the bill falls short of offering comprehensive privacy
protection. Personal genetic information is already widely available,
and the risk of abuse is high. Health plans and employers will have
legitimate reasons for collecting genetic information. But individuals
should be given the power to regulate how such information is
distributed, and with whom it is shared. As this bill becomes law, and
I sincerely hope it will, I will monitor closely how it is implemented,
and the extent to which privacy is protected. We may need to revisit
this issue in the future.
Despite this shortcoming, I support this bill, as it represents a
vast improvement over current law in many ways. I hope that it will
become law in the very near future. We all should feel free to make our
health care decisions based on our health care needs, not based on
fear. Today, we are close to making that goal a reality.
Mrs. CLINTON. Mr. President, S. 1053 has the laudatory goal of
prohibiting genetic discrimination. Genetic discrimination has many
victims, and their stories are wrenching. There are those who cannot
get coverage, as well those who lost job opportunities. But I want to
make sure we don't forget another category of victims--those who forego
important tests out of fear that they will be victimized. According to
a recent JAMA article, 57 percent of patients at risk for breast and
ovarian cancer declined a needed genetic test that could have guided
prevention and treatment interventions. That is why our goal should
have been jot just to pass a bill, but to pass a credible bill so that
people have enough confidence in our work to go our and get the health
services they need.
Unfortunately, I am concerned that the enforcement provisions of S.
1053, particularly in health insurance, are not strong enough to
accomplish the legislation's goal.
Our Nation has made significant investments in genetic research. This
research could one day lead to cures or preventions for diseases such
as cancer. This investment in genetic research will prove futile if the
result is not better health care. Individuals must participate in
genetic research if this Nation is to reap the rewards of our
investment and individuals must have confidence in the results of
genetic research in order to address their personal health issues.
However, as genetic information is increasingly revealed, great harm
can occur. As President Bush acknowledged in his June 23, 2001 radio
address:
This knowledge of the code of life has the potential to be
abused. Employers could be tempted to deny a job based on a
person's genetic profile. Insurance companies might use that
information to deny an application for coverage, or charge
excessive premiums.
Americans have already shown that they will not fully participate in
genetic research or take advantage of genetic technologies until they
believe that they are protected against genetic discrimination in
health insurance and employment. Without protection, patients fear
disclosing their family history, yet this hesitancy may impact the care
that they and their families receive.
As you recognize, genetic information is uniquely personal
information. It is fundamentally different from other medical
information. Because genetic information can be used against an
individual and an entire family, it enables a new form of
discrimination. It deserves strong enforcement and should not be
treated the same as other information in a medical record.
In order for S. 1053 to achieve its purpose, individuals must have
confidence in its enforceability. That confidence will be difficult to
instill without mechanisms such as access to a court or comparable
forum to seek redress for violations of the statute. In addition, it is
important that the public feel confident that violations are unlikely.
This reassurance can only come from legislating strong enforcement and
deterrence mechanisms. I would have liked to see the enforcement
mechanisms and remedies in S. 1053 strengthened to provide for
compensation for economic and non-economic damages and strong punitive
provisions. If there is no redress for individual harm and if nominal
fees are the only accountability mechanism in place, there is little to
deter health insurers and employers from using genetic information in
violation of the law.
However, I believe that this bill does make a start in the direction
of supporting the principle that advances in science should help move
civilization forward, not to reverse our progress. Discrimination based
on genetic information would be a step backward for civil rights and
human dignity. That is why I support action today to begin addressing
this issue, and hope that in the future we will reinforce today's
action with improvements to secure justice and civil rights for all
Americans.
Mr. JEFFORDS. Mr. President, today's consideration of S. 1053, the
Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, is the result of almost 6
years of effort, so I am especially pleased that we are here today to
consider and pass this bipartisan legislation. For the first time, S.
1053 will prohibit discrimination against individuals based on their
genetic make-up in both health insurance and employment. This
legislation represents a major contribution to civil rights law. It is
a victory for consumers, health insurers and health care providers; and
it is a victory for employees and employers.
The issue of genetic nondiscrimination has concerned me for many
years, and I have been pleased to work with many members of the Senate
to craft this legislation. The measure we are considering today is the
result of many years of effort and the contributions of many
individuals. It is an example of the progress that can be made when the
Senate seeks to negotiate and compromise on a bipartisan basis.
Together with the much deserved excitement over the potential of
genetic research there have also been long standing concerns that
genetic information, in the wrong hands, could be misused. Many people
have argued that an individual's genetic information--that might
indicate a predisposition to a particular disease--could be used to
deny that individual health insurance or employment opportunities. The
promise of better health would instead become a potential for greater
discrimination and disadvantage. The Genetic Information
Nondiscrimination Act of 2003 is designed to address those concerns.
Existing antidiscrimination law has been enacted over the years as a
means of correcting long-standing abuses in voter rights, employment,
housing and education. But under current law a person who has suffered
employment or health insurance discrimination because of their genetic
makeup has very little, if any, recourse to legal remedies. This
legislation addresses this problem by creating new enforceable rights
for individuals similar to those available under existing civil rights,
education and fair employment law.
It is important to note that to date, there has not been a pattern or
clear prevalence of genetic discrimination. But there is anecdotal
evidence that people have refused to take genetic tests because of
their fear that the predictive information would lead to
discrimination. We know the science is rapidly moving forward and we
are learning more every day about the ``predictive'' correlation
between genetic markers and certain diseases. It is not difficult to
imagine such discrimination occurring in the near future. So in a
sense, we can take that rare opportunity to be ahead of the curve and
enact legislation to preempt discriminatory practices and prevent them
from ever happening.
I believe the compromise legislation we consider today will be
successful in preventing abuses in the insuring of health services and
employment. However, we must remain vigilant against this type of
discrimination from ever
[[Page S12497]]
getting a foothold in our society and if this measure proves
insufficient and needs to be strengthened then we will be back and that
effort will have my support.
There are many Members who have played a significant role in bringing
together two different, though similar bills. My friend, Senator Snowe,
led one effort in which I was proud to join together with Senators
Frist, Enzi, Collins, and Hagel. In another effort, Senator Daschle was
joined by Senators Kennedy, Dodd, and Harkin. That measure focused
attention on the need for employment provisions and contributed to a
better understanding of the many critical and complex definitions.
Finally, I want to salute Senator Gregg, who as chairman of the HELP
Committee devoted his energies to finding a middle ground that has made
this legislation possible.
I am pleased at the willingness both sides have shown to work through
the many difficult aspects of this key issue. Through many meetings and
discussions we have been able to reach agreements on many important
issues, and improve the legislation. I look forward to continuing this
cooperative approach as we move to enact this important and landmark
initiative and I urge our colleagues in the House to pass it as well.
This legislation is supported by the President and it is my hope that
we can enact it into law before the end of this Congress. I urge all of
our colleagues to vote in its favor.
Mr. CORZINE. Mr. President, I am pleased that today the Senate is
considering legislation designed to prohibit discrimination in health
insurance and employment based on genetic information.
In the last decade, biomedical researchers have made great strides in
genetic research. While these discoveries are critical to researching
treatments and, ultimately, discovering cures for many diseases, this
information also has the potential to be used to deny health care
insurance or employment to an individual who has a genetic
predisposition to an illness. That is why we must make it illegal for
employers and health insurers to discriminate against individuals on
the basis of their genetic information.
S. 1053 is an important step, but it is only a first step. Any
legislation addressing this issue must include strong enforcement and
deterrence mechanisms. As this legislation moves forward, I hope its
enforcement provisions will be strengthened. Without strong
accountability provisions, there is little to deter employers and
health insurers from using genetic information inappropriately.
In addition, I hope that when this legislation is conferenced, the
conferees will find ways to strengthen the privacy provisions. It is
essential that our laws keep pace with technological advances and that
we continue to protect the privacy of our citizens. Advances in
technology cannot place fundamental American rights at risk.
Despite my concerns about the enforcement and privacy provisions, I
believe this legislation is a critical first step and look forward to
working with my colleagues to continue addressing the important issue
of genetic discrimination.
Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, today, the Senate came together to pass
S. 1053, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. I cast my vote
in favor of this bill because I think it takes an important first step
in the right direction. It is my view, however, that the bill does not
go far enough. I commend my colleagues for their efforts to craft a
bipartisan compromise, but I have serious concerns that the final bill
does not include adequate enforcement provisions.
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act prevents employers and
insurance companies from treating individuals differently because of
their genetic predispositions. It stops a health insurance company, for
example, from charging an individual a higher premium because her
mother had breast cancer.
S. 1053 does not, however, have adequate enforcement provisions.
There is no recourse for individuals who feel that their rights under
the law have been violated. There is no opportunity for a person to
hold his employer accountable for genetic discrimination in a court of
law. The current accountability provisions, which consist of nominal
fees, are not sufficient in order to protect individuals who have been
treated unfairly because of a genetic predisposition.
Therefore, I voted for this bill with some reluctance. I was very
pleased to see this issue addressed in the Senate, but concerned that
the language of the bill does not adequately protect the people for
whom it was written. I hope that there will be opportunities in the
future to strengthen this bill and ensure the rights of victims of
genetic discrimination.
Mr. DOMENICI. Mr. President, I rise today in support of the Genetic
Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2003, a bill that will prohibit
discrimination based on genetic information with respect to employment
and health insurance. This bill represents much cooperation on the part
of my colleagues, and I want to recognize Senators Snowe, Frist,
Jeffords, Daschle, Kennedy, and also HELP Committee Chairman Gregg, for
all the hard work done on this important issue.
I am extremely pleased with today's passage of the Genetic
Information Nondiscrimination Act, as it marks a great milestone for
those of us involved in the Human Genome Project. It seems only a short
time ago that the Human Genome Project was created as a joint effort
between the Department of Energy and the National Institutes of Health.
What progress we have made.
In the last two years, there have been many events celebrating the
completion of maps of the human genome. The genome map has brought a
promise of improved health through revolutionary new treatments for
illness and disease. The ultimate result of mapping the human genome is
a complete genetic blueprint, a blueprint containing the most personal
and most private information that any human being can have. We will now
have a wealth of knowledge of how our countless individual traits are
determined. And perhaps more important, we will have fundamental
knowledge about the genes that can cause sickness and sometimes even
death.
Our personal and unique genetic information is the essence of our
individuality. Our genetic blueprint is unique in each of us. However,
as genetic testing becomes a more frequently used tool, we now must
begin to address the ethical and legal issues regarding discrimination
on the basis of genetic information. Questions regarding privacy and
confidentiality, ownership and control, and consent for disclosure and
use of genetic information need to be carefully considered.
An unintended consequence of this new scientific revolution is the
abuses that have arisen as a result of our gathering genetic
information. Healthy people are being denied employment or health
insurance because of their genetic information. By addressing the issue
of nondiscrimination, we are affirming the right of an individual to
have a measure of control over his or her personal genetic information.
Genetic information only indicates a potential susceptibility to
future illness. In fact, many individuals identified as having a
hereditary condition are, indeed, healthy. Some people who test
positive for genetic mutations associated with certain conditions may
never develop those conditions at all. Genetic information does not
necessarily diagnose disease; yet, many people in our society have been
discriminated against because other people had access to information
about their genes, and made determinations based on this information
that the individual was too risky to insure or unsafe to employ.
While the issue is complex, our objective is clear; people should be
encouraged to seek genetic services and they should not fear its
discriminatory use or disclosure. The Genetic Information
Nondiscrimination Act is an important first step towards protecting
access for all Americans to employment and health services regardless
of their genetic inheritance. There is simply no place in the health
insurance or employment sector for discrimination based solely upon
genetic information.
Mr. KENNEDY. How much time do I have?
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator has a minute and a half.
Mr. KENNEDY. I yield myself the remaining time.
I ask unanimous consent that a statement of the administration's
policy be printed in the Record.
[[Page S12498]]
There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in
the Record, as follows:
Statement of Administration Policy
The Administration is committed to enactment of legislation
to prohibit genetic discrimination in health insurance and
employment. The Administration supports S. 1053, which would
bar health insurers from denying coverage to a healthy
individual or charging the person higher premiums based
solely on a genetic predisposition to developing a disease in
the future. The bill also would prohibit employers from using
individuals' genetic information when making hiring, firing,
job placement, or promotion decisions.
The Administration wants to work with the Congress to
ensure that individuals can be certain that they are
protected against the improper use of genetic information.
Unwarranted use of genetic information, and the fear of
potential discrimination, threatens both society's ability to
use new genetic technologies to improve human health and the
ability to conduct the very research needed to understand,
treat, and prevent diseases. Enactment of Federal legislation
will help guarantee that the Nation fully realizes the
potential of ongoing advances in genetic sciences.
Mr. KENNEDY. Mr. President, it is important to know that President
Bush, in 1997, while the governor of Texas, signed a law prohibiting
genetic discrimination. He also went to the Nation in a radio address
on June 23, 2001 and supported the elements included in this law. We
have a very strong Statement of Administration Policy in support of
this program.
We thank the President for his strong support and we will work with
our Republicans friends to try to make sure this message goes to the
House of Representatives and that they respond in a similar way.
I hope we will have an overwhelming vote in the Senate today. It is
one of the most important bills we will consider this Congress.
I yield back my time.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from New Hampshire is recognized.
Mr. GREGG. Mr. President, I thank the Senator from Massachusetts for
his aggressive and effective leadership on this issue. I also thank the
Democratic leader, who played a major role in this, Senator Harkin, who
has been working on this issue for many years, and, of course, Senator
Frist, also, because he has made this a priority and that is why we are
on the floor. This is an issue in which he obviously has a personal
interest, with his medical background.
We should also thank one of the groups that really energized this
initiative of making lives better through developing the human genome
and that is the folks at NIH, led by Dr. Francis Collins. They are the
ones who are going to take this knowledge and disseminate it in a way
that makes it available to the health community generally and, as a
result, improve the lives of literally millions of Americans and
potentially tens of millions of people around the world.
This is truly an extraordinary breakthrough in science, but it is
important that it be used right and it is important that it not be used
in a way that may harm individuals' economic well-being or their
capacity to get health insurance. That is why this legislation, at the
beginning, is so important. By having it in place, we will be able to
energize even more research and more use of the genetic information
that is available through science today.
Mr. President, I believe we are ready to vote. I yield back the
remainder of my time.
Mr. KENNEDY. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to proceed for 10
seconds.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator has time remaining.
Mr. KENNEDY. I also thank Judy Lichtman, who is president of the
Coalition for Genetic Fairness. I wanted to mention her name on the
floor. She did a great deal of work, as well as the coalition. We are
prepared to vote.
Mr. DASCHLE. Mr. President, a half-century ago, Drs. Francis Crick
and James Watson discovered the structure of DNA--a revolutionary
breakthrough that enabled scientists to begin unraveling the mysteries
of human life and diseases.
Earlier this year, scientists at the National Human Genome Research
Institute celebrated the completion of a massive undertaking begun 10
years earlier to map the entire human genetic code.
Our new knowledge about our genetic blueprint has the potential to
dramatically improve our health and the quality of our lives. It also
has the potential to destroy lives. Which of those two potentials
becomes reality depends on whether and how well our laws keep pace with
changes in technology.
We know from hearings we held in the Senate that current laws are
inadequate to protect Americans from genetic discrimination. We also
know that today Americans are not being tested, not taking advantage of
medical advances, and not participating in genetic research because of
their fear of discrimination. Their fears, unfortunately, are not
unfounded.
Almost 2 years ago, I met a man named Dave Escher. Mr. Escher had
worked for the same company for more than 25 years and was a good
employee. One day, Mr. Escher was told by his employer that he needed
to see a company doctor; if he refused, he was told he could lose his
job. So Dave Escher saw the doctor.
However, it wasn't until after the doctor's appointment--and only by
accident--that Mr. Escher learned that the company's doctors had used
his blood to conduct genetic tests for more than 20 medical conditions.
Stories like Mr. Escher's may be relatively rare today, but experts
tell us that is largely because genetic testing itself is still
relatively rare, and because many people are choosing not to take
genetic tests. As testing becomes more affordable and more common,
experts say, the incidence of discrimination is likely to increase
dramatically unless we act to prevent such discrimination.
Almost two centuries ago, Thomas Jefferson, one of this country's
foremost scientists and original thinkers, wrote that ``laws and
institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind.
As . . . new discoveries are made [and] new truths disclosed . . .
institutions must advance also, and keep pace with the times.''
In this age of genetic breakthroughs, it is essential that our laws
catch up with the science. We can't afford to take one step forward in
science but two steps backward in civil rights. Our laws must specify,
clearly and unambiguously, how genetic information may be used and how
it may not be used.
Today, after years of discussion and negotiation, the Senate is
finally poised to pass bipartisan legislation to protect all Americans
against the misuse and abuse of genetic information.
Our bill does three things:
No. 1, it forbids health insurers from discriminating against
individuals--denying them coverage, for instance, based on genetic text
results.
No. 2, it forbids employers from using genetic information to
discriminate in hiring, or in the terms and conditions of employment.
No. 3, it sets privacy standards for access and disclosure of genetic
information.
Genetic information should be a private matter--period. It should not
be shared with employers or insurance companies without an individual's
consent.
For years, experts have urged Congress to pass comprehensive national
standards to protect all Americans from genetic discrimination. If we
fail to do so, the experts warn, we will almost certainly squander many
of the enormous potential benefits of the genetic revolution.
We have been trying to heed that warning for years. I first
introduced legislation prohibiting genetic discrimination 6 years ago.
Senator Snowe and many other Senators on both sides of the aisle have
been working on this important issue for just as long. After countless
hours of tough negotiations, we have finally arrived at a fair
resolution that provides important protections for individuals in both
employment and health insurance.
Passage of this bill represents a victory for bipartisanship. But
more importantly, it is a victory for the American people.
Discrimination based on genetic information is just as arbitrary, just
as unacceptable, and just as un-American as discrimination based on
gender, race, religion, or disability. Like those other forms of
discrimination, it should not be allowed in this country.
Again, I thank our colleagues who have enabled us to reach this
compromise and I urge all of our colleagues to support it.
[[Page S12499]]
There are a few people who deserve special recognition. I
particularly want to thank those Senators who have been working on this
issue from the beginning and whose contributions were invaluable in
reaching this compromise, especially Senators Snowe, Kennedy, Harkin,
Dodd, Jeffords, Frist, Gregg, and Enzi.
I also want to thank Dr. Francis Collins and the staff at NIH, as
well as Kathy Hudson, who heads up the Genetics and Public Policy
Center at Johns Hopkins University. Without their technical expertise
and their determinations to help our laws keep pace with science, we
would not be here today.
One other person who must be recognized is our good friend in the
other body, Congresswoman Louise Slaughter. Her determined leadership
helped move us forward at every step of the way, and her tenacity and
expertise will be essential to passage of this legislation in the
House.
Nearly 2\1/2\ years ago, in one of his weekly radio addresses,
President Bush joined in the call for comprehensive protection of
genetic information. I urge all of our colleagues in the Senate to
support this well-crafted, bipartisan solution. I also hope that our
friends in the House will heed the President's words, follow this
Senate's actions, and pass this bill quickly so we can get it to the
President for his signature this year.
We cannot allow the gap between science and the law to continue to
widen. We all have genetic markers. We are all potentially at risk of
genetic discrimination. This is not a partisan issue. This is an urgent
civil rights issue. There is no reason to wait any longer. We have a
solution. We ought to pass it this year.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The majority leader.
Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, we are about to vote on legislation that
will provide important new protections against employment and health
insurance discrimination based on genetic profiling. The bill protects
Americans from both disease and discrimination.
We have been working on this legislation for many years, and I am
pleased today that the Senate is about to act. I expect that today the
Senate will overwhelmingly pass the genetic information
nondiscrimination bill.
I especially, commend my colleagues Senators Snowe, Gregg, Jeffords,
Daschle, Kennedy, Enzi, Hagel, Collins and DeWine for their hard work
and dedication over many years.
Since we began looking at the issue of genetic discrimination,
genetic scholarship has advanced by leaps and bounds. This year,
scientists, working in collaboration with the National Human Genome
Research Institute at the National Institutes of Health, published a
final draft of the sequence of the entire human genetic code.
It's a dazzling accomplishment that makes possible unprecedented
understanding of human development, health and disease. It has the
potential to change the way we practice medicine.
Scientists will be able to design drugs to treat specific genes.
Tissues and organs may be specifically engineered for use in
transplantation. Preventive care may potentially be based in large part
on genetic testing. But this new knowledge is also fraught with risk.
When I first joined Senator Snowe to address the issue of genetic
discrimination, almost one-third of women offered a test for breast
cancer risk at the National Institutes of Health declined, citing
concerns that health insurance companies would discriminate against
them.
They were afraid that genetic information gathered to protect them
from disease might end up hurting their chances to get insurance.
Their fears were understandable. Genetic screening is a powerful
tool, and can impart highly sensitive and very personal information.
The fear of genetic discrimination has the potential to prevent
individuals from participating in research studies, from taking
advantage of new genetic technologies, or even from discovering that
they are not at high risk for genetically related illnesses.
As a doctor and a Senator, I believe protecting our fellow citizens
from genetic discrimination is a moral and practical responsibility.
In the past, Congress has taken on the battle against discrimination,
most notably through the landmark 1964 Civil Rights Act, the 1990
Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Health Insurance Portability
and Accountability Act.
This legislation stands squarely on our time-tested civil rights
laws, establishing comprehensive, consistent, and fair protections.
Genetic research will make thrilling advances possible in the not too
distant future, including possible cures to our most vexing illnesses.
But as we greet the future with new technology and scientific
discoveries, we must take care to protect our body politic from
unintended and unanticipated consequences. I am pleased by the progress
we have made thus far, and I congratulate each of my colleagues on
their dedication to this issue.
I strongly support the passage of this bill. It will help protect
Americans from both discrimination and disease.
Mr. President, this is a bill we have worked on for the last 7 years.
It has allowed us to address an issue, the human genome and the
definition of the code, in advance. Everything we thought back then I
believe was right on target. It has taken a long time to get to where
we are today. It has taken a lot of bipartisan work among Senators on
both sides of the aisle who really came down to wanting to pass a bill
that did two things; that is, protect the health and the future health
of individuals in this country and, at the same time, protect from
discrimination. This bill accomplishes that.
Again, I congratulate my colleagues for their leadership and
persistence in passing this bill.
Mr. GREGG. Mr. President, I ask for the yeas and nays.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There is a sufficient second.
Under the previous order, the bill having been read the third time,
the question is, Shall the bill, as amended, pass? The clerk will call
the roll.
The assistant legislative clerk called the roll.
Mr. REID. I announce that the Senator from Minnesota (Mr. Dayton),
the Senator from North Carolina (Mr. Edwards), the Senator from
Massachusetts (Mr. Kerry), the Senator from Connecticut (Mr.
Lieberman), and the Senator from Georgia (Mr. Miller) are necessarily
absent.
I further announce that, if present and voting, the Senator from
Massachusetts (Mr. Kerry) would vote ``Yea''.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Crapo). Are there any other Senators in
the Chamber desiring to vote?
The result was announced--yeas 95, nays 0, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 377 Leg.]
YEAS--95
Akaka
Alexander
Allard
Allen
Baucus
Bayh
Bennett
Biden
Bingaman
Bond
Boxer
Breaux
Brownback
Bunning
Burns
Byrd
Campbell
Cantwell
Carper
Chafee
Chambliss
Clinton
Cochran
Coleman
Collins
Conrad
Cornyn
Corzine
Craig
Crapo
Daschle
DeWine
Dodd
Dole
Domenici
Dorgan
Durbin
Ensign
Enzi
Feingold
Feinstein
Fitzgerald
Frist
Graham (FL)
Graham (SC)
Grassley
Gregg
Hagel
Harkin
Hatch
Hollings
Hutchison
Inhofe
Inouye
Jeffords
Johnson
Kennedy
Kohl
Kyl
Landrieu
Lautenberg
Leahy
Levin
Lincoln
Lott
Lugar
McCain
McConnell
Mikulski
Murkowski
Murray
Nelson (FL)
Nelson (NE)
Nickles
Pryor
Reed
Reid
Roberts
Rockefeller
Santorum
Sarbanes
Schumer
Sessions
Shelby
Smith
Snowe
Specter
Stabenow
Stevens
Sununu
Talent
Thomas
Voinovich
Warner
Wyden
NOT VOTING--5
Dayton
Edwards
Kerry
Lieberman
Miller
The bill (S. 1053), as amended, was passed, as follows:
S. 1053
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.
(a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Genetic
Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2003''.
(b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents of this Act
is as follows:
Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Findings.
[[Page S12500]]
TITLE I--GENETIC NONDISCRIMINATION IN HEALTH INSURANCE
Sec. 101. Amendments to Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974.
Sec. 102. Amendments to the Public Health Service Act.
Sec. 103. Amendments to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Sec. 104. Amendments to title XVIII of the Social Security Act relating
to medigap.
Sec. 105. Privacy and confidentiality.
Sec. 106. Assuring coordination.
Sec. 107. Regulations; effective date.
TITLE II--PROHIBITING EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF GENETIC
INFORMATION
Sec. 201. Definitions.
Sec. 202. Employer practices.
Sec. 203. Employment agency practices.
Sec. 204. Labor organization practices.
Sec. 205. Training programs.
Sec. 206. Confidentiality of genetic information.
Sec. 207. Remedies and enforcement.
Sec. 208. Disparate impact.
Sec. 209. Construction.
Sec. 210. Medical information that is not genetic information.
Sec. 211. Regulations.
Sec. 212. Authorization of appropriations.
Sec. 213. Effective date.
TITLE III--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISION
Sec. 301. Severability.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Deciphering the sequence of the human genome and other
advances in genetics open major new opportunities for medical
progress. New knowledge about the genetic basis of illness
will allow for earlier detection of illnesses, often before
symptoms have begun. Genetic testing can allow individuals to
take steps to reduce the likelihood that they will contract a
particular disorder. New knowledge about genetics may allow
for the development of better therapies that are more
effective against disease or have fewer side effects than
current treatments. These advances give rise to the potential
misuse of genetic information to discriminate in health
insurance and employment.
(2) The early science of genetics became the basis of State
laws that provided for the sterilization of persons having
presumed genetic ``defects'' such as mental retardation,
mental disease, epilepsy, blindness, and hearing loss, among
other conditions. The first sterilization law was enacted in
the State of Indiana in 1907. By 1981, a majority of States
adopted sterilization laws to ``correct'' apparent genetic
traits or tendencies. Many of these State laws have since
been repealed, and many have been modified to include
essential constitutional requirements of due process and
equal protection. However, the current explosion in the
science of genetics, and the history of sterilization laws by
the States based on early genetic science, compels
Congressional action in this area.
(3) Although genes are facially neutral markers, many
genetic conditions and disorders are associated with
particular racial and ethnic groups and gender. Because some
genetic traits are most prevalent in particular groups,
members of a particular group may be stigmatized or
discriminated against as a result of that genetic
information. This form of discrimination was evident in the
1970s, which saw the advent of programs to screen and
identify carriers of sickle cell anemia, a disease which
afflicts African-Americans. Once again, State legislatures
began to enact discriminatory laws in the area, and in the
early 1970s began mandating genetic screening of all African
Americans for sickle cell anemia, leading to discrimination
and unnecessary fear. To alleviate some of this stigma,
Congress in 1972 passed the National Sickle Cell Anemia
Control Act, which withholds Federal funding from States
unless sickle cell testing is voluntary.
(4) Congress has been informed of examples of genetic
discrimination in the workplace. These include the use of
pre-employment genetic screening at Lawrence Berkeley
Laboratory, which led to a court decision in favor of the
employees in that case Norman-Bloodsaw v. Lawrence Berkeley
Laboratory (135 F.3d 1260, 1269 (9th Cir. 1998)). Congress
clearly has a compelling public interest in relieving the
fear of discrimination and in prohibiting its actual practice
in employment and health insurance.
(5) Federal law addressing genetic discrimination in health
insurance and employment is incomplete in both the scope and
depth of its protections. Moreover, while many States have
enacted some type of genetic non-discrimination law, these
laws vary widely with respect to their approach, application,
and level of protection. Congress has collected substantial
evidence that the American public and the medical community
find the existing patchwork of State and Federal laws to be
confusing and inadequate to protect them from discrimination.
Therefore Federal legislation establishing a national and
uniform basic standard is necessary to fully protect the
public from discrimination and allay their concerns about the
potential for discrimination, thereby allowing individuals to
take advantage of genetic testing, technologies, research,
and new therapies.
TITLE I--GENETIC NONDISCRIMINATION IN HEALTH INSURANCE
SEC. 101. AMENDMENTS TO EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY
ACT OF 1974.
(a) Prohibition of Health Discrimination on the Basis of
Genetic Information or Genetic Services.--
(1) No enrollment restriction for genetic services.--
Section 702(a)(1)(F) of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1182(a)(1)(F)) is amended by
inserting before the period the following: ``(including
information about a request for or receipt of genetic
services by an individual or family member of such
individual)''.
(2) No discrimination in group premiums based on genetic
information.--Section 702(b) of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1182(b)) is amended--
(A) in paragraph (2)(A), by inserting before the semicolon
the following: ``except as provided in paragraph (3)''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following:
``(3) No discrimination in group premiums based on genetic
information.--For purposes of this section, a group health
plan, or a health insurance issuer offering group health
insurance coverage in connection with a group health plan,
shall not adjust premium or contribution amounts for a group
on the basis of genetic information concerning an individual
in the group or a family member of the individual (including
information about a request for or receipt of genetic
services by an individual or family member of such
individual).''.
(b) Limitations on Genetic Testing.--Section 702 of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C.
1182) is amended by adding at the end the following:
``(c) Genetic Testing.--
``(1) Limitation on requesting or requiring genetic
testing.--A group health plan, or a health insurance issuer
offering health insurance coverage in connection with a group
health plan, shall not request or require an individual or a
family member of such individual to undergo a genetic test.
``(2) Rule of construction.--Nothing in this part shall be
construed to--
``(A) limit the authority of a health care professional who
is providing health care services with respect to an
individual to request that such individual or a family member
of such individual undergo a genetic test;
``(B) limit the authority of a health care professional who
is employed by or affiliated with a group health plan or a
health insurance issuer and who is providing health care
services to an individual as part of a bona fide wellness
program to notify such individual of the availability of a
genetic test or to provide information to such individual
regarding such genetic test; or
``(C) authorize or permit a health care professional to
require that an individual undergo a genetic test.
``(d) Application to All Plans.--The provisions of
subsections (a)(1)(F), (b)(3), and (c) shall apply to group
health plans and health insurance issuers without regard to
section 732(a).''.
(c) Remedies and Enforcement.--Section 502 of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1132) is
amended by adding at the end the following:
``(n) Enforcement of Genetic Nondiscrimination
Requirements.--
``(1) Injunctive relief for irreparable harm.--With respect
to any violation of subsection (a)(1)(F), (b)(3), or (c) of
section 702, a participant or beneficiary may seek relief
under subsection 502(a)(1)(B) prior to the exhaustion of
available administrative remedies under section 503 if it is
demonstrated to the court, by a preponderance of the
evidence, that the exhaustion of such remedies would cause
irreparable harm to the health of the participant or
beneficiary. Any determinations that already have been made
under section 503 in such case, or that are made in such case
while an action under this paragraph is pending, shall be
given due consideration by the court in any action under this
subsection in such case.
``(2) Equitable relief for genetic nondiscrimination.--
``(A) Reinstatement of benefits where equitable relief has
been awarded.--The recovery of benefits by a participant or
beneficiary under a civil action under this section may
include an administrative penalty under subparagraph (B) and
the retroactive reinstatement of coverage under the plan
involved to the date on which the participant or beneficiary
was denied eligibility for coverage if--
``(i) the civil action was commenced under subsection
(a)(1)(B); and
``(ii) the denial of coverage on which such civil action
was based constitutes a violation of subsection (a)(1)(F),
(b)(3), or (c) of section 702.
``(B) Administrative penalty.--
``(i) In general.--An administrator who fails to comply
with the requirements of subsection (a)(1)(F), (b)(3), or (c)
of section 702 with respect to a participant or beneficiary
may, in an action commenced under subsection (a)(1)(B), be
personally liable in the discretion of the court, for a
penalty in the amount not more than $100 for each day in the
noncompliance period.
``(ii) Noncompliance period.--For purposes of clause (i),
the term `noncompliance period' means the period--
``(I) beginning on the date that a failure described in
clause (i) occurs; and
``(II) ending on the date that such failure is corrected.
[[Page S12501]]
``(iii) Payment to participant or beneficiary.--A penalty
collected under this subparagraph shall be paid to the
participant or beneficiary involved.
``(3) Secretarial enforcement authority.--
``(A) General rule.--The Secretary has the authority to
impose a penalty on any failure of a group health plan to
meet the requirements of subsection (a)(1)(F), (b)(3), or (c)
of section 702.
``(B) Amount.--
``(i) In general.--The amount of the penalty imposed by
subparagraph (A) shall be $100 for each day in the
noncompliance period with respect to each individual to whom
such failure relates.
``(ii) Noncompliance period.--For purposes of this
paragraph, the term `noncompliance period' means, with
respect to any failure, the period--
``(I) beginning on the date such failure first occurs; and
``(II) ending on the date such failure is corrected.
``(C) Minimum penalties where failure discovered.--
Notwithstanding clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (D):
``(i) In general.--In the case of 1 or more failures with
respect to an individual--
``(I) which are not corrected before the date on which the
plan receives a notice from the Secretary of such violation;
and
``(II) which occurred or continued during the period
involved;
the amount of penalty imposed by subparagraph (A) by reason
of such failures with respect to such individual shall not be
less than $2,500.
``(ii) Higher minimum penalty where violations are more
than de minimis.--To the extent violations for which any
person is liable under this paragraph for any year are more
than de minimis, clause (i) shall be applied by substituting
`$15,000' for `$2,500' with respect to such person.
``(D) Limitations.--
``(i) Penalty not to apply where failure not discovered
exercising reasonable diligence.--No penalty shall be imposed
by subparagraph (A) on any failure during any period for
which it is established to the satisfaction of the Secretary
that the person otherwise liable for such penalty did not
know, and exercising reasonable diligence would not have
known, that such failure existed.
``(ii) Penalty not to apply to failures corrected within
certain periods.--No penalty shall be imposed by subparagraph
(A) on any failure if--
``(I) such failure was due to reasonable cause and not to
willful neglect; and
``(II) such failure is corrected during the 30-day period
beginning on the first date the person otherwise liable for
such penalty knew, or exercising reasonable diligence would
have known, that such failure existed.
``(iii) Overall limitation for unintentional failures.--In
the case of failures which are due to reasonable cause and
not to willful neglect, the penalty imposed by subparagraph
(A) for failures shall not exceed the amount equal to the
lesser of--
``(I) 10 percent of the aggregate amount paid or incurred
by the employer (or predecessor employer) during the
preceding taxable year for group health plans; or
``(II) $500,000.
``(E) Waiver by secretary.--In the case of a failure which
is due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect, the
Secretary may waive part or all of the penalty imposed by
subparagraph (A) to the extent that the payment of such
penalty would be excessive relative to the failure
involved.''.
(d) Definitions.--Section 733(d) of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1191b(d)) is amended
by adding at the end the following:
``(5) Family member.--The term `family member' means with
respect to an individual--
``(A) the spouse of the individual;
``(B) a dependent child of the individual, including a
child who is born to or placed for adoption with the
individual; and
``(C) all other individuals related by blood to the
individual or the spouse or child described in subparagraph
(A) or (B).
``(6) Genetic information.--
``(A) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraph (B),
the term `genetic information' means information about--
``(i) an individual's genetic tests;
``(ii) the genetic tests of family members of the
individual; or
``(iii) the occurrence of a disease or disorder in family
members of the individual.
``(B) Exclusions.--The term `genetic information' shall not
include information about the sex or age of an individual.
``(7) Genetic test.--
``(A) In general.--The term `genetic test' means an
analysis of human DNA, RNA, chromosomes, proteins, or
metabolites, that detects genotypes, mutations, or
chromosomal changes.
``(B) Exceptions.--The term `genetic test' does not mean--
``(i) an analysis of proteins or metabolites that does not
detect genotypes, mutations, or chromosomal changes; or
``(ii) an analysis of proteins or metabolites that is
directly related to a manifested disease, disorder, or
pathological condition that could reasonably be detected by a
health care professional with appropriate training and
expertise in the field of medicine involved.
``(8) Genetic services.--The term `genetic services'
means--
``(A) a genetic test;
``(B) genetic counseling (such as obtaining, interpreting,
or assessing genetic information); or
``(C) genetic education.''.
(e) Regulations and Effective Date.--
(1) Regulations.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
enactment of this title, the Secretary of Labor shall issue
final regulations in an accessible format to carry out the
amendments made by this section.
(2) Effective date.--The amendments made by this section
shall apply with respect to group health plans for plan years
beginning after the date that is 18 months after the date of
enactment of this title.
SEC. 102. AMENDMENTS TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE ACT.
(a) Amendments Relating to the Group Market.--
(1) Prohibition of health discrimination on the basis of
genetic information or genetic services.--
(A) No enrollment restriction for genetic services.--
Section 2702(a)(1)(F) of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 300gg-1(a)(1)(F)) is amended by inserting before the
period the following: ``(including information about a
request for or receipt of genetic services by an individual
or family member of such individual)''.
(B) No discrimination in group premiums based on genetic
information.--Section 2702(b) of the Public Health Service
Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg-1(b)) is amended--
(i) in paragraph (2)(A), by inserting before the semicolon
the following: ``, except as provided in paragraph (3)''; and
(ii) by adding at the end the following:
``(3) No discrimination in group premiums based on genetic
information.--For purposes of this section, a group health
plan, or a health insurance issuer offering group health
insurance coverage in connection with a group health plan,
shall not adjust premium or contribution amounts for a group
on the basis of genetic information concerning an individual
in the group or a family member of the individual (including
information about a request for or receipt of genetic
services by an individual or family member of such
individual).''.
(2) Limitations on genetic testing.--Section 2702 of the
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg-1) is amended by
adding at the end the following:
``(c) Genetic Testing.--
``(1) Limitation on requesting or requiring genetic
testing.--A group health plan, or a health insurance issuer
offering health insurance coverage in connection with a group
health plan, shall not request or require an individual or a
family member of such individual to undergo a genetic test.
``(2) Rule of construction.--Nothing in this part shall be
construed to--
``(A) limit the authority of a health care professional who
is providing health care services with respect to an
individual to request that such individual or a family member
of such individual undergo a genetic test;
``(B) limit the authority of a health care professional who
is employed by or affiliated with a group health plan or a
health insurance issuer and who is providing health care
services to an individual as part of a bona fide wellness
program to notify such individual of the availability of a
genetic test or to provide information to such individual
regarding such genetic test; or
``(C) authorize or permit a health care professional to
require that an individual undergo a genetic test.
``(d) Application to All Plans.--The provisions of
subsections (a)(1)(F), (b)(3), and (c) shall apply to group
health plans and health insurance issuers without regard to
section 2721(a).''.
(3) Remedies and enforcement.--Section 2722(b) of the
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg-22)(b)) is amended
by adding at the end the following:
``(3) Enforcement authority relating to genetic
discrimination.--
``(A) General rule.--In the cases described in paragraph
(1), notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (2)(C), the
following provisions shall apply with respect to an action
under this subsection by the Secretary with respect to any
failure of a health insurance issuer in connection with a
group health plan, to meet the requirements of subsection
(a)(1)(F), (b)(3), or (c) of section 2702.
``(B) Amount.--
``(i) In general.--The amount of the penalty imposed under
this paragraph shall be $100 for each day in the
noncompliance period with respect to each individual to whom
such failure relates.
``(ii) Noncompliance period.--For purposes of this
paragraph, the term `noncompliance period' means, with
respect to any failure, the period--
``(I) beginning on the date such failure first occurs; and
``(II) ending on the date such failure is corrected.
``(C) Minimum penalties where failure discovered.--
Notwithstanding clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (D):
``(i) In general.--In the case of 1 or more failures with
respect to an individual--
``(I) which are not corrected before the date on which the
plan receives a notice from the Secretary of such violation;
and
``(II) which occurred or continued during the period
involved;
the amount of penalty imposed by subparagraph (A) by reason
of such failures with respect to such individual shall not be
less than $2,500.
[[Page S12502]]
``(ii) Higher minimum penalty where violations are more
than de minimis.--To the extent violations for which any
person is liable under this paragraph for any year are more
than de minimis, clause (i) shall be applied by substituting
`$15,000' for `$2,500' with respect to such person.
``(D) Limitations.--
``(i) Penalty not to apply where failure not discovered
exercising reasonable diligence.--No penalty shall be imposed
by subparagraph (A) on any failure during any period for
which it is established to the satisfaction of the Secretary
that the person otherwise liable for such penalty did not
know, and exercising reasonable diligence would not have
known, that such failure existed.
``(ii) Penalty not to apply to failures corrected within
certain periods.--No penalty shall be imposed by subparagraph
(A) on any failure if--
``(I) such failure was due to reasonable cause and not to
willful neglect; and
``(II) such failure is corrected during the 30-day period
beginning on the first date the person otherwise liable for
such penalty knew, or exercising reasonable diligence would
have known, that such failure existed.
``(iii) Overall limitation for unintentional failures.--In
the case of failures which are due to reasonable cause and
not to willful neglect, the penalty imposed by subparagraph
(A) for failures shall not exceed the amount equal to the
lesser of--
``(I) 10 percent of the aggregate amount paid or incurred
by the employer (or predecessor employer) during the
preceding taxable year for group health plans; or
``(II) $500,000.
``(E) Waiver by secretary.--In the case of a failure which
is due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect, the
Secretary may waive part or all of the penalty imposed by
subparagraph (A) to the extent that the payment of such
penalty would be excessive relative to the failure
involved.''.
(4) Definitions.--Section 2791(d) of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg-91(d)) is amended by adding at
the end the following:
``(15) Family member.--The term `family member' means with
respect to an individual--
``(A) the spouse of the individual;
``(B) a dependent child of the individual, including a
child who is born to or placed for adoption with the
individual; and
``(C) all other individuals related by blood to the
individual or the spouse or child described in subparagraph
(A) or (B).
``(16) Genetic information.--
``(A) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraph (B),
the term `genetic information' means information about--
``(i) an individual's genetic tests;
``(ii) the genetic tests of family members of the
individual; or
``(iii) the occurrence of a disease or disorder in family
members of the individual.
``(B) Exclusions.--The term `genetic information' shall not
include information about the sex or age of an individual.
``(17) Genetic test.--
``(A) In general.--The term `genetic test' means an
analysis of human DNA, RNA, chromosomes, proteins, or
metabolites, that detects genotypes, mutations, or
chromosomal changes.
``(B) Exceptions.--The term `genetic test' does not mean--
``(i) an analysis of proteins or metabolites that does not
detect genotypes, mutations, or chromosomal changes; or
``(ii) an analysis of proteins or metabolites that is
directly related to a manifested disease, disorder, or
pathological condition that could reasonably be detected by a
health care professional with appropriate training and
expertise in the field of medicine involved.
``(18) Genetic services.--The term `genetic services'
means--
``(A) a genetic test;
``(B) genetic counseling (such as obtaining, interpreting,
or assessing genetic information); or
``(C) genetic education.''.
(b) Amendment Relating to the Individual Market.--
(1) In general.--The first subpart 3 of part B of title
XXVII of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg-51 et
seq.) (relating to other requirements) is amended--
(A) by redesignating such subpart as subpart 2; and
(B) by adding at the end the following:
``SEC. 2753. PROHIBITION OF HEALTH DISCRIMINATION ON THE
BASIS OF GENETIC INFORMATION.
``(a) Prohibition on Genetic Information as a Condition of
Eligibility.--A health insurance issuer offering health
insurance coverage in the individual market may not establish
rules for the eligibility (including continued eligibility)
of any individual to enroll in individual health insurance
coverage based on genetic information (including information
about a request for or receipt of genetic services by an
individual or family member of such individual).
``(b) Prohibition on Genetic Information in Setting Premium
Rates.--A health insurance issuer offering health insurance
coverage in the individual market shall not adjust premium or
contribution amounts for an individual on the basis of
genetic information concerning the individual or a family
member of the individual (including information about a
request for or receipt of genetic services by an individual
or family member of such individual).
``(c) Genetic Testing.--
``(1) Limitation on requesting or requiring genetic
testing.--A health insurance issuer offering health insurance
coverage in the individual market shall not request or
require an individual or a family member of such individual
to undergo a genetic test.
``(2) Rule of construction.--Nothing in this part shall be
construed to--
``(A) limit the authority of a health care professional who
is providing health care services with respect to an
individual to request that such individual or a family member
of such individual undergo a genetic test;
``(B) limit the authority of a health care professional who
is employed by or affiliated with a health insurance issuer
and who is providing health care services to an individual as
part of a bona fide wellness program to notify such
individual of the availability of a genetic test or to
provide information to such individual regarding such genetic
test; or
``(C) authorize or permit a health care professional to
require that an individual undergo a genetic test.''.
(2) Remedies and Enforcement.--Section 2761(b) of the
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg-61)(b)) is amended
to read as follows:
``(b) Secretarial Enforcement Authority.--The Secretary
shall have the same authority in relation to enforcement of
the provisions of this part with respect to issuers of health
insurance coverage in the individual market in a State as the
Secretary has under section 2722(b)(2), and section
2722(b)(3) with respect to violations of genetic
nondiscrimination provisions, in relation to the enforcement
of the provisions of part A with respect to issuers of health
insurance coverage in the small group market in the State.''.
(c) Elimination of Option of Non-Federal Governmental Plans
To Be Excepted From Requirements Concerning Genetic
Information.--Section 2721(b)(2) of the Public Health Service
Act (42 U.S. C. 300gg-21(b)(2)) is amended--
(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``If the plan
sponsor'' and inserting ``Except as provided in subparagraph
(D), if the plan sponsor''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
``(D) Election not applicable to requirements concerning
genetic information.--The election described in subparagraph
(A) shall not be available with respect to the provisions of
subsections (a)(1)(F) and (c) of section 2702 and the
provisions of section 2702(b) to the extent that such
provisions apply to genetic information (or information about
a request for or the receipt of genetic services by an
individual or a family member of such individual).''.
(d) Regulations and Effective Date.--
(1) Regulations.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
enactment of this title, the Secretary of Labor and the
Secretary of Health and Human Services (as the case may be)
shall issue final regulations in an accessible format to
carry out the amendments made by this section.
(2) Effective date.--The amendments made by this section
shall apply--
(A) with respect to group health plans, and health
insurance coverage offered in connection with group health
plans, for plan years beginning after the date that is 18
months after the date of enactment of this title; and
(B) with respect to health insurance coverage offered,
sold, issued, renewed, in effect, or operated in the
individual market after the date that is 18 months after the
date of enactment of this title.
SEC. 103. AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986.
(a) Prohibition of Health Discrimination on the Basis of
Genetic Information or Genetic Services.--
(1) No enrollment restriction for genetic services.--
Section 9802(a)(1)(F) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is
amended by inserting before the period the following:
``(including information about a request for or receipt of
genetic services by an individual or family member of such
individual)''.
(2) No discrimination in group premiums based on genetic
information.--Section 9802(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 is amended--
(A) in paragraph (2)(A), by inserting before the semicolon
the following: ``, except as provided in paragraph (3)''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following:
``(3) No discrimination in group premiums based on genetic
information.--For purposes of this section, a group health
plan shall not adjust premium or contribution amounts for a
group on the basis of genetic information concerning an
individual in the group or a family member of the individual
(including information about a request for or receipt of
genetic services by an individual or family member of such
individual).''.
(b) Limitations on Genetic Testing.--Section 9802 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end
the following:
``(d) Genetic Testing and Genetic Services.--
``(1) Limitation on requesting or requiring genetic
testing.--A group health plan shall not request or require an
individual or a family member of such individual to undergo a
genetic test.
``(2) Rule of construction.--Nothing in this part shall be
construed to--
``(A) limit the authority of a health care professional who
is providing health care
[[Page S12503]]
services with respect to an individual to request that such
individual or a family member of such individual undergo a
genetic test;
``(B) limit the authority of a health care professional who
is employed by or affiliated with a group health plan and who
is providing health care services to an individual as part of
a bona fide wellness program to notify such individual of the
availability of a genetic test or to provide information to
such individual regarding such genetic test; or
``(C) authorize or permit a health care professional to
require that an individual undergo a genetic test.
``(e) Application to All Plans.--The provisions of
subsections (a)(1)(F), (b)(3), and (d) shall apply to group
health plans and health insurance issuers without regard to
section 9831(a)(2).''.
(c) Definitions.--Section 9832(d) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following:
``(6) Family member.--The term `family member' means with
respect to an individual--
``(A) the spouse of the individual;
``(B) a dependent child of the individual, including a
child who is born to or placed for adoption with the
individual; and
``(C) all other individuals related by blood to the
individual or the spouse or child described in subparagraph
(A) or (B).
``(7) Genetic services.--The term `genetic services'
means--
``(A) a genetic test;
``(B) genetic counseling (such as obtaining, interpreting,
or assessing genetic information); or
``(C) genetic education.
``(8) Genetic information.--
``(A) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraph (B),
the term `genetic information' means information about--
``(i) an individual's genetic tests;
``(ii) the genetic tests of family members of the
individual; or
``(iii) the occurrence of a disease or disorder in family
members of the individual.
``(B) Exclusions.--The term `genetic information' shall not
include information about the sex or age of an individual.
``(9) Genetic test.--
``(A) In general.--The term `genetic test' means an
analysis of human DNA, RNA, chromosomes, proteins, or
metabolites, that detects genotypes, mutations, or
chromosomal changes.
``(B) Exceptions.--The term `genetic test' does not mean--
``(i) an analysis of proteins or metabolites that does not
detect genotypes, mutations, or chromosomal changes; or
``(ii) an analysis of proteins or metabolites that is
directly related to a manifested disease, disorder, or
pathological condition that could reasonably be detected by a
health care professional with appropriate training and
expertise in the field of medicine involved.''.
(d) Regulations and Effective Date.--
(1) Regulations.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
enactment of this title, the Secretary of the Treasury shall
issue final regulations in an accessible format to carry out
the amendments made by this section.
(2) Effective date.--The amendments made by this section
shall apply with respect to group health plans for plan years
beginning after the date that is 18 months after the date of
enactment of this title.
SEC. 104. AMENDMENTS TO TITLE XVIII OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY
ACT RELATING TO MEDIGAP.
(a) Nondiscrimination.--
(1) In general.--Section 1882(s)(2) of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ss(s)(2)) is amended by adding at the end
the following:
``(E)(i) An issuer of a medicare supplemental policy shall
not deny or condition the issuance or effectiveness of the
policy, and shall not discriminate in the pricing of the
policy (including the adjustment of premium rates) of an
eligible individual on the basis of genetic information
concerning the individual (or information about a request
for, or the receipt of, genetic services by such individual
or family member of such individual).
``(ii) For purposes of clause (i), the terms `family
member', `genetic services', and `genetic information' shall
have the meanings given such terms in subsection (v).''.
(2) Effective date.--The amendment made by paragraph (1)
shall apply with respect to a policy for policy years
beginning after the date that is 18 months after the date of
enactment of this Act.
(b) Limitations on Genetic Testing.--
(1) In general.--Section 1882 of the Social Security Act
(42 U.S.C. 1395ss) is amended by adding at the end the
following:
``(v) Limitations on Genetic Testing.--
``(1) Genetic testing.--
``(A) Limitation on requesting or requiring genetic
testing.--An issuer of a medicare supplemental policy shall
not request or require an individual or a family member of
such individual to undergo a genetic test.
``(B) Rule of construction.--Nothing in this title shall be
construed to--
``(i) limit the authority of a health care professional who
is providing health care services with respect to an
individual to request that such individual or a family member
of such individual undergo a genetic test;
``(ii) limit the authority of a health care professional
who is employed by or affiliated with an issuer of a medicare
supplemental policy and who is providing health care services
to an individual as part of a bona fide wellness program to
notify such individual of the availability of a genetic test
or to provide information to such individual regarding such
genetic test; or
``(iii) authorize or permit a health care professional to
require that an individual undergo a genetic test.
``(2) Definitions.--In this subsection:
``(A) Family member.--The term `family member' means with
respect to an individual--
``(i) the spouse of the individual;
``(ii) a dependent child of the individual, including a
child who is born to or placed for adoption with the
individual; or
``(iii) any other individuals related by blood to the
individual or to the spouse or child described in clause (i)
or (ii).
``(B) Genetic information.--
``(i) In general.--Except as provided in clause (ii), the
term `genetic information' means information about--
``(I) an individual's genetic tests;
``(II) the genetic tests of family members of the
individual; or
``(III) the occurrence of a disease or disorder in family
members of the individual.
``(ii) Exclusions.--The term `genetic information' shall
not include information about the sex or age of an
individual.
``(C) Genetic test.--
``(i) In general.--The term `genetic test' means an
analysis of human DNA, RNA, chromosomes, proteins, or
metabolites, that detects genotypes, mutations, or
chromosomal changes.
``(ii) Exceptions.--The term `genetic test' does not mean--
``(I) an analysis of proteins or metabolites that does not
detect genotypes, mutations, or chromosomal changes; or
``(II) an analysis of proteins or metabolites that is
directly related to a manifested disease, disorder, or
pathological condition that could reasonably be detected by a
health care professional with appropriate training and
expertise in the field of medicine involved.
``(D) Genetic services.--The term `genetic services'
means--
``(i) a genetic test;
``(ii) genetic counseling (such as obtaining, interpreting,
or assessing genetic information); or
``(iii) genetic education.
``(E) Issuer of a medicare supplemental policy.--The term
`issuer of a medicare supplemental policy' includes a third-
party administrator or other person acting for or on behalf
of such issuer.''.
(2) Conforming amendment.--Section 1882(o) of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ss(o)) is amended by adding at
the end the following:
``(4) The issuer of the medicare supplemental policy
complies with subsection (s)(2)(E) and subsection (v).''.
(3) Effective date.--The amendments made by this subsection
shall apply with respect to an issuer of a medicare
supplemental policy for policy years beginning on or after
the date that is 18 months after the date of enactment of
this Act.
(c) Transition Provisions.--
(1) In general.--If the Secretary of Health and Human
Services identifies a State as requiring a change to its
statutes or regulations to conform its regulatory program to
the changes made by this section, the State regulatory
program shall not be considered to be out of compliance with
the requirements of section 1882 of the Social Security Act
due solely to failure to make such change until the date
specified in paragraph (4).
(2) NAIC standards.--If, not later than June 30, 2004, the
National Association of Insurance Commissioners (in this
subsection referred to as the ``NAIC'') modifies its NAIC
Model Regulation relating to section 1882 of the Social
Security Act (referred to in such section as the 1991 NAIC
Model Regulation, as subsequently modified) to conform to the
amendments made by this section, such revised regulation
incorporating the modifications shall be considered to be the
applicable NAIC model regulation (including the revised NAIC
model regulation and the 1991 NAIC Model Regulation) for the
purposes of such section.
(3) Secretary standards.--If the NAIC does not make the
modifications described in paragraph (2) within the period
specified in such paragraph, the Secretary of Health and
Human Services shall, not later than October 1, 2004, make
the modifications described in such paragraph and such
revised regulation incorporating the modifications shall be
considered to be the appropriate regulation for the purposes
of such section.
(4) Date specified.--
(A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), the date
specified in this paragraph for a State is the earlier of--
(i) the date the State changes its statutes or regulations
to conform its regulatory program to the changes made by this
section, or
(ii) October 1, 2004.
(B) Additional legislative action required.--In the case of
a State which the Secretary identifies as--
(i) requiring State legislation (other than legislation
appropriating funds) to conform its regulatory program to the
changes made in this section, but
(ii) having a legislature which is not scheduled to meet in
2004 in a legislative session in which such legislation may
be considered,
the date specified in this paragraph is the first day of the
first calendar quarter beginning after the close of the first
legislative session of the State legislature that begins
[[Page S12504]]
on or after July 1, 2004. For purposes of the previous
sentence, in the case of a State that has a 2-year
legislative session, each year of such session shall be
deemed to be a separate regular session of the State
legislature.
SEC. 105. PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY.
(a) Applicability.--Except as provided in subsection (d),
the provisions of this section shall apply to group health
plans, health insurance issuers (including issuers in
connection with group health plans or individual health
coverage), and issuers of medicare supplemental policies,
without regard to--
(1) section 732(a) of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1191a(a));
(2) section 2721(a) of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 300gg-21(a)); and
(3) section 9831(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986.
(b) Compliance with Certain Confidentiality Standards with
Respect to Genetic Information.--
(1) In general.--The regulations promulgated by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services under part C of title
XI of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320d et seq.) and
section 264 of the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996 (42 U.S.C. 1320d-2 note) shall
apply to the use or disclosure of genetic information.
(2) Prohibition on underwriting and premium rating.--
Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a group health plan, a health
insurance issuer, or issuer of a medicare supplemental policy
shall not use or disclose genetic information (including
information about a request for or a receipt of genetic
services by an individual or family member of such
individual) for purposes of underwriting, determinations of
eligibility to enroll, premium rating, or the creation,
renewal or replacement of a plan, contract or coverage for
health insurance or health benefits.
(c) Prohibition on Collection of Genetic Information.--
(1) In general.--A group health plan, health insurance
issuer, or issuer of a medicare supplemental policy shall not
request, require, or purchase genetic information (including
information about a request for or a receipt of genetic
services by an individual or family member of such
individual) for purposes of underwriting, determinations of
eligibility to enroll, premium rating, or the creation,
renewal or replacement of a plan, contract or coverage for
health insurance or health benefits.
(2) Limitation relating to the collection of genetic
information prior to enrollment.--A group health plan, health
insurance issuer, or issuer of a medicare supplemental policy
shall not request, require, or purchase genetic information
(including information about a request for or a receipt of
genetic services by an individual or family member of such
individual) concerning a participant, beneficiary, or
enrollee prior to the enrollment, and in connection with such
enrollment, of such individual under the plan, coverage, or
policy.
(3) Incidental collection.--Where a group health plan,
health insurance issuer, or issuer of a medicare supplemental
policy obtains genetic information incidental to the
requesting, requiring, or purchasing of other information
concerning a participant, beneficiary, or enrollee, such
request, requirement, or purchase shall not be considered a
violation of this subsection if--
(A) such request, requirement, or purchase is not in
violation of paragraph (1); and
(B) any genetic information (including information about a
request for or receipt of genetic services) requested,
required, or purchased is not used or disclosed in violation
of subsection (b).
(d) Application of Confidentiality Standards.--The
provisions of subsections (b) and (c) shall not apply--
(1) to group health plans, health insurance issuers, or
issuers of medicare supplemental policies that are not
otherwise covered under the regulations promulgated by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services under part C of title
XI of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320d et seq.) and
section 264 of the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996 (42 U.S.C. 1320d-2 note); and
(2) to genetic information that is not considered to be
individually-identifiable health information under the
regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Health and Human
Services under part C of title XI of the Social Security Act
(42 U.S.C. 1320d et seq.) and section 264 of the Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (42
U.S.C. 1320d-2 note).
(e) Enforcement.--A group health plan, health insurance
issuer, or issuer of a medicare supplemental policy that
violates a provision of this section shall be subject to the
penalties described in sections 1176 and 1177 of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320d-5 and 1320d-6) in the same
manner and to the same extent that such penalties apply to
violations of part C of title XI of such Act.
(f) Preemption.--
(1) In general.--A provision or requirement under this
section or a regulation promulgated under this section shall
supersede any contrary provision of State law unless such
provision of State law imposes requirements, standards, or
implementation specifications that are more stringent than
the requirements, standards, or implementation
specifications imposed under this section or such
regulations. No penalty, remedy, or cause of action to
enforce such a State law that is more stringent shall be
preempted by this section.
(2) Rule of construction.--Nothing in paragraph (1) shall
be construed to establish a penalty, remedy, or cause of
action under State law if such penalty, remedy, or cause of
action is not otherwise available under such State law.
(g) Coordination with Privacy Regulations.--The Secretary
shall implement and administer this section in a manner that
is consistent with the implementation and administration by
the Secretary of the regulations promulgated by the Secretary
of Health and Human Services under part C of title XI of the
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320d et seq.) and section 264
of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of
1996 (42 U.S.C. 1320d-2 note).
(h) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Genetic information; genetic services.--The terms
``family member'', ``genetic information'', ``genetic
services'', and ``genetic test'' have the meanings given such
terms in section 2791 of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 300gg-91), as amended by this Act.
(2) Group health plan; health insurance issuer.--The terms
``group health plan'' and ``health insurance issuer'' include
only those plans and issuers that are covered under the
regulations described in subsection (d)(1).
(3) Issuer of a medicare supplemental policy.--The term
``issuer of a medicare supplemental policy'' means an issuer
described in section 1882 of the Social Security Act (42
insert 1395ss).
(4) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary
of Health and Human Services.
SEC. 106. ASSURING COORDINATION.
(a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), the
Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Health and Human
Services, and the Secretary of Labor shall ensure, through
the execution of an interagency memorandum of understanding
among such Secretaries, that--
(1) regulations, rulings, and interpretations issued by
such Secretaries relating to the same matter over which two
or more such Secretaries have responsibility under this title
(and the amendments made by this title) are administered so
as to have the same effect at all times; and
(2) coordination of policies relating to enforcing the same
requirements through such Secretaries in order to have a
coordinated enforcement strategy that avoids duplication of
enforcement efforts and assigns priorities in enforcement.
(b) Authority of the Secretary.--The Secretary of Health
and Human Services has the sole authority to promulgate
regulations to implement section 105.
SEC. 107. REGULATIONS; EFFECTIVE DATE.
(a) Regulations.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
enactment of this title, the Secretary of Labor, the
Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the Secretary of
the Treasury shall issue final regulations in an accessible
format to carry out this title.
(b) Effective Date.--Except as provided in section 104, the
amendments made by this title shall take effect on the date
that is 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act.
TITLE II--PROHIBITING EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF GENETIC
INFORMATION
SEC. 201. DEFINITIONS.
In this title:
(1) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission as created by section 705
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e-4).
(2) Employee; employer; employment agency; labor
organization; member.--
(A) In general.--The term ``employee'' means--
(i) an employee (including an applicant), as defined in
section 701(f) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C.
2000e(f));
(ii) a State employee (including an applicant) described in
section 304(a) of the Government Employee Rights Act of 1991
(42 U.S.C. 2000e-16c(a));
(iii) a covered employee (including an applicant), as
defined in section 101 of the Congressional Accountability
Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1301);
(iv) a covered employee (including an applicant), as
defined in section 411(c) of title 3, United States Code; or
(v) an employee or applicant to which section 717(a) of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(a)) applies.
(B) Employer.--The term ``employer'' means--
(i) an employer (as defined in section 701(b) of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e(b));
(ii) an entity employing a State employee described in
section 304(a) of the Government Employee Rights Act of 1991;
(iii) an employing office, as defined in section 101 of the
Congressional Accountability Act of 1995;
(iv) an employing office, as defined in section 411(c) of
title 3, United States Code; or
(v) an entity to which section 717(a) of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 applies.
(C) Employment agency; labor organization.--The terms
``employment agency'' and ``labor organization'' have the
meanings given the terms in section 701 of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e).
(D) Member.--The term ``member'', with respect to a labor
organization, includes an applicant for membership in a labor
organization.
[[Page S12505]]
(3) Family member.--The term ``family member'' means with
respect to an individual--
(A) the spouse of the individual;
(B) a dependent child of the individual, including a child
who is born to or placed for adoption with the individual;
and
(C) all other individuals related by blood to the
individual or the spouse or child described in subparagraph
(A) or (B).
(4) Genetic information.--
(A) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraph (B),
the term ``genetic information'' means information about--
(i) an individual's genetic tests;
(ii) the genetic tests of family members of the individual;
or
(iii) the occurrence of a disease or disorder in family
members of the individual.
(B) Exceptions.--The term ``genetic information'' shall not
include information about the sex or age of an individual.
(5) Genetic monitoring.--The term ``genetic monitoring''
means the periodic examination of employees to evaluate
acquired modifications to their genetic material, such as
chromosomal damage or evidence of increased occurrence of
mutations, that may have developed in the course of
employment due to exposure to toxic substances in the
workplace, in order to identify, evaluate, and respond to the
effects of or control adverse environmental exposures in the
workplace.
(6) Genetic services.--The term ``genetic services''
means--
(A) a genetic test;
(B) genetic counseling (such as obtaining, interpreting or
assessing genetic information); or
(C) genetic education.
(7) Genetic test.--
(A) In general.--The term ``genetic test'' means the
analysis of human DNA, RNA, chromosomes, proteins, or
metabolites, that detects genotypes, mutations, or
chromosomal changes.
(B) Exception.--The term ``genetic test'' does not mean an
analysis of proteins or metabolites that does not detect
genotypes, mutations, or chromosomal changes.
SEC. 202. EMPLOYER PRACTICES.
(a) Use of Genetic Information.--It shall be an unlawful
employment practice for an employer--
(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any employee,
or otherwise to discriminate against any employee with
respect to the compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges
of employment of the employee, because of genetic information
with respect to the employee (or information about a request
for or the receipt of genetic services by such employee or
family member of such employee); or
(2) to limit, segregate, or classify the employees of the
employer in any way that would deprive or tend to deprive any
employee of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely
affect the status of the employee as an employee, because of
genetic information with respect to the employee (or
information about a request for or the receipt of genetic
services by such employee or family member of such employee).
(b) Acquisition of Genetic Information.--It shall be an
unlawful employment practice for an employer to request,
require, or purchase genetic information with respect to an
employee or a family member of the employee (or information
about a request for the receipt of genetic services by such
employee or a family member of such employee) except--
(1) where an employer inadvertently requests or requires
family medical history of the employee or family member of
the employee;
(2) where--
(A) health or genetic services are offered by the employer,
including such services offered as part of a bona fide
wellness program;
(B) the employee provides prior, knowing, voluntary, and
written authorization;
(C) only the employee (or family member if the family
member is receiving genetic services) and the licensed health
care professional or board certified genetic counselor
involved in providing such services receive individually
identifiable information concerning the results of such
services; and
(D) any individually identifiable genetic information
provided under subparagraph (C) in connection with the
services provided under subparagraph (A) is only available
for purposes of such services and shall not be disclosed to
the employer except in aggregate terms that do not disclose
the identity of specific employees;
(3) where an employer requests or requires family medical
history from the employee to comply with the certification
provisions of section 103 of the Family and Medical Leave Act
of 1993 (29 U.S.C. 2613) or such requirements under State
family and medical leave laws;
(4) where an employer purchases documents that are
commercially and publicly available (including newspapers,
magazines, periodicals, and books, but not including medical
databases or court records) that include family medical
history; or
(5) where the information involved is to be used for
genetic monitoring of the biological effects of toxic
substances in the workplace, but only if--
(A) the employer provides written notice of the genetic
monitoring to the employee;
(B)(i) the employee provides prior, knowing, voluntary, and
written authorization; or
(ii) the genetic monitoring is required by Federal or State
law;
(C) the employee is informed of individual monitoring
results;
(D) the monitoring is in compliance with--
(i) any Federal genetic monitoring regulations, including
any such regulations that may be promulgated by the Secretary
of Labor pursuant to the Occupational Safety and Health Act
of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.), the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), or the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.); or
(ii) State genetic monitoring regulations, in the case of a
State that is implementing genetic monitoring regulations
under the authority of the Occupational Safety and Health Act
of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.); and
(E) the employer, excluding any licensed health care
professional or board certified genetic counselor that is
involved in the genetic monitoring program, receives the
results of the monitoring only in aggregate terms that do not
disclose the identity of specific employees;
(c) Preservation of protections.--In the case of
information to which any of paragraphs (1) through (5) of
subsection (b) applies, such information may not be used in
violation of paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a) or
treated or disclosed in a manner that violates section 206.
SEC. 203. EMPLOYMENT AGENCY PRACTICES.
(a) Use of Genetic Information.--It shall be an unlawful
employment practice for an employment agency--
(1) to fail or refuse to refer for employment, or otherwise
to discriminate against, any individual because of genetic
information with respect to the individual (or information
about a request for or the receipt of genetic services by
such individual or family member of such individual);
(2) to limit, segregate, or classify individuals or fail or
refuse to refer for employment any individual in any way that
would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment
opportunities, or otherwise adversely affect the status of
the individual as an employee, because of genetic information
with respect to the individual (or information about a
request for or the receipt of genetic services by such
individual or family member of such individual); or
(3) to cause or attempt to cause an employer to
discriminate against an individual in violation of this
title.
(b) Acquisition of Genetic Information.--It shall be an
unlawful employment practice for an employment agency to
request, require, or purchase genetic information with
respect to an individual or a family member of the individual
(or information about a request for the receipt of genetic
services by such individual or a family member of such
individual) except--
(1) where an employment agency inadvertently requests or
requires family medical history of the individual or family
member of the individual;
(2) where--
(A) health or genetic services are offered by the
employment agency, including such services offered as part of
a bona fide wellness program;
(B) the individual provides prior, knowing, voluntary, and
written authorization;
(C) only the individual (or family member if the family
member is receiving genetic services) and the licensed health
care professional or board certified genetic counselor
involved in providing such services receive individually
identifiable information concerning the results of such
services; and
(D) any individually identifiable genetic information
provided under subparagraph (C) in connection with the
services provided under subparagraph (A) is only available
for purposes of such services and shall not be disclosed to
the employment agency except in aggregate terms that do not
disclose the identity of specific individuals;
(3) where an employment agency requests or requires family
medical history from the individual to comply with the
certification provisions of section 103 of the Family and
Medical Leave Act of 1993 (29 U.S.C. 2613) or such
requirements under State family and medical leave laws;
(4) where an employment agency purchases documents that are
commercially and publicly available (including newspapers,
magazines, periodicals, and books, but not including medical
databases or court records) that include family medical
history; or
(5) where the information involved is to be used for
genetic monitoring of the biological effects of toxic
substances in the workplace, but only if--
(A) the employment agency provides written notice of the
genetic monitoring to the individual;
(B)(i) the individual provides prior, knowing, voluntary,
and written authorization; or
(ii) the genetic monitoring is required by Federal or State
law;
(C) the individual is informed of individual monitoring
results;
(D) the monitoring is in compliance with--
(i) any Federal genetic monitoring regulations, including
any such regulations that may be promulgated by the Secretary
of Labor pursuant to the Occupational Safety and Health Act
of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.), the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), or the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.); or
(ii) State genetic monitoring regulations, in the case of a
State that is implementing genetic monitoring regulations
under the authority of the Occupational Safety and Health Act
of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.); and
[[Page S12506]]
(E) the employment agency, excluding any licensed health
care professional or board certified genetic counselor that
is involved in the genetic monitoring program, receives the
results of the monitoring only in aggregate terms that do not
disclose the identity of specific individuals;
(c) Preservation of protections.--In the case of
information to which any of paragraphs (1) through (5) of
subsection (b) applies, such information may not be used in
violation of paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a) or
treated or disclosed in a manner that violates section 206.
SEC. 204. LABOR ORGANIZATION PRACTICES.
(a) Use of Genetic Information.--It shall be an unlawful
employment practice for a labor organization--
(1) to exclude or to expel from the membership of the
organization, or otherwise to discriminate against, any
member because of genetic information with respect to the
member (or information about a request for or the receipt of
genetic services by such member or family member of such
member);
(2) to limit, segregate, or classify the members of the
organization, or fail or refuse to refer for employment any
member, in any way that would deprive or tend to deprive any
member of employment opportunities, or otherwise adversely
affect the status of the member as an employee, because of
genetic information with respect to the member (or
information about a request for or the receipt of genetic
services by such member or family member of such member); or
(3) to cause or attempt to cause an employer to
discriminate against a member in violation of this title.
(b) Acquisition of Genetic Information.--It shall be an
unlawful employment practice for a labor organization to
request, require, or purchase genetic information with
respect to a member or a family member of the member (or
information about a request for the receipt of genetic
services by such member or a family member of such member)
except--
(1) where a labor organization inadvertently requests or
requires family medical history of the member or family
member of the member;
(2) where--
(A) health or genetic services are offered by the labor
organization, including such services offered as part of a
bona fide wellness program;
(B) the member provides prior, knowing, voluntary, and
written authorization;
(C) only the member (or family member if the family member
is receiving genetic services) and the licensed health care
professional or board certified genetic counselor involved in
providing such services receive individually identifiable
information concerning the results of such services; and
(D) any individually identifiable genetic information
provided under subparagraph (C) in connection with the
services provided under subparagraph (A) is only available
for purposes of such services and shall not be disclosed to
the labor organization except in aggregate terms that do not
disclose the identity of specific members;
(3) where a labor organization requests or requires family
medical history from the members to comply with the
certification provisions of section 103 of the Family and
Medical Leave Act of 1993 (29 U.S.C. 2613) or such
requirements under State family and medical leave laws;
(4) where a labor organization purchases documents that are
commercially and publicly available (including newspapers,
magazines, periodicals, and books, but not including medical
databases or court records) that include family medical
history; or
(5) where the information involved is to be used for
genetic monitoring of the biological effects of toxic
substances in the workplace, but only if--
(A) the labor organization provides written notice of the
genetic monitoring to the member;
(B)(i) the member provides prior, knowing, voluntary, and
written authorization; or
(ii) the genetic monitoring is required by Federal or State
law;
(C) the member is informed of individual monitoring
results;
(D) the monitoring is in compliance with--
(i) any Federal genetic monitoring regulations, including
any such regulations that may be promulgated by the Secretary
of Labor pursuant to the Occupational Safety and Health Act
of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.), the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), or the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.); or
(ii) State genetic monitoring regulations, in the case of a
State that is implementing genetic monitoring regulations
under the authority of the Occupational Safety and Health Act
of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.); and
(E) the labor organization, excluding any licensed health
care professional or board certified genetic counselor that
is involved in the genetic monitoring program, receives the
results of the monitoring only in aggregate terms that do not
disclose the identity of specific members;
(c) Preservation of protections.--In the case of
information to which any of paragraphs (1) through (5) of
subsection (b) applies, such information may not be used in
violation of paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a) or
treated or disclosed in a manner that violates section 206.
SEC. 205. TRAINING PROGRAMS.
(a) Use of Genetic Information.--It shall be an unlawful
employment practice for any employer, labor organization, or
joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship
or other training or retraining, including on-the-job
training programs--
(1) to discriminate against any individual because of
genetic information with respect to the individual (or
information about a request for or the receipt of genetic
services by such individual or a family member of such
individual) in admission to, or employment in, any program
established to provide apprenticeship or other training or
retraining;
(2) to limit, segregate, or classify the applicants for or
participants in such apprenticeship or other training or
retraining, or fail or refuse to refer for employment any
individual, in any way that would deprive or tend to deprive
any individual of employment opportunities, or otherwise
adversely affect the status of the individual as an employee,
because of genetic information with respect to the individual
(or information about a request for or receipt of genetic
services by such individual or family member of such
individual); or
(3) to cause or attempt to cause an employer to
discriminate against an applicant for or a participant in
such apprenticeship or other training or retraining in
violation of this title.
(b) Acquisition of Genetic Information.--It shall be an
unlawful employment practice for an employer, labor
organization, or joint labor-management committee described
in subsection (a) to request, require, or purchase genetic
information with respect to an individual or a family member
of the individual (or information about a request for the
receipt of genetic services by such individual or a family
member of such individual) except--
(1) where the employer, labor organization, or joint labor-
management committee inadvertently requests or requires
family medical history of the individual or family member of
the individual;
(2) where--
(A) health or genetic services are offered by the employer,
labor organization, or joint labor-management committee,
including such services offered as part of a bona fide
wellness program;
(B) the individual provides prior, knowing, voluntary, and
written authorization;
(C) only the individual (or family member if the family
member is receiving genetic services) and the licensed health
care professional or board certified genetic counselor
involved in providing such services receive individually
identifiable information concerning the results of such
services;
(D) any individually identifiable genetic information
provided under subparagraph (C) in connection with the
services provided under subparagraph (A) is only available
for purposes of such services and shall not be disclosed to
the employer, labor organization, or joint labor-management
committee except in aggregate terms that do not disclose the
identity of specific individuals;
(3) where the employer, labor organization, or joint labor-
management committee requests or requires family medical
history from the individual to comply with the certification
provisions of section 103 of the Family and Medical Leave Act
of 1993 (29 U.S.C. 2613) or such requirements under State
family and medical leave laws;
(4) where the employer, labor organization, or joint labor-
management committee purchases documents that are
commercially and publicly available (including newspapers,
magazines, periodicals, and books, but not including medical
databases or court records) that include family medical
history; or
(5) where the information involved is to be used for
genetic monitoring of the biological effects of toxic
substances in the workplace, but only if--
(A) the employer, labor organization, or joint labor-
management committee provides written notice of the genetic
monitoring to the individual;
(B)(i) the individual provides prior, knowing, voluntary,
and written authorization; or
(ii) the genetic monitoring is required by Federal or State
law;
(C) the individual is informed of individual monitoring
results;
(D) the monitoring is in compliance with--
(i) any Federal genetic monitoring regulations, including
any such regulations that may be promulgated by the Secretary
of Labor pursuant to the Occupational Safety and Health Act
of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.), the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), or the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.); or
(ii) State genetic monitoring regulations, in the case of a
State that is implementing genetic monitoring regulations
under the authority of the Occupational Safety and Health Act
of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.); and
(E) the employer, labor organization, or joint labor-
management committee, excluding any licensed health care
professional or board certified genetic counselor that is
involved in the genetic monitoring program, receives the
results of the monitoring only in aggregate terms that do not
disclose the identity of specific individuals;
(c) Preservation of protections.--In the case of
information to which any of paragraphs (1) through (5) of
subsection (b) applies, such information may not be used in
violation of paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a) or
treated or disclosed in a manner that violates section 206.
[[Page S12507]]
SEC. 206. CONFIDENTIALITY OF GENETIC INFORMATION.
(a) Treatment of Information as Part of Confidential
Medical Record.--If an employer, employment agency, labor
organization, or joint labor-management committee possesses
genetic information about an employee or member (or
information about a request for or receipt of genetic
services by such employee or member or family member of such
employee or member), such information shall be maintained on
separate forms and in separate medical files and be treated
as a confidential medical record of the employee or member.
(b) Limitation on Disclosure.--An employer, employment
agency, labor organization, or joint labor-management
committee shall not disclose genetic information concerning
an employee or member (or information about a request for or
receipt of genetic services by such employee or member or
family member of such employee or member) except--
(1) to the employee (or family member if the family member
is receiving the genetic services) or member of a labor
organization at the request of the employee or member of such
organization;
(2) to an occupational or other health researcher if the
research is conducted in compliance with the regulations and
protections provided for under part 46 of title 45, Code of
Federal Regulations;
(3) in response to an order of a court, except that--
(A) the employer, employment agency, labor organization, or
joint labor-management committee may disclose only the
genetic information expressly authorized by such order; and
(B) if the court order was secured without the knowledge of
the employee or member to whom the information refers, the
employer, employment agency, labor organization, or joint
labor-management committee shall provide the employee or
member with adequate notice to challenge the court order;
(4) to government officials who are investigating
compliance with this title if the information is relevant to
the investigation; or
(5) to the extent that such disclosure is made in
connection with the employee's compliance with the
certification provisions of section 103 of the Family and
Medical Leave Act of 1993 (29 U.S.C. 2613) or such
requirements under State family and medical leave laws.
SEC. 207. REMEDIES AND ENFORCEMENT.
(a) Employees Covered by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
of 1964.--
(1) In general.--The powers, remedies, and procedures
provided in sections 705, 706, 707, 709, 710, and 711 of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e-4 et seq.) to the
Commission, the Attorney General, or any person, alleging a
violation of title VII of that Act (42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq.)
shall be the powers, remedies, and procedures this title
provides to the Commission, the Attorney General, or any
person, respectively, alleging an unlawful employment
practice in violation of this title against an employee
described in section 201(2)(A)(i), except as provided in
paragraphs (2) and (3).
(2) Costs and fees.--The powers, remedies, and procedures
provided in subsections (b) and (c) of section 722 of the
Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1988), shall be powers, remedies,
and procedures this title provides to the Commission, the
Attorney General, or any person, alleging such a practice.
(3) Damages.--The powers, remedies, and procedures provided
in section 1977A of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1981a),
including the limitations contained in subsection (b)(3) of
such section 1977A, shall be powers, remedies, and procedures
this title provides to the Commission, the Attorney General,
or any person, alleging such a practice (not an employment
practice specifically excluded from coverage under section
1977A(a)(1) of the Revised Statutes).
(b) Employees Covered by Government Employee Rights Act of
1991.--
(1) In general.--The powers, remedies, and procedures
provided in sections 302 and 304 of the Government Employee
Rights Act of 1991 (42 U.S.C. 2000e-16b, 2000e-16c) to the
Commission, or any person, alleging a violation of section
302(a)(1) of that Act (42 U.S.C. 2000e-16b(a)(1)) shall be
the powers, remedies, and procedures this title provides to
the Commission, or any person, respectively, alleging an
unlawful employment practice in violation of this title
against an employee described in section 201(2)(A)(ii),
except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3).
(2) Costs and fees.--The powers, remedies, and procedures
provided in subsections (b) and (c) of section 722 of the
Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1988), shall be powers, remedies,
and procedures this title provides to the Commission, or any
person, alleging such a practice.
(3) Damages.--The powers, remedies, and procedures provided
in section 1977A of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1981a),
including the limitations contained in subsection (b)(3) of
such section 1977A, shall be powers, remedies, and procedures
this title provides to the Commission, or any person,
alleging such a practice (not an employment practice
specifically excluded from coverage under section 1977A(a)(1)
of the Revised Statutes).
(c) Employees Covered by Congressional Accountability Act
of 1995.--
(1) In general.--The powers, remedies, and procedures
provided in the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (2
U.S.C. 1301 et seq.) to the Board (as defined in section 101
of that Act (2 U.S.C. 1301)), or any person, alleging a
violation of section 201(a)(1) of that Act (42 U.S.C.
1311(a)(1)) shall be the powers, remedies, and procedures
this title provides to that Board, or any person, alleging an
unlawful employment practice in violation of this title
against an employee described in section 201(2)(A)(iii),
except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3).
(2) Costs and fees.--The powers, remedies, and procedures
provided in subsections (b) and (c) of section 722 of the
Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1988), shall be powers, remedies,
and procedures this title provides to that Board, or any
person, alleging such a practice.
(3) Damages.--The powers, remedies, and procedures provided
in section 1977A of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1981a),
including the limitations contained in subsection (b)(3) of
such section 1977A, shall be powers, remedies, and procedures
this title provides to that Board, or any person, alleging
such a practice (not an employment practice specifically
excluded from coverage under section 1977A(a)(1) of the
Revised Statutes).
(4) Other applicable provisions.--With respect to a claim
alleging a practice described in paragraph (1), title III of
the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1381
et seq.) shall apply in the same manner as such title applies
with respect to a claim alleging a violation of section
201(a)(1) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 1311(a)(1)).
(d) Employees Covered by Chapter 5 of title 3, United
States Code.--
(1) In general.--The powers, remedies, and procedures
provided in chapter 5 of title 3, United States Code, to the
President, the Commission, the Merit Systems Protection
Board, or any person, alleging a violation of section
411(a)(1) of that title, shall be the powers, remedies, and
procedures this title provides to the President, the
Commission, such Board, or any person, respectively, alleging
an unlawful employment practice in violation of this title
against an employee described in section 201(2)(A)(iv),
except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3).
(2) Costs and fees.--The powers, remedies, and procedures
provided in subsections (b) and (c) of section 722 of the
Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1988), shall be powers, remedies,
and procedures this title provides to the President, the
Commission, such Board, or any person, alleging such a
practice.
(3) Damages.--The powers, remedies, and procedures provided
in section 1977A of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1981a),
including the limitations contained in subsection (b)(3) of
such section 1977A, shall be powers, remedies, and procedures
this title provides to the President, the Commission, such
Board, or any person, alleging such a practice (not an
employment practice specifically excluded from coverage under
section 1977A(a)(1) of the Revised Statutes).
(e) Employees Covered by Section 717 of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964.--
(1) In general.--The powers, remedies, and procedures
provided in section 717 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42
U.S.C. 2000e-16) to the Commission, the Attorney General, the
Librarian of Congress, or any person, alleging a violation of
that section shall be the powers, remedies, and procedures
this title provides to the Commission, the Attorney General,
the Librarian of Congress, or any person, respectively,
alleging an unlawful employment practice in violation of this
title against an employee or applicant described in section
201(2)(A)(v), except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3).
(2) Costs and fees.--The powers, remedies, and procedures
provided in subsections (b) and (c) of section 722 of the
Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1988), shall be powers, remedies,
and procedures this title provides to the Commission, the
Attorney General, the Librarian of Congress, or any person,
alleging such a practice.
(3) Damages.--The powers, remedies, and procedures provided
in section 1977A of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1981a),
including the limitations contained in subsection (b)(3) of
such section 1977A, shall be powers, remedies, and procedures
this title provides to the Commission, the Attorney General,
the Librarian of Congress, or any person, alleging such a
practice (not an employment practice specifically excluded
from coverage under section 1977A(a)(1) of the Revised
Statutes).
(f) Definition.--In this section, the term ``Commission''
means the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
SEC. 208. DISPARATE IMPACT.
(a) General Rule.--Notwithstanding any other provision of
this Act, ``disparate impact'', as that term is used in
section 703(k) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C.
2000e-d(k)), on the basis of genetic information does not
establish a cause of action under this Act.
(b) Commission.--On the date that is 6 years after the date
of enactment of this Act, there shall be established a
commission, to be known as the Genetic Nondiscrimination
Study Commission (referred to in this section as the
``Commission'') to review the developing science of genetics
and to make recommendations to Congress regarding whether to
provide a disparate impact cause of action under this Act.
(c) Membership.--
(1) In general.--The Commission shall be composed of 8
members, of which--
(A) 1 member shall be appointed by the Majority Leader of
the Senate;
(B) 1 member shall be appointed by the Minority Leader of
the Senate;
[[Page S12508]]
(C) 1 member shall be appointed by the Chairman of the
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the
Senate;
(D) 1 member shall be appointed by the ranking minority
member of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and
Pensions of the Senate;
(E) 1 member shall be appointed by the Speaker of the House
of Representatives;
(F) 1 member shall be appointed by the Minority Leader of
the House of Representatives;
(G) 1 member shall be appointed by the Chairman of the
Committee on Education and the Workforce of the House of
Representatives; and
(H) 1 member shall be appointed by the ranking minority
member of the Committee on Education and the Workforce of the
House of Representatives.
(2) Compensation and expenses.--The members of the
Commission shall not receive compensation for the performance
of services for the Commission, but shall be allowed travel
expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates
authorized for employees of agencies under subchapter I of
chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, while away from
their homes or regular places of business in the performance
of services for the Commission.
(d) Administrative Provisions.--
(1) Location.--The Commission shall be located in a
facility maintained by the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission.
(2) Detail of government employees.--Any Federal Government
employee may be detailed to the Commission without
reimbursement, and such detail shall be without interruption
or loss of civil service status or privilege.
(3) Information from federal agencies.--The Commission may
secure directly from any Federal department or agency such
information as the Commission considers necessary to carry
out the provisions of this section. Upon request of the
Commission, the head of such department or agency shall
furnish such information to the Commission.
(4) Hearings.--The Commission may hold such hearings, sit
and act at such times and places, take such testimony, and
receive such evidence as the Commission considers advisable
to carry out the objectives of this section, except that, to
the extent possible, the Commission shall use existing data
and research.
(5) Postal services.--The Commission may use the United
States mails in the same manner and under the same conditions
as other departments and agencies of the Federal Government.
(e) Report.--Not later than 1 year after all of the members
are appointed to the Commission under subsection (c)(1), the
Commission shall submit to Congress a report that summarizes
the findings of the Commission and makes such recommendations
for legislation as are consistent with this Act.
(f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized
to be appropriated to the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission such sums as may be necessary to carry out this
section.
SEC. 209. CONSTRUCTION.
Nothing in this title shall be construed to--
(1) limit the rights or protections of an individual under
the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101
et seq.), including coverage afforded to individuals under
section 102 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 12112), or under the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 701 et seq.);
(2)(A) limit the rights or protections of an individual to
bring an action under this title against an employer,
employment agency, labor organization, or joint labor-
management committee for a violation of this title; or
(B) establish a violation under this title for an employer,
employment agency, labor organization, or joint labor-
management committee of a provision of the amendments made by
title I;
(3) limit the rights or protections of an individual under
any other Federal or State statute that provides equal or
greater protection to an individual than the rights or
protections provided for under this title;
(4) apply to the Armed Forces Repository of Specimen
Samples for the Identification of Remains;
(5) limit or expand the protections, rights, or obligations
of employees or employers under applicable workers'
compensation laws;
(6) limit the authority of a Federal department or agency
to conduct or sponsor occupational or other health research
that is conducted in compliance with the regulations
contained in part 46 of title 45, Code of Federal Regulations
(or any corresponding or similar regulation or rule); and
(7) limit the statutory or regulatory authority of the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration or the Mine
Safety and Health Administration to promulgate or enforce
workplace safety and health laws and regulations.
SEC. 210. MEDICAL INFORMATION THAT IS NOT GENETIC
INFORMATION.
An employer, employment agency, labor organization, or
joint labor-management committee shall not be considered to
be in violation of this title based on the use, acquisition,
or disclosure of medical information that is not genetic
information about a manifested disease, disorder, or
pathological condition of an employee or member, including a
manifested disease, disorder, or pathological condition that
has or may have a genetic basis.
SEC. 211. REGULATIONS.
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this
title, the Commission shall issue final regulations in an
accessible format to carry out this title.
SEC. 212. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be
necessary to carry out this title (except for section 208).
SEC. 213. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This title takes effect on the date that is 18 months after
the date of enactment of this Act.
TITLE III--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISION
SEC. 301. SEVERABILITY.
If any provision of this Act, an amendment made by this
Act, or the application of such provision or amendment to any
person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the
remainder of this Act, the amendments made by this Act, and
the application of such provisions to any person or
circumstance shall not be affected thereby.
Mr. STEVENS. I move to reconsider the vote and I move to lay that
motion on the table.
The motion to lay on the table was agreed to.
____________________