[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 141 (Wednesday, October 8, 2003)]
[House]
[Pages H9335-H9336]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM
(Mr. LEWIS of Georgia asked and was given permission to address the
House for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
Mr. LEWIS of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, I rise to inquire of the majority
regarding the schedule for next week.
Mr. CANTOR. Mr. Speaker, will the gentleman yield?
Mr. LEWIS of Georgia. I yield to the gentleman from Virginia.
Mr. CANTOR. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from Georgia for
yielding to me.
Mr. Speaker, I want to make all the Members aware that the House has
completed voting for the day and the week. We will postpone until next
week any votes called on the three pending motions to instruct.
Next week, the House will convene on Wednesday at 2 p.m. for
legislative business. At that time we expect to consider several
measures under suspension of the rules. Any votes called on these
measures will be rolled until after 6:30 p.m.
On Thursday, we plan to begin consideration of the Iraq supplemental,
which the Committee on Appropriations is scheduled to mark up tomorrow.
In addition to this measure, Mr. Speaker, we expect that a number of
conference reports could be ready for the House to consider.
While it is difficult to predict the ability of the House and Senate
conferees to reach agreements, I would
[[Page H9336]]
note that the more likely candidates are probably the interior and
military construction appropriation measures.
Finally, I would like to remind all Members that we do expect to have
votes next Friday, October 17, and may be working late that afternoon.
Again, I thank the gentleman from Georgia for yielding and will be
happy to answer any questions he may have.
Mr. LEWIS of Georgia. Reclaiming my time, Mr. Speaker, I thank the
gentleman from Virginia for those comments, and I will continue to
yield to the majority for a response, but I noticed the gentleman
mentioned several conference reports coming up next week and that the
military construction and interior appropriation bills are the most
likely. Would those be the business for next Friday; since the
gentleman indicated that he does expect to be in on Friday, possibly
late Friday night?
Mr. CANTOR. Mr. Speaker, if the gentleman will continue to yield, I
would say to him that we are working to complete those appropriation
conference reports and it may be that the Iraq supplemental and the
discussion and debate on that will go into Friday as well.
Mr. LEWIS of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, the gentleman indicated that he
intends to begin debate on the Iraq supplemental bill on Thursday. Our
side would like to know if it would be possible for us to begin that
debate, since we are going to be here, on Wednesday, so that every
Member, every Member of the Congress will have an opportunity to
participate in this debate?
I take particular notice of the fact that when we debated the force
resolution that every Member of the Congress, all of us, had an
opportunity to participate in that debate.
Mr. CANTOR. Again, Mr. Speaker, if the gentleman will further yield,
I would respond to him by saying that I think it is possible, although
nothing has been decided yet. I know our staff on this side has begun
to meet with your staff there, and we will do everything we can to
cooperate to try and make sure that all have the opportunity to engage
on this issue.
Mr. LEWIS of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, continuing to yield to my friend
from Virginia with regard to the process for floor debate next week, we
were told that an open rule is anticipated. However, as the gentleman
knows, that does not guarantee that we will have the full debate this
serious matter demands. The American people deserve to have a full,
serious, open and candid discussion. Therefore, we expect that the rule
would grant whatever waivers are necessary so that Members would be
allowed to have a full debate and the ability to offer substantial
amendments.
What assurance, what guarantee can the gentleman provide in this
regard?
Mr. CANTOR. I would say to the gentleman, Mr. Speaker, that as I said
earlier, the process has begun with discussion among the staff on both
sides of the aisle. I would say that, certainly, past precedent would
certainly be a guide to what the shape of the debate will look like on
the Iraq supplemental. I would be confident that the chairmen of both
the Committee on Rules as well as the Committee on Appropriations would
be consulted as to the nature of that debate.
I could also assure the gentleman that all the Members on this side
are just as anxious as any to make sure that we fully fund the needs of
our men and women in the Armed Forces, so we can continue with their
mission in Iraq.
Mr. LEWIS of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, I must say to my colleague that I
think the Members on this side, and all Members, want to be supportive
of our men and women in uniform in Iraq. At the same time, I think all
of us need to know very soon whether we are going to have an
opportunity to engage in a full, candid, and open discussion when we
speak of $87 billion.
Mr. CANTOR. Again, I would say to the gentleman that the process is
ongoing, and we will work together to try and make sure that all the
necessary issues are addressed; and that, yes, we will look forward to
discussion and passage of that measure next week.
Mr. DOGGETT. Mr. Speaker, will the gentleman yield?
Mr. LEWIS of Georgia. I yield to my colleague and friend, the
gentleman from Texas.
Mr. DOGGETT. Mr. Speaker, I just wanted further clarification as to
whether the plan remains that, as announced by the majority leader here
about 10 days ago, that we would have essentially an open rule on the
$87 billion to assure that all Members could advance their ideas?
Mr. CANTOR. Mr. Speaker, if the gentleman from Georgia will continue
to yield, I would say again to the gentleman that there are a variety
of factors, as you know, that go into the rule which will govern the
debate on the Iraq supplemental. As I said before to the gentleman from
Georgia, there is historic precedent that will also serve as a guide.
We will consult with the chairmen of the Committee on Appropriations as
well as the Committee on Rules in ensuring that the issues are
addressed in the rule
Mr. DOGGETT. Mr. Speaker, if the gentleman will yield further, I
appreciate that. I had planned to ask that question for clarification
directly to the majority leader, but I understand he has really got
great affection for my hometown of Austin and he has pretty much moved
down there for the time being to try to reshape these districts.
Mr. LEWIS of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, reclaiming my time, on that note,
let me thank the gentleman from Virginia.
____________________