[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 131 (Tuesday, September 23, 2003)]
[Senate]
[Pages S11781-S11782]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
EXECUTIVE SESSION
______
NOMINATION OF KIM R. GIBSON, OF PENNSYLVANIA, TO BE UNITED STATES
DISTRICT JUDGE FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senate will proceed to executive session,
and the clerk will report the nomination.
The legislative clerk read the nomination of Kim R. Gibson, of
Pennsylvania, to be United States District Judge for the Western
District of Pennsylvania.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Who yields time?
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I yield my time to the Senator from
Pennsylvania, Mr. Specter.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Pennsylvania, Mr. Specter, is
recognized.
Mr. SPECTER. Mr. President, I am sure my colleagues want to hear
about the outstanding qualifications of this judicial nominee so they
will be prepared to vote yea or nay.
The Senate is about to vote on the nomination of Common Pleas Judge
Kim Gibson for the U.S. District Court for the Western District of
Pennsylvania. Judge Gibson now serves on the State court, where he has
been a distinguished jurist since 1998. He has gone through the
bipartisan, nonpartisan nominating panel that Senator Santorum and I
have set up. He is a graduate of the U.S. Military Academy in 1974. He
has a law degree from Dickinson Law School, magna cum laude, 1975. He
served with the defenders office helping the indigent. He has had a
distinguished practice and now is on the Common Pleas bench in Somerset
County, PA. He is well grounded academically, well grounded
professionally, and I recommend to my colleagues that he will make an
outstanding Federal judge.
I now yield to Senator Santorum.
Mr. SANTORUM. Mr. President, I associate myself with the remarks of
the senior Senator from Pennsylvania. I thank my colleagues for
allowing the vote to go forward on this very distinguished individual.
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, today we vote to confirm another district
court nominee, to the Western District of Pennsylvania. This nominee,
Mr. Kim Gibson, is currently a judge on the Court of Common Pleas in
Somerset County, in Western Pennsylvania. Judge Gibson is a graduate of
West Point Military Academy and graduated second in his class from
Dickinson School of Law in Carlisle, PA. Over the course of his career
he has served in the Army's Judge Advocate General Corps and the public
defender service. Not surprisingly, the ABA gave this nominee its
highest rating--unanimous ``well qualified.''
With today's confirmation, the Senate has now confirmed 154 judicial
nominees for this President. As I noted this week, the current pace of
confirmation stands in stark contrast to what occurred with judicial
nominees during the Clinton administration. It was not until well into
the fourth year of President Clinton's second term when Republicans
controlled the Senate, before this many judicial nominees were
confirmed. It took President Reagan, during his first term, almost to
the end of his fourth year to get this many judicial nominees
confirmed, and that was with a Senate that was controlled by the same
party. It also took President George H.W. Bush well into his fourth
year to get this many of his judicial nominees confirmed.
In contrast, today, with the shifts in Senate control, it has
effectively taken
[[Page S11782]]
a little more than 2 years of rapid Senate action to confirm 154
judicial nominees for this President, including 100 during Democratic
control. This year alone the Senate has confirmed 54 judicial nominees,
including 11 circuit court nominees in 2003. That is more confirmations
in just nine months than Republicans allowed for President Clinton in
1996, 1995, 1999, or 2000. Overall, we have confirmed 28 circuit court
nominees of President Bush since July of 2001, which is more than were
confirmed at this time in the third year of President Reagan's first
term President George H.W. Bush's term, or either of President
Clinton's terms.
The Senate has held hearings for 13 Pennsylvania nominees of
President Bush's to the Federal courts in Pennsylvania. While I was
chairman, the Senate held hearings for and confirmed 10 nominees to the
district courts in Pennsylvania, plus Judge D. Brooks Smith to the
Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
A look at the Federal judiciary in Pennsylvania indicates that
President Bush's nominees have been treated far better than President
Clinton's. Today, there is no State in the union that has had more
Federal judicial nominees confirmed by this Senate than Pennsylvania.
This is in sharp contrast to the way vacancies in Pennsylvania were
left unfilled during Republican control of the Senate when President
Clinton was in the White House, particularly regarding nominees in the
western half of the State.
Just a few months ago, on May 16, 2003, Jon Delano wrote in the
Pittsburgh Business Times, an article titled ``Despite Bush Protests,
Court Vacancies are Down,'' about how this President's nominees in the
western part of Pennsylvania have been treated more fairly than
President Clinton's nominees. He wrote:
Take the Western District of Pennsylvania, for example.
During the years of the Santorum filibuster, that court of 10
judges had as many as five vacancies. Today, the Senate has
confirmed four Bush appointees--Judges Joy Contie, David
Cercone, Terry McVerry, and Art Schwab--and the fifth
nomination, attorney Tom Hardiman, has just been sent to the
Senate.
With the elevation and confirmation of Judge Brooks Smith
to the U.S. Court of Appeals, the president still needs to
name one more judge to the local court, but once completed,
Mr. Bush, with less than three years in office, will have
named--and the Senate will have confirmed--six of the 10
judges on the local federal court. That hardly sounds like
obstructionism.
Despite the best efforts and diligence of the senior Senator from
Pennsylvania, Senator Specter, to secure the confirmation of all of the
judicial nominees from every part of his home State, there were nine
nominees by President Clinton to Pennsylvania vacancies who never got a
vote: Patrick Toole, John Bingler, Robert Freedberg, Lynett Norton,
Legrome Davis, David Fineman, Harry Litman, Stephen Lieberman, and
Robert Cindrich to the Third Circuit. Despite how well-qualified these
nominees were, many of their nominations sat pending before the Senate
for more than a year without being considered.
The record of this nominee stands in contrast to the record of many
of this President's judicial nominees, particularly for circuit
positions. Judge Gibson received a unanimous ``well qualified'' rating
from the American Bar Association and has enjoyed a tremendous career
as both a litigator and a judge. Far too many of this President's
judicial nominees have limited legal experience and no judicial
experience but significant partisan experience. In fact, 23 of this
President's judicial nominees have earned partial or majority ``not
qualified'' ratings from the ABA. Another nominees to the same court,
Tom Hardiman, has significantly less litigation experience, no judicial
experience and was give a partial ``not qualified'' rating by the ABA.
It is also interesting to note that their local bar association, the
Allegheny County Bar Association, gave the two nominees very different
peer-review ratings. Judge Gibson received a rating of ``highly
recommended'' for the district court position. Mr. Hardiman, however,
received a rating of ``not recommended'' by the same local bar
association.
Certainly, the citizens of Western Pennsylvania deserve a well
qualified judiciary to hear their important legal claims in Federal
court. I am pleased to lend my support to Judge Gibson's nomination. He
will be the 13th judicial nominee of this President confirmed to the
State of Pennsylvania and the fifth judge confirmed to the Western
District of Pennsylvania. I congratulate Judge Gibson and his family.
Mr. President, I ask for the yeas and nays.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There is a sufficient second.
The question is, Will the Senate advise and consent to the nomination
of Kim R. Gibson, of Pennsylvania, to be United States District Judge
for the Western District of Pennsylvania?
The clerk will call the roll.
The assistant legislative clerk called the roll.
Mr. REID. I announce that the Senator from North Carolina (Mr.
Edwards), the Senator from Florida (Mr. Graham), the Senator from
Massachusetts (Mr. Kerry), the Senator from Connecticut (Mr.
Lieberman), the Senator from Maryland (Ms. Mikulski), and the Senator
from Georgia (Mr. Miller) are necessarily absent.
I further announce that, if present and voting, the Senator from
Massachusetts (Mr. Kerry) would vote ``yea.''
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Sessions). Are there any other Senators in
the Chamber desiring to vote?
The result was announced--yeas 94, nays 0, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 357 Ex.]
YEAS--94
Akaka
Alexander
Allard
Allen
Baucus
Bayh
Bennett
Biden
Bingaman
Bond
Boxer
Breaux
Brownback
Bunning
Burns
Byrd
Campbell
Cantwell
Carper
Chafee
Chambliss
Clinton
Cochran
Coleman
Collins
Conrad
Cornyn
Corzine
Craig
Crapo
Daschle
Dayton
DeWine
Dodd
Dole
Domenici
Dorgan
Durbin
Ensign
Enzi
Feingold
Feinstein
Fitzgerald
Frist
Graham (SC)
Grassley
Gregg
Hagel
Harkin
Hatch
Hollings
Hutchison
Inhofe
Inouye
Jeffords
Johnson
Kennedy
Kohl
Kyl
Landrieu
Lautenberg
Leahy
Levin
Lincoln
Lott
Lugar
McCain
McConnell
Murkowski
Murray
Nelson (FL)
Nelson (NE)
Nickles
Pryor
Reed
Reid
Roberts
Rockefeller
Santorum
Sarbanes
Schumer
Sessions
Shelby
Smith
Snowe
Specter
Stabenow
Stevens
Sununu
Talent
Thomas
Voinovich
Warner
Wyden
NOT VOTING--6
Edwards
Graham (FL)
Kerry
Lieberman
Mikulski
Miller
The nomination was confirmed.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the motion to
reconsider is laid on the table and the President shall be immediately
notified of the Senate's action.
____________________