[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 106 (Thursday, July 17, 2003)]
[House]
[Pages H7048-H7058]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT,
2004
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to House Resolution 319 and rule
XVIII, the Chair declares the House in the Committee of the Whole House
on the State of the Union for the further consideration of the bill,
H.R. 2691.
{time} 1239
In the Committee of the Whole
Accordingly, the House resolved itself into the Committee of the
Whole House on the State of the Union for the further consideration of
the bill (H.R. 2691) making appropriations for the Department of the
Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30,
2004, and for other purposes, with Mr. LaTourette in the chair.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The CHAIRMAN. When the Committee of the Whole rose earlier today, a
request for a recorded vote on amendment No. 14 by the gentleman from
Oregon (Mr. Blumenauer) had been postponed.
Pursuant to the order of the House of today, no further amendment to
the bill may be offered except pro forma amendments offered by the
chairman or ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations
or their designees for the purpose of debate and the amendments printed
in the Congressional Record and numbered 6, 15 and 16, each of which
will be debatable for 10 minutes
The amendments printed in the Congressional Record numbered 4 and 12,
each of which shall be debatable for 20 minutes;
The amendment printed in the Congressional Record and numbered 1,
which shall be debatable for 30 minutes to be allocated as follows: 10
minutes to the proponent, 15 minutes to the chairman of the Committee
on Appropriations, and 5 minutes to the ranking minority member;
A substitute amendment by the gentleman from Utah (Mr. Matheson) to
the amendment numbered 1, which shall be debatable for 20 minutes;
An amendment by the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Taylor) to the
amendment numbered 1, which shall be debatable for 10 minutes;
The amendments printed in the Congressional Record numbered 2 and 9,
each of which will be debatable for 50 minutes to be allocated as
follows: 15 minutes to the proponent, 25 minutes to the chairman of the
Committee on Appropriations, and 10 minutes to the ranking minority
member;
An amendment by the gentleman from California (Mr. Gallegly)
regarding bear feeding, which shall be debatable for 10 minutes;
An amendment by the gentleman from Washington (Mr. Inslee) regarding
Forest Service regulations on roadless areas, which shall be debatable
for 50 minutes; and
An amendment by the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Shadegg) regarding
Forest Service land acquisition, which shall be debatable for 10
minutes.
Each amendment may be offered only by the Member designated in the
request, or a designee, or the Member who caused it to be printed, or a
designee, shall be considered as read, shall not be subject to
amendment, except as specified, and shall not be subject to a demand
for a division of the question.
Each amendment shall be debatable for the time specified, and time on
each amendment shall be equally divided and controlled by the proponent
and an opponent, except as specified.
All points of order against each amendment shall be consider as
reserved pending completion of debate, and each amendment may be
withdrawn by its proponent after debate.
Amendment Offered by Mr. Shadegg
Mr. SHADEGG. Mr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.
The CHAIRMAN. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:
Amendment offered by Mr. Shadegg:
Add at the end (before the short title) the following new
section:
Sec. ____. The amounts otherwise provided by this Act are
revised by reducing the amount made available in title II for
``Department of Agriculture-land acquisition'', and
increasing the amount made available for ``Department of
Agriculture-wildland fire management'', which increase shall
be available for hazardous fuels reduction activities, by
$19,000,000.
The CHAIRMAN. Pursuant to the order of the House of earlier today,
the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Shadegg) is recognized for 5 minutes in
support of his amendment, and an opponent will be recognized for 5
minutes as well.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Shadegg).
Mr. SHADEGG. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself 2 minutes.
Mr. Chairman, I want to begin by commending the gentleman from North
Carolina (Mr. Taylor), the chairman of the Interior Committee on
Appropriations, for his superb work in increasing funding for Forest
Service wildland fire management by $82 million more than the budget
request and for his advocacy for the use of those funds for hazardous
fuels reduction. I also want to commend him for reducing at this point
in time funding for Forest Service land acquisition. He has done an
excellent job, and I commend him for the product he has produced.
I want to carry that one step further, and I want to carry it one
step further because we face a crisis in this Nation. America's forests
are burning to the ground, and they are burning to the ground because
they are occupied by excessive vegetation. They are, according to every
knowledgeable expert in the country, grossly overgrown, too dense; and
that is leading to a condition not only of wildfires but of disease
that is destroying those forests.
In my State of Arizona, we are losing 800,000 acres of land to
disease because of this overgrown condition.
My amendment is simple and straightforward. It takes $19 million from
the Department of Agriculture Lands Acquisition Fund, and it transfers
that $19 million to the Department of Agriculture Wildland Fire
Management Fund, and it makes that money available for hazardous fuels
reduction activities, that $19 million dollar.
Mr. Chairman, we are in dire straits. A report by the GAO in 1999
predicted that we have 39 million acres at high risk. Last year alone,
6.9 million acres of those forests burned to the ground at a
firefighting cost of $1.6 billion. The experts tell us that the 10-year
average
[[Page H7049]]
of forests burned to the ground is 4.2 million acres per year.
Dr. Wally Covington of Northern Arizona University has predicted that
if we do not do something to treat these forests, an additional 5 to 10
million acres will burn every single year. This condition cannot
continue.
Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina. Mr. Chairman, I rise to claim the time
in opposition.
The CHAIRMAN. The gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Taylor) is
recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time
as I may consume.
I reluctantly rise to oppose the gentleman's amendment. I know he has
been a leader in trying to provide funds in this project, and I would
say that he has been successful in many ways.
The decision was made to make sure sufficient funds were made
available for forest health and backlog maintenance. At the same time,
limited land acquisition funds are available for the most critical
inholdings and to manage the projects that are currently underway.
{time} 1245
We provided $20 million above the President's request, and we hope to
continue to work in this basic area of forest health and backlog
maintenance.
So I must oppose the gentleman's amendment.
Mr. Chairman, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman
from Washington (Mr. Dicks).
Mr. DICKS. Mr. Chairman, let me say, first of all, that I have great
respect for the gentleman who offered this amendment. I know he is
dedicated on the issue of firefighting.
As the chairman mentioned, however, we have added a significant
amount of money and there will be a supplemental on the floor next week
of $289 million for fire as well. And I just think that we have taken
this land acquisition part of the Forest Service budget down from $132
million to about $29 million, and this would be another $19 million.
You could not even run a program out of this. And if they need the
money, they probably could borrow it anyway.
So I would argue that this is not an appropriate offset. I would urge
the gentleman to consider adding this to the supplemental. If he wants
to add additional money to the supplemental to reimburse the government
for the money it borrowed from a lot of these accounts, the
supplemental is coming up next week. This should be emergency. If the
gentleman was offering it as an emergency measure, not taking an offset
out of land acquisition, I could support it; but I cannot support the
amendment as it is currently drafted.
Mr. Chairman, I hope these suggestions are beneficial.
Mr. SHADEGG. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
I appreciate the supportive remarks of my colleagues on the opposite
side of this issue. I simply believe this is critical. The issue I
raised a year ago was additional funds for firefighting. The issue I am
raising, however, this year has to do with hazardous fuels reduction. I
believe that this committee has done a superb job in fighting to get
the funds to fight fires, but we must reduce the fuel load in our
forests.
In Arizona alone, the Rodeo Chedeski fire last year consumed 469,000
acres. This year's Aspen fire has already consumed 80,000 acres. In my
State alone, this year, we have lost 140,000 acres. And in the Nation
we have lost 1 million acres. I am not fighting for funds to fight
fires. I agree with the gentleman and will support efforts for funding
to fight fires. I am talking about fuels reduction.
We have millions of acres, tens of millions of acres of overgrown
forests in this country due to mistaken policies of the past. We need
to thin those forests, to treat those forests. The Governor of Arizona
has asked for emergency funding to treat the forests in Arizona. She
says the urgent need is $116 million. The need to treat all of the
forests in just my State of Arizona is $700 million. There are 32 large
fires burning in the West as we speak. Seven of those fires are burning
in the State of Arizona, and over 20,000 acres in my State are burning
as we debate this issue right now.
The issue is not fighting fires. I already referred to the $1.6
billion we spent last year to fight fires. We do not have enough money
to fight all these fires. We must treat these forests so that we do not
have the fires to fight. And the only way we can treat these forests is
to move dollars into the fund that allows the treatment of forests, and
that is the fund I have sought to move them into. We must have
hazardous fuels reduction. This is a mere $19 million, but it will help
in the effort.
And with those who are concerned about land acquisition, I want to
make it very clear that we have left a substantial amount of money,
millions of dollars, in the land acquisition fund, because I understand
there are important land acquisitions and inholdings, as the chairman
talked about. I intentionally did not gut that fund or leave it empty.
We did, however, say that we must recognize the catastrophe that our
Nation faces. If we do not reduce the fuel load in these forests, if we
do not make it so these fires do not burn so intensely, and if we do
not treat them, and there is a debate over whether we should treat just
the wildland urban interface or the inner part of the forest itself,
that debate is beyond the issue of my amendment, my amendment says we
have a crying need across America.
I would suggests that the statistics tell us that with 39 million
acres at high-risk, and burning 6.9 million acres per year, as we did
last year, in 5 years there will be no forests left to debate. Those 39
million acres will be gone. It seems to me that this is a modest effort
to look at the critical need of treating hazardous fuels reduction in
our forests. I urge my colleagues to support this amendment.
Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina. Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance
of my time.
The CHAIRMAN. All time for debate has expired. The question is on the
amendment offered by the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Shadegg).
The question was taken; and the Chairman announced that the noes
appeared to have it.
Mr. SHADEGG. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
The CHAIRMAN. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings
on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Shadegg)
will be postponed.
Amendment Offered by Mr. Gallegly
Mr. GALLEGLY. Mr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.
The CHAIRMAN. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:
Amendment offered by Mr. Gallegly:
At the end of the bill (before the short title), insert the
following new section:
Sec. 3____. None of the funds made available by this Act
may be used by the Forest Service or the Bureau of Land
Management to administer any action related to the baiting of
bears except to prevent or prohibit such activity.
The CHAIRMAN. Pursuant to the order of the House of today, the
gentleman from California (Mr. Gallegly) and a Member opposed each will
control 5 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California (Mr. Gallegly).
Mr. GALLEGLY. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself 2 minutes.
Mr. Chairman, I rise today to offer an amendment to the interior
appropriations bill. My amendment prohibits the Bureau of Land
Management and the Forest Service from using funding for the purposes
of allowing bear baiting on Federal lands.
I think it is important to mention that my amendment does not
increase funding in this appropriations bill. Baiting is an unpopular
and increasingly discredited method of bear hunting. States that have
banned bear baiting have not experienced any wildlife management
problems stemming from the prohibitions. Actually, bear hunting
participation has increased after States adopted baiting bans.
Baiting is a practice unpopular with Americans, including hunters,
largely because it runs against the norm of fairness and sportsmanship
and against the widely recognized wildlife management principle that it
is dangerous to make human foods available to bears. Most people
believe it is unfair, unsportsmanlike to lure a bear with food and then
shoot the animal while he or she is gorging on food.
[[Page H7050]]
The four major land management agencies have endorsed the ``Leave No
Trace'' public awareness campaign which warns that people should never
feed wild animals. The campaign materials say feeding wildlife damages
their health, alters natural behaviors, and exposes them to predators
and other dangers. In this same publication, Federal agencies address
waste disposal in the woods, saying: ``Pack out all trash and garbage,
including leftover food.'' Specifically, the National Park Service and
Fish and Wildlife Service ban baiting, and my amendment would ensure
the same no-feeding standards apply to other Federal lands by
precluding the use of funds to encourage the practice of baiting.
Allowing bear baiting is inconsistent with these declarations. It
just makes no sense to think that providing food to bears is wrong
except if feeding is associated with hunting. If it is wrong to set out
food to lure bears for picture-taking or just to watch the bears,
surely it is also wrong to lure bears with jelly donuts and rotting
animal carcasses for the purpose of shooting them.
I ask my colleagues to support this amendment.
Mr. Chairman, I yield the balance of my time to the gentleman from
Virginia (Mr. Moran), and I ask unanimous consent that he be allowed to
control that time.
The CHAIRMAN. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from
California?
There was no objection.
Mr. MORAN of Virginia. Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my
time.
Mr. POMEROY. Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in opposition, and I
yield 1 minute to the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Taylor), the
chairman of the subcommittee.
Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina. Mr. Chairman, I oppose the amendment.
The question is a question of States' rights and management of wildlife
populations. The States have broad responsibility and authority over
resident fish and wildlife, including fish and wildlife found on
Federal lands within a State. Congress has reaffirmed this authority
through numerous acts.
States must be allowed to effectively manage resident wildlife
populations. This is an authorizing issue and a States' rights issue
and this provision does not belong in an interior appropriations bill.
So I must urge defeat of this amendment.
Mr. POMEROY. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
West Virginia (Mr. Rahall), the ranking member on the Committee on
Resources.
Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Chairman, I thank the distinguished chairman of the
Committee on Resources for yielding me this time.
The gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Holt) and I plan to offer an
amendment soon dealing with an issue involving Yellowstone National
Park. This morning, two Members who are in the majority are quoted as
complaining in a newspaper report that we are being unfair because this
matter should be debated in the Committee on Resources rather than as a
rider to an appropriations bill.
I would note that we in the minority are forced to use this tactic.
We are in the minority. The majority will not give our issue the time
of day in the Committee on Resources. The Members making this
allegation should know better. They are in the majority. They know that
the Committee on Resources will not hear or consider our issues.
The situation is different with this particular amendment from the
gentleman from California. He had every opportunity for the Committee
on Resources to consider this matter. In fact, the bill was scheduled
for committee consideration this past Tuesday. The chairman of the
committee, the gentleman from California (Mr. Pombo), scheduled his
bill; yet he came to the committee and had it withdrawn.
So I am going to vote against this amendment, and I am voting against
it on the process that is being used. Perhaps then those two Members
who took issue with my amendment and the amendment of the gentleman
from New Jersey and the tactics that were used will recognize there is
a difference. So we are being forced to offer amendments to an
appropriations bill because we are not in the majority.
Mr. MORAN of Virginia. Mr. Chairman, I yield 30 seconds to the
gentleman from California (Mr. Gallegly) to respond to the last
speaker's comments for the record here.
Mr. GALLEGLY. Mr. Chairman, in response to the comments of the
gentleman from West Virginia (Mr. Rahall) about the bill being
withdrawn on Tuesday, basically we had 1-day notice, and there were
several Members that wanted to be there and could not.
In fact, the chairman had, at the beginning of the markup,
acknowledged that he was withdrawing several bills that day because
Members were not present to vote for the bills. That one was not on his
list of bills to be withdrawn that day.
And so I ask that that be added to for the record.
Mr. MORAN of Virginia. Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my
time.
Mr. POMEROY. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from New
Jersey (Mr. Saxton).
Mr. SAXTON. Mr. Chairman, let me just say that I rise in strong
opposition to this amendment. It has traditionally been the right of
the States to determine what hunting methods can and should be used for
wildlife management purposes.
New Jersey is in a unique position, being the most densely populated
State in the country and having a very fast-growing bear population at
the same time. Our State is in dire need of this management tool. As a
matter of fact, the Wall Street Journal reported this week, and I
quote: ``The New Jersey Fish and Game Council voted to allow the
State's first black bear hunt in 33 years. Officials will hand out
10,000 bear permits in hopes of making a dent in the bear population
that has been ransacking garbage cans, breaking into houses, killing
livestock and mauling residents.''
This is a very, very serious issue, Mr. Chairman. And for the rights
of the residents of New Jersey and the nine States that currently allow
bear baiting, this amendment goes too far in the wrong direction.
Mr. POMEROY. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
Wisconsin (Mr. Kind).
Mr. KIND. Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong opposition to this
amendment. First of all, I do not believe the amendment has any
practical effect. There are no funds currently expended by the Forest
Service or Bureau of Land Management in regards to the bear baiting
that is going on, but there is a larger issue at stake.
This amendment would overturn over 200 years of Federal precedents of
deferring to State agencies, State wildlife experts, and the people of
the States in the management of their own wildlife herds. Nine States
choose to allow bear baiting because it is the most effective and
humane manner of managing bear populations where it is very difficult
to go in and hunt them anyway.
We have had cases in northern Wisconsin where bears are walking into
towns, walking into public school yards because their population is
exploding. If you take this management tool away from States like
Wisconsin, like Michigan, like Minnesota, we fear there is going to be
an explosion of the bear population and an unnecessary risk to
children's lives and other people's lives.
{time} 1300
Mr. Chairman, I think we should stay true to historical precedent.
The Federal agencies have deferred to the States on this issue. That is
how it has been for 200-plus years. That is how it should remain. I
encourage my colleagues to oppose this amendment.
Mr. MORAN of Virginia. Mr. Chairman, I yield 30 seconds to the
gentleman from Oregon (Mr. DeFazio).
Mr. DeFAZIO. Mr. Chairman, the gentleman who preceded me talked about
the threats to the population if we do not have this practice. It has
not happened in my State. We banned this practice.
Real sportsmen do not bait bears. In Oregon, what has happened is
actually three times as many people have bought hunting licenses to
hunt bears. So, actually, the bear harvest, if Members want to call it
that, is up in Oregon because real hunters are out there, not the guys
sitting around waiting for the bears to come and feast on what they are
being baited with.
[[Page H7051]]
Mr. MORAN of Virginia. Mr. Chairman, how much time remains on both
sides?
The CHAIRMAN. The gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Moran) has 2 minutes;
the gentleman from California (Mr. Pombo) has 1 minute.
Mr. POMBO. Mr. Chairman, I have one additional speaker, and I reserve
the right to close.
The CHAIRMAN. The gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Moran) has the right
to close.
Mr. MORAN of Virginia. Mr. Chairman, if that is the case, I reserve
my right to close.
Parliamentary Inquiries
Mr. POMBO. Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman. Does not the Member
defending the committee position have the right to close?
The CHAIRMAN. The proponent of the amendment, the gentleman from
California (Mr. Gallegly), yielded his time to the gentleman from
Virginia (Mr. Moran); and as the proponent of the amendment he has the
right to close.
Mr. MORAN of Virginia. Mr. Chairman, I reserve the right to close.
Mr. POMBO. Mr. Chairman, does the committee position have the right
to close?
The CHAIRMAN. Under clause 3(c) of rule XVII, the gentleman from
California (Mr. Pombo), not being a Member of the Committee on
Appropriations, does not qualify as a member of the committee defending
the committee position, so it is the proponent's right to close.
The proponent of the amendment has transferred the balance of his
time to the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Moran).
Mr. POMBO. Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman. If I yield the
balance of my time to the chairman of the Subcommittee on Interior and
Related Agencies, do we have the right to close?
The CHAIRMAN. That would not represent the requisite unbroken line of
committee affiliation in opposition.
Mr. POMBO. Mr. Chairman, I yield the balance of my time to the
gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Peterson).
Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota. Mr. Chairman, I rise to oppose this
amendment, and I think it is maybe the right timing because the
gentleman before me said real hunters do not bait bears.
I would like to say, in Minnesota, I was a sponsor of the bill that
created a season and made the bear a big game animal. We are having
trouble controlling the population in spite of the fact that we issued
two permits last year to every hunter, and this year we did not sell
all of the licenses. We have three times as many bears now as we did
back when they were not protected.
In Minnesota, last year, we shot 2,915 bears; 2,900 were shot over
bait. The only way a bear can be shot in the northern climates like
Minnesota is over bait. There is no other way hunters are going to do
that. If we pass this legislation, the bears are all in the Chippewa
and Superior National Forests, we will eliminate the ability for us to
control our population. Our DNR is very much opposed to this. It will
take away the chance for us to manage this population, and it will
cause all kinds of trouble with folks that live up in that area. The
bears are starting to move out in the private areas. I very much oppose
this amendment and hope it is defeated.
Mr. MORAN of Virginia. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself the balance of my
time.
Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman from California (Mr. Gallegly)
for his leadership on this issue.
This is a poster paid for by the U.S. Department of Agriculture
Forest Service. This one happens to be distributed jointly with Arizona
and New Mexico's Departments of Game and Fish. It says, ``Just Be Bear
Aware,'' and the reason it says ``Don't feed bears'' is because most
conflicts between humans and bears arise as a result of human-supplied
food. It says, ``Remember, a fed bear is a dead bear.''
This is all about safety to the public. The reason why we do not want
bears to be fed is that they become nuisances, they become a threat to
property and particularly to people. That is Federal policy. All we are
trying to do in this bill is to make sure that Federal policy is
consistent, it is consistently in the public interest. There is no
difference between bear baiting and bear feeding. That is what this
amendment says.
The fact is that bait sites typically consist of pastries, junk food,
the kinds of foods you typically find at camp sites and dumpsters. Once
acclimated to those human foods, bears become aggressive in approaching
campers, park visitors, and they migrate to those areas where those
kinds of treats can be found. That is what leads to property damage,
attacks on people, and the bears being shot as nuisance animals.
The gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Peterson) said they cannot continue
hunting without bear baiting, but I cannot believe that the bears in
Minnesota are that different from the bears in Oregon and Washington
and the 41 other States which banned this practice.
Mr. HAYES. Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong opposition to this
amendment. As a cochair of the Congressional Sportsmen's Caucus, I am
here to strongly urge members to vote against this measure that seeks
to ban bear baiting.
As it has been discussed during the Resources Committee hearing and
during the committee markup on Tuesday, a ban on bear baiting would set
an extremely dangerous precedent of the Federal Government preempting
the authority of the States to manage wildlife.
The State fish and wildlife agencies have the authority and
responsibility of managing wildife and have an excellent record in
years past, especially in regards to bear management. This authority
includes most Federal public lands with the exception of National
Parks, and has been repeatedly affirmed by Congress in acts such as the
National Forest Management Act, Federal Land Policy and Management Act,
National Wildlife Refugee System Improvement Act and Sikes Act, to name
a few.
Baiting has always and continues to be a method of controlling
wildlife population levels beyond just bears. Currently, nine States--
Alaska, Idaho, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Utah,
Wisconsin, and Wyoming--allow regulated baiting as a method of hunting
bears and would be severely impacted by this legislation. If these
State wildlife agencies feel that here baiting is not necessary to help
regulate the population, they are much better equipped to make that
decision than the Federal Government.
As a fellow sportsman and a strong believer in State's rights, I
strongly encourage members to support the State wildlife agencies and
their successful and positive roles they play in wildlife management.
At no time in history has Congress selected an individual species for
Federal management and there is absolutely no reason that it should
start now.
The CHAIRMAN. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentleman from California (Mr. Gallegly).
The question was taken; and the Chairman announced that the noes
appeared to have it.
Mr. GALLEGLY. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
The CHAIRMAN. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings
on the amendment offered by the gentleman from California (Mr.
Gallegly) will be postponed.
Amendment No. 4 Offered by Mr. Rahall
Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.
The CHAIRMAN. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:
Amendment No. 4 offered by Mr. Rahall:
At the end of the bill (before the short title), insert the
following new section:
Sec. ____. None of the funds made available by this Act may
be used to kill, or assist others in killing, any Bison in
the Yellowstone National Park herd.
The CHAIRMAN. Pursuant to the order of the House earlier today, the
gentleman from West Virginia (Mr. Rahall) and a Member opposed each
will be recognized for 10 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from West Virginia (Mr. Rahall).
Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment today to halt the slaughter of
bison in Yellowstone National Park. The bison is a symbol of America.
Like the monuments on our National Mall or the dome on this Capitol
building, the bison is an American icon. These magnificent beasts are
woven into the fabric of our culture, not to mention being sewn onto
the fabric of every uniform worn by an employee of the Department of
Interior.
After a century of wanton slaughter, we have a small herd in
Yellowstone
[[Page H7052]]
National Park, the last remaining example of the purebred, free-roaming
bison left in this country. Is it any wonder then that the American
public looks on in horror at footage of employees of the United States
Department of Interior participating in the slaughter of Yellowstone
bison? The general public is under the impression that these animals
are being sheltered and protected by the Federal Government, not
rounded up and shot. But the numbers tell the awful story: This year
alone, the Department of Interior participated in the slaughter of 244
Yellowstone bison. On average over the last decade, 250 of these wild
animals have been shipped off to slaughter or shot on site every year.
The obvious question is why? Why is the Department of Interior
murdering its beloved mascot?
Should this picture be the new seal of the leading conservation
agency in this country? Instead of a bison standing tall and proud on
the seal of the Department of Interior, it is indeed dead, on its back,
legs standing stiffly in the air.
The reason these bison are being slaughtered lies in the Department's
decision to pander to a single State's deadly approach to wildlife
management. During the harsh winter months, bison migrate out of
Yellowstone National Park to lower elevations in a desperate attempt to
avoid starving to death.
Once they leave the park, they can come into cattle grazing on public
and private land; and some of the bison may carry a disease which can
be dangerous to cows. But here is the critical point: The transfer of
this disease from bison to cattle has never happened in the wild. Never
happened. Yet one State and only one which borders Yellowstone insists
that the only means to deal with a theoretical possibility that it
might happen is to pursue an automatic death sentence for any bison
that steps one hoof onto the invisible park boundary. Talk about using
a sledgehammer to kill a flea. Under current policy, simply being a
bison in Montana is a capital crime, punishable by death.
Perhaps most shocking of all is that most of the bison are not even
tested, not even tested to see if they actually carry the disease
before they are being sent to their deaths. The truth is, this State is
caught in a time warp. Despite the fact that we have entered a new
millennium, this particular State is still pursuing wildlife management
policies that were popular in the 1800s. Moreover, this State has
demanded and the Department of Interior has agreed to help this State
implement its approach to wildlife management by helping them shoot
bison. That must stop.
The National Park Service is one of the foremost conservation
agencies in the world. It should not be required to kill the very
wildlife they are sworn to protect. If adopted, this amendment will
prohibit the use of any funds in this bill to kill or assist others in
killing these magnificent animals. This is a very narrow amendment. If
Montana wants to continue to slaughter bison as if they were still
living in the old West, this amendment will not stop them. However, the
Federal agencies funded in this bill, agencies with a conservation
mandate, will not help them do their dirty work.
The Federal conservation agencies funded in this bill will continue
working within the existing bison management plan to address the
theoretical threat of disease through hazing and capture of bison,
through development of a vaccine for both cattle and bison, and through
the use of other tools. But the tools they use will no longer be
lethal.
This is a very simple amendment. Members either support slaughtering
Yellowstone bison or they do not. We know the American people do not
support the slaughter of this icon of America, just as they would not
support the slaughter of the bald eagle. There is no good reason for
this killing, and I urge my colleagues to adopt this amendment.
Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina. Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in
opposition to the amendment.
The CHAIRMAN. The gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Taylor) is
recognized for 10 minutes.
Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time
as I may consume.
Mr. Chairman, none of us are comfortable with this issue, but let me
provide Members with some facts.
A record of decision was signed on December, 2000, by then Secretary
of Interior Bruce Babbitt, the Secretary of Agriculture Dan Glickman,
and the Governor of Montana. This document was a long-term plan for
bison management in this region.
The main objectives were to maintain a free-ranging bison population
and manage the risk of transmission of diseases from bison to cattle.
Both the State and the Park Service have specific responsibilities
under this agreement.
When we have bison outside the park, bison are captured, tested and
some are shipped to slaughter. On occasion, bison resist the capture or
hazing and are shot. During the winter of 2002, there was a dangerous
situation of this kind involving one bison bull. At the request of
Montana, an interagency team, including the Park Service, shot the
bull.
{time} 1315
Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the gentlewoman from Wyoming (Mrs.
Cubin).
Mrs. CUBIN. Mr. Chairman, I do not understand why some Congressmen
continue to offer amendments about issues that they truly do not
understand, that they have never observed, nor have they ever
participated in the solution to a problem that exists. The States of
Wyoming, Idaho, Montana and the United States Departments of
Agriculture and Interior have worked very hard over the past decade to
protect and sustain the existing free-ranging elk and bison populations
while still protecting the economic interests of the livestock
industries in these States.
My colleague from West Virginia made the statement that it has never
been proven that brucellosis has spread from bison to cattle. That is
simply not true. My colleague from Montana will go further into that
explanation. Controlling brucellosis is a delicate balancing act for
all parties involved. We need to address the needs of each of the
environment, Federal and private stakeholders. Bison numbers are nearly
at capacity for the range in the parks and surrounding areas, and those
herds must be managed. We must actively manage the herd consistently
with the greater ecosystem management plan which has been established
by stakeholders and the Departments and we have to employ sometimes the
unfortunate use of reduction methods. To not do so would upset the
balance of the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem. That is something that
certainly my colleague from West Virginia would not want to happen.
The gentleman from West Virginia's amendment would make the decade-
long efforts of public and private stakeholders in vain by limiting the
use of Federal funds to aid the Park Service in managing the reduction
of bison. I would much prefer the sponsor of this amendment begin
attending the Greater Yellowstone Interagency Brucellosis Committee
meetings as my staff does and learn the complexity of these issues and
the limitations of reasonable solutions rather than enacting knee-jerk
legislation that those of us in the surrounding communities have to
then live with. By taking one of the Park Service's tools out of their
tool box in bison and brucellosis management, this amendment reduces
our ability to effectively control the bison herd at a time when its
numbers are reaching maximum capacity.
This amendment will not reduce the reduction of bison leaving
Yellowstone and Grand Teton parks. Merely the surrounding States will
then have to take a more active role in reduction of their activities.
This is nothing more than feel-good legislation that ignores all of the
facts, all of the stakeholders' concerns and the real world.
Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the distinguished
gentleman from New York (Mr. Hinchey).
Mr. HINCHEY. Mr. Chairman, we must stop the Park Service from killing
Yellowstone National Park's buffalo. More than any other animal, the
American buffalo is a wildlife icon of the United States. The buffalo
is the symbol that represents the Department
[[Page H7053]]
of the Interior. The buffalo is profoundly significant to Native
American cultures and perhaps more than any other wildlife species has
influenced our history.
In the late 19th century, buffalo were nearly exterminated. After
tens of millions of buffalo were killed, only 200 wild buffalo remained
in the Nation and all were located in Yellowstone National Park. Due to
poaching, their numbers were reduced to 25 by the turn of the last
century. The offspring of the 25 survivors, today's Yellowstone
National Park buffalo, comprise the only wild, free-roaming buffalo to
continually occupy their native habitat in the United States. Yet the
Yellowstone buffalo herd is still under assault. Since 1984, nearly
3,700 buffalo have been killed in Montana. This past winter, 244
buffalo were killed by the Federal and State agencies, including 231
captured and slaughtered by the National Park Service. The Department
of the Interior does this under the guise of preventing the spread of
brucellosis to cattle.
Here are the facts. There has never been a confirmed incidence of
brucellosis transmission in the wild from buffalo to cattle. This risk
is so low as to be determined to be immeasurable by the 1998 report
from the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences.
13,000 Yellowstone elk, some of which harbor brucellosis, are allowed
unfettered access to Federal land outside the park. Buffalo with
brucellosis and cattle have grazed together for over 50 years in the
Jackson Hole area south of Yellowstone with no incidence of disease
transmission. Despite these facts, the National Park Service spends
taxpayer dollars to kill buffalo in an attempt to keep them unnaturally
confined within Yellowstone.
Later this year I will introduce a bill that provides a comprehensive
solution to this issue. But until the bison herd can freely roam on key
low-elevation habitat on national forest land adjacent to the park like
any other wildlife, without triggering hazing, capture or killing, the
Park Service should be protecting this wildlife icon in Yellowstone
Park and managing them in a nonlethal manner. The Rahall amendment will
do this. I urge its adoption.
Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the
gentleman from Montana (Mr. Rehberg).
Mr. REHBERG. Mr. Chairman, the last speaker and the sponsor of this
amendment act like nothing has been done over the last few years to try
and manage the herds within Yellowstone Park. I can say that that is
the farthest thing from the truth. This is 10 years of hard work. We
have had agencies that disagreed, we have had States that disagreed, we
have gone to court and sued each other and finally through the good
sense of the Clinton administration and Bruce Babbitt, they signed a
memorandum of understanding on the management of the park bison and
they took it out of the court. In fact, they took it to court, and the
court agreed with this memorandum of understanding.
To make the statement that it has never been passed in the wild, that
is ludicrous. You cannot manage something like that because you would
have to see the cow lick the aborted fetus of the bison and then
immediately kill the cow and test it. We do have proof that brucellosis
has been passed from bison to elk. We do have proof that in captivity
brucellosis has been passed from bison to cattle.
This is also a human health issue. There are people all over this
country and in the State of Montana that carry undulant fever,
brucellosis; and they get it from these animals. The Public Health
Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002, which
we passed and was signed by our President, the act specifies that the
Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services establish and
maintain a list of biological agents and toxins that have the potential
to pose a severe threat to public health and safety.
I turn to page 1. There are only seven bacteria in this bioterrorism
alert. Brucellosis is number two on the list. Anthrax is number one.
This is a health issue. This is a management of the health of the bison
issue. The National Academy of Sciences had a study that was released a
number of years ago that said the carrying capacity of the park is
being exceeded. It has a capacity somewhere between 1,700 and 3,500
bison. As of last week, there are 4,045 bison on the park premises and
leaving during the winter. The riparian damage that they do, the damage
that they do to the very environment we are trying to protect in the
national park is one of the reasons that we signed this memorandum of
understanding with the Federal Government. We finally came to a
compromise. We finally took it out of the court.
This amendment turns back 10 years' worth of compromise, 10 years'
worth of consensus. Take it to a committee, bring it back to a
discussion; but do not undercut the process creating a human health
danger, a herd health danger, and danger to the environment of the
national park. This amendment must be defeated.
Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Let me say once again that the bison is an American icon. In my own
home State of West Virginia, at Marshall University, the football
team's mascot is the bison. They are the Thundering Herd. Nobody
slaughters that Thundering Herd just as nobody should slaughter the
Yellowstone herd.
Are there alternatives? Yes. There are alternatives for dealing with
diseased bison. It is not that difficult. Contrary to what the State
claims, it does not require shooting them. We support continuing
efforts to keep bison from having any contact with cows through the use
of hazing and capturing bison when necessary. We support continued and
improved testing to determine precisely how many bison actually have
the disease. We support allowing bison which test positive to be
quarantined either within the park or on any of the many Indian
reservations where a tribe has contacted the Secretary volunteering to
take possession of bison. All of these activities and more are allowed
under the Rahall amendment. The only thing that is prohibited is
killing these animals.
As far as the counter to our claim that there has never been a
documented instance of a cow catching the disease from a bison, in the
wild, it has never happened. I stress what we are saying here is in the
wild. It is only a theory. If this concern were indeed serious, then
bison would not be allowed to cross the southern park boundary and
mingle with cattle in Wyoming, nor would elk, which also carry this
disease, be allowed to leave the park and mingle with the cattle in
Montana and Wyoming. None of this has led to an outbreak. The numbers
regarding how many bison have the disease are inflated and unproven
because under current practice most of them are not even tested before
they are slaughtered. No one really knows how many bison have this
disease.
In conclusion, Mr. Chairman, let me say that the Department of the
Interior should not be out slaughtering an animal that they are in
charge of protecting. This is not a difficult problem with which to
deal. There are alternatives available. This amendment allows those
alternatives to be pursued. The American bison is to our culture just
like the bald eagle is the very icon of our American way of life. Let
us protect that icon, and let us stop the slaughter of bison in
Yellowstone.
I urge the adoption of the amendment.
Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina. Mr. Chairman, I yield the balance of my
time to the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Goodlatte).
Mr. GOODLATTE. I thank the gentleman for yielding me this time.
Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong opposition to this amendment, which I
do not think makes any sense. It provides, ``None of the funds made
available by this act may be used to kill or otherwise assist in
killing any bison in the Yellowstone National Park herd.'' The national
park herd is not controlled by the Congress. Nature takes care of the
size of that herd. If it grows too large, if we have a situation where
bison are starving in the national park because there is not enough
land to take care of this ever-increasing-size herd, leave aside the
debate about brucellosis and human health which I will address in a
second, you have a very serious limitation on doing anything.
Secondly, the State of Montana has indicated that they are going to
gather
[[Page H7054]]
up these bison that get off of the park and slaughter them. So now you
have created a situation where the people responsible for taking care
of them cannot have any cooperation with those who want to slaughter
them and you are going to break down the scientific ability to make a
sensible decision about when they should be slaughtered and when they
should not.
Brucellosis is a highly contagious reproductive disease that affects
cattle, bison, and swine by causing abortions, infertility, and lowered
milk production. The disease is also transmissible to humans.
Brucellosis is not a natural disease for bison. The disease was
introduced into the bison herd when infected cattle arrived into North
America and then infected the bison. To conclude that it is not going
to work going back the other way, I think, is not sound science. We are
rapidly approaching eradication of brucellosis from the U.S. cattle
herd. The Yellowstone bison herd represents the last significant
reservoir of brucellosis in the U.S.
The Rahall amendment would interfere with the eradication of
brucellosis in the Greater Yellowstone area. For the health of our
cattle herds and our bison herds, oppose this amendment. An interagency
bison management plan has been developed, approved and is being
implemented to deal with this situation. It is imperative that the
National Park Service employees be allowed to continue to play their
integral role in eradicating brucellosis. The response to the problem
that the gentleman has identified of wanting to protect bison wherever
possible is not enhanced by this amendment. This amendment is not based
upon sound science. It is not based upon a commonsense approach to both
protecting the interests of the State and the interests of those who
are very concerned about the bison in our national park.
I urge my colleagues to oppose this amendment.
The CHAIRMAN. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentleman from West Virginia (Mr. Rahall).
The question was taken; and the Chairman announced that the noes
appeared to have it.
Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
The CHAIRMAN. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings
on the amendment offered by the gentleman from West Virginia (Mr.
Rahall) will be postponed.
Sequential Votes Postponed in Committee of the Whole
The CHAIRMAN. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, proceedings will
now resume on those amendments on which further proceedings were
postponed in the following order: amendment No. 10 offered by the
gentlewoman from New York (Ms. Slaughter); amendment No. 18 offered by
the gentleman from Oregon (Mr. DeFazio); the amendment offered by the
gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Hefley); amendment No. 17 offered by the
gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Tancredo); amendment No. 14 offered by the
gentleman from Oregon (Mr. Blumenauer); and the amendment offered by
the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Shadegg).
The amendment offered by the gentleman from California (Mr. Gallegly)
and amendment No. 4 offered by the gentleman from West Virginia (Mr.
Rahall) will be taken at a later time.
The first electronic vote will be conducted as a 15-minute vote.
Remaining electronic votes will be conducted as 5-minute votes.
{time} 1330
Amendment No. 10 Offered by Ms. Slaughter
The CHAIRMAN. The unfinished business is the demand for a recorded
vote on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from New York (Ms.
Slaughter) on which further proceedings were postponed and on which the
ayes prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:
Amendment No. 10 offered by Ms. Slaughter:
Page 21, line 3, after the first dollar amount, insert
``(reduced by $6,000,000)''.
Page 47, line 6, after the dollar amount, insert ``(reduced
by $3,000,000)''.
Page 91, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert
``(reduced by $6,000,000)''.
Page 128, line 7, after the dollar amount, insert
``(increased by $10,000,000)''.
Page 128, line 11, after the dollar amount, insert
``(increased $10,000,000)''.
Page 128, line 23, after the dollar amount, insert
``(increased by $5,000,000)''.
recorded vote
The CHAIRMAN. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 225,
noes 200, answered ``present'' 1, not voting 8, as follows:
[Roll No. 376]
AYES--225
Abercrombie
Ackerman
Alexander
Allen
Andrews
Baca
Baird
Baldwin
Ballance
Ballenger
Bass
Becerra
Bell
Bereuter
Berman
Berry
Biggert
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Boehlert
Bono
Boswell
Boucher
Boyd
Brady (PA)
Brown (OH)
Brown, Corrine
Capito
Capps
Capuano
Cardin
Cardoza
Carson (IN)
Carson (OK)
Case
Castle
Clay
Clyburn
Conyers
Cooper
Costello
Cramer
Crowley
Cummings
Davis (AL)
Davis (CA)
Davis (FL)
Davis (IL)
Davis, Tom
DeFazio
DeGette
Delahunt
DeLauro
Deutsch
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Dooley (CA)
Doyle
Edwards
Ehlers
Emanuel
Engel
English
Eshoo
Etheridge
Evans
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Ford
Fossella
Frank (MA)
Frelinghuysen
Frost
Gerlach
Gonzalez
Green (TX)
Greenwood
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Harman
Hart
Hastings (FL)
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hoeffel
Holden
Holt
Honda
Hooley (OR)
Houghton
Hoyer
Inslee
Israel
Jackson (IL)
Jackson-Lee (TX)
John
Johnson (CT)
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, E. B.
Jones (OH)
Kanjorski
Kaptur
Kelly
Kennedy (RI)
Kildee
Kilpatrick
Kind
Kirk
Kleczka
Kolbe
Kucinich
LaHood
Lampson
Langevin
Lantos
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
LaTourette
Leach
Lee
Levin
Lewis (GA)
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Lofgren
Lowey
Lynch
Majette
Maloney
Markey
Marshall
Matheson
Matsui
McCarthy (MO)
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McKeon
McNulty
Meehan
Meek (FL)
Meeks (NY)
Menendez
Michaud
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Mollohan
Moore
Moran (VA)
Murtha
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal (MA)
Oberstar
Obey
Olver
Ortiz
Owens
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor
Payne
Pelosi
Peterson (MN)
Pomeroy
Portman
Price (NC)
Quinn
Rahall
Ramstad
Rangel
Reyes
Reynolds
Rodriguez
Ross
Rothman
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Rush
Ryan (OH)
Sabo
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sanders
Sandlin
Saxton
Schakowsky
Schiff
Scott (GA)
Scott (VA)
Serrano
Shays
Simmons
Slaughter
Smith (WA)
Snyder
Solis
Spratt
Stark
Strickland
Stupak
Tauscher
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Towns
Udall (CO)
Udall (NM)
Van Hollen
Velazquez
Visclosky
Waters
Watson
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Weldon (PA)
Wexler
Woolsey
Wu
Wynn
NOES--200
Aderholt
Akin
Bachus
Baker
Barrett (SC)
Bartlett (MD)
Barton (TX)
Beauprez
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn
Blunt
Boehner
Bonilla
Bonner
Boozman
Bradley (NH)
Brown (SC)
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Burgess
Burns
Burr
Burton (IN)
Buyer
Calvert
Camp
Cannon
Cantor
Carter
Chabot
Chocola
Coble
Cole
Collins
Cox
Crane
Crenshaw
Cubin
Culberson
Cunningham
Davis (TN)
Davis, Jo Ann
Deal (GA)
DeLay
DeMint
Diaz-Balart, L.
Diaz-Balart, M.
Doolittle
Dreier
Duncan
Dunn
Emerson
Everett
Feeney
Flake
Fletcher
Foley
Forbes
Franks (AZ)
Gallegly
Garrett (NJ)
Gibbons
Gilchrest
Gillmor
Gingrey
Goode
Goodlatte
Gordon
Goss
Granger
Graves
Green (WI)
Gutknecht
Hall
Harris
Hastings (WA)
Hayes
Hayworth
Hefley
Hensarling
Herger
Hill
Hobson
Hoekstra
Hostettler
Hulshof
Hunter
Hyde
Isakson
Issa
Istook
Jenkins
Johnson, Sam
Jones (NC)
Keller
Kennedy (MN)
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kline
Knollenberg
Latham
Lewis (CA)
Lewis (KY)
Linder
Lucas (KY)
Lucas (OK)
Manzullo
McCotter
McCrery
McHugh
McInnis
McIntyre
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Moran (KS)
Murphy
Musgrave
Myrick
Nethercutt
Neugebauer
Ney
Northup
Norwood
Nunes
Nussle
Osborne
Ose
Otter
Oxley
Paul
Pearce
Pence
Peterson (PA)
Petri
Pickering
Pitts
Platts
Pombo
Porter
Pryce (OH)
Putnam
Radanovich
Regula
Rehberg
Renzi
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Ros-Lehtinen
Royce
Ryan (WI)
[[Page H7055]]
Ryun (KS)
Schrock
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shadegg
Shaw
Sherwood
Shimkus
Shuster
Simpson
Skelton
Smith (MI)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Souder
Stearns
Stenholm
Sullivan
Sweeney
Tancredo
Tanner
Tauzin
Taylor (MS)
Taylor (NC)
Terry
Thomas
Thornberry
Tiahrt
Tiberi
Toomey
Turner (TX)
Upton
Vitter
Walden (OR)
Walsh
Wamp
Weldon (FL)
Weller
Whitfield
Wicker
Wilson (NM)
Wilson (SC)
Wolf
Young (AK)
Young (FL)
ANSWERED ``PRESENT''--1
Sherman
NOT VOTING--8
Berkley
Brady (TX)
Ferguson
Gephardt
Janklow
Jefferson
Millender-McDonald
Turner (OH)
Announcement by the Chairman
The CHAIRMAN (during the vote). Members are reminded there are 2
minutes remaining on this vote.
{time} 1350
Mr. TAUZIN and Mr. HILL changed their vote from ``aye'' to ``no.''
Ms. WATERS and Mr. SIMMONS changed their vote from ``no'' to ``aye.''
So the amendment was agreed to.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Stated for:
Mr. McHUGH. Mr. Chairman, on rollcall vote No. 376 I inadvertently
cast a ``nay'' vote. I had intended to vote ``aye.''
Stated against:
Mr. BRADY of Texas. Mr. Chairman, on rollcall No. 376 I was
inadvertently detained. Had I been present, I would have vote ``no.''
Mr. PORTMAN. Mr. Chairman, on rollcall No. 376 I inadvertently voted
``yes.'' I meant to vote ``no.''
Announcement By The Chairman
The CHAIRMAN. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, the remainder of
this series will be conducted as 5-minute votes.
Amendment No. 18 Offered by Mr. DeFazio
The CHAIRMAN. The pending business is the demand for a recorded vote
on amendment No. 18 offered by the gentleman from Oregon (Mr. DeFazio)
on which further proceedings were postponed and on which the noes
prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
Recorded Vote
The CHAIRMAN. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The CHAIRMAN. This will be a 5-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 184,
noes 241, not voting 9, as follows:
[Roll No. 377]
AYES--184
Abercrombie
Ackerman
Allen
Andrews
Baldwin
Ballance
Ballenger
Bass
Becerra
Bell
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Bono
Boswell
Boucher
Boyd
Bradley (NH)
Brady (PA)
Brown (OH)
Brown, Corrine
Capps
Capuano
Cardin
Carson (IN)
Carson (OK)
Case
Clyburn
Crowley
Cummings
Davis (AL)
Davis (CA)
Davis (FL)
Davis (IL)
Davis (TN)
Davis, Tom
DeFazio
DeGette
Delahunt
DeLauro
Deutsch
Doggett
Doyle
Edwards
Emerson
Engel
Eshoo
Etheridge
Evans
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Flake
Ford
Franks (AZ)
Frost
Gallegly
Gonzalez
Gordon
Graves
Green (TX)
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Harman
Hastings (FL)
Hayworth
Hill
Hinchey
Hoeffel
Holden
Holt
Honda
Hooley (OR)
Hostettler
Hoyer
Hulshof
Inslee
Jackson (IL)
Jackson-Lee (TX)
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, E. B.
Jones (NC)
Jones (OH)
Kanjorski
Kaptur
Kelly
Kennedy (RI)
Kildee
Kleczka
Kucinich
Lampson
Langevin
Lantos
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee
Lewis (GA)
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Lofgren
Lynch
Majette
Maloney
Markey
Marshall
Matsui
McCarthy (MO)
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum
McDermott
McInnis
McIntyre
McNulty
Meek (FL)
Meeks (NY)
Menendez
Michaud
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Musgrave
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal (MA)
Oberstar
Owens
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor
Paul
Payne
Pelosi
Peterson (MN)
Porter
Price (NC)
Rahall
Ramstad
Rangel
Renzi
Ross
Rothman
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Rush
Ryan (OH)
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sanders
Saxton
Schakowsky
Schiff
Scott (GA)
Scott (VA)
Serrano
Shadegg
Sherman
Skelton
Slaughter
Smith (NJ)
Solis
Stark
Strickland
Stupak
Tancredo
Tauscher
Taylor (MS)
Terry
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Towns
Udall (CO)
Udall (NM)
Van Hollen
Velazquez
Walden (OR)
Waters
Watson
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Weldon (PA)
Wexler
Woolsey
Wu
Wynn
NOES--241
Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Baca
Bachus
Baird
Baker
Barrett (SC)
Bartlett (MD)
Barton (TX)
Beauprez
Bereuter
Berman
Berry
Biggert
Bilirakis
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn
Blunt
Boehlert
Boehner
Bonilla
Bonner
Boozman
Brady (TX)
Brown (SC)
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Burgess
Burns
Burr
Burton (IN)
Buyer
Calvert
Camp
Cannon
Cantor
Capito
Cardoza
Carter
Castle
Chabot
Chocola
Coble
Cole
Collins
Conyers
Cooper
Costello
Cox
Cramer
Crane
Crenshaw
Cubin
Culberson
Cunningham
Davis, Jo Ann
Deal (GA)
DeLay
DeMint
Diaz-Balart, L.
Diaz-Balart, M.
Dicks
Dingell
Dooley (CA)
Doolittle
Dreier
Duncan
Dunn
Ehlers
Emanuel
English
Everett
Feeney
Fletcher
Foley
Forbes
Fossella
Frank (MA)
Frelinghuysen
Garrett (NJ)
Gerlach
Gibbons
Gilchrest
Gillmor
Gingrey
Goode
Goodlatte
Goss
Granger
Green (WI)
Greenwood
Gutknecht
Hall
Harris
Hart
Hastings (WA)
Hayes
Hefley
Hensarling
Herger
Hinojosa
Hobson
Hoekstra
Houghton
Hyde
Isakson
Israel
Issa
Istook
Jenkins
John
Johnson (CT)
Johnson, Sam
Keller
Kennedy (MN)
Kilpatrick
Kind
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kirk
Kline
Knollenberg
Kolbe
LaHood
Latham
LaTourette
Leach
Levin
Lewis (CA)
Lewis (KY)
Linder
Lowey
Lucas (KY)
Lucas (OK)
Manzullo
Matheson
McCotter
McCrery
McGovern
McHugh
McKeon
Meehan
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Mollohan
Moore
Moran (KS)
Moran (VA)
Murphy
Murtha
Myrick
Nethercutt
Neugebauer
Ney
Northup
Norwood
Nunes
Nussle
Obey
Olver
Ortiz
Osborne
Ose
Otter
Oxley
Pearce
Pence
Peterson (PA)
Petri
Pickering
Pitts
Platts
Pombo
Pomeroy
Portman
Pryce (OH)
Putnam
Quinn
Radanovich
Regula
Rehberg
Reyes
Reynolds
Rodriguez
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Ros-Lehtinen
Royce
Ryan (WI)
Ryun (KS)
Sabo
Sandlin
Schrock
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shaw
Shays
Sherwood
Shimkus
Shuster
Simmons
Simpson
Smith (MI)
Smith (TX)
Smith (WA)
Snyder
Souder
Spratt
Stearns
Stenholm
Sullivan
Sweeney
Tanner
Tauzin
Taylor (NC)
Thomas
Thornberry
Tiahrt
Tiberi
Toomey
Turner (TX)
Upton
Visclosky
Vitter
Walsh
Wamp
Weldon (FL)
Weller
Whitfield
Wicker
Wilson (NM)
Wilson (SC)
Wolf
Young (AK)
Young (FL)
NOT VOTING--9
Berkley
Clay
Ferguson
Gephardt
Hunter
Janklow
Jefferson
Millender-McDonald
Turner (OH)
{time} 1359
So the amendment was rejected.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Amendment Offered by Mr. Hefley
The CHAIRMAN. The pending business is the demand for a recorded vote
on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Hefley) on
which further proceedings were postponed and on which the noes
prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
Recorded Vote
The CHAIRMAN. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The CHAIRMAN. This will be a 5-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 81,
noes 341, not voting 12, as follows:
[Roll No. 378]
AYES--81
Akin
Baker
Barrett (SC)
Bartlett (MD)
Barton (TX)
Beauprez
Bilirakis
Blackburn
Brady (TX)
Burgess
Buyer
Cannon
Carter
Chocola
Coble
Collins
Costello
Cox
Crane
Davis (TN)
Davis, Jo Ann
Davis, Tom
Deal (GA)
DeMint
Diaz-Balart, M.
Doggett
Duncan
Feeney
Flake
Forbes
Fossella
Franks (AZ)
Garrett (NJ)
Gibbons
Graves
Green (WI)
Gutknecht
Hefley
Hoekstra
Hunter
Hyde
Isakson
Jenkins
Johnson, Sam
Jones (NC)
Kennedy (MN)
King (IA)
Kirk
Lewis (KY)
Linder
Manzullo
[[Page H7056]]
McCotter
McInnis
Miller (FL)
Miller, Gary
Musgrave
Norwood
Otter
Oxley
Paul
Pearce
Pence
Petri
Pitts
Ramstad
Rohrabacher
Royce
Ryan (WI)
Ryun (KS)
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shadegg
Shimkus
Smith (MI)
Smith (WA)
Stearns
Tancredo
Taylor (MS)
Terry
Toomey
Wilson (SC)
NOES--341
Abercrombie
Ackerman
Aderholt
Alexander
Allen
Andrews
Baca
Bachus
Baird
Baldwin
Ballance
Ballenger
Bass
Becerra
Bell
Bereuter
Berman
Berry
Biggert
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Bishop (UT)
Blumenauer
Blunt
Boehlert
Boehner
Bonilla
Bonner
Bono
Boozman
Boswell
Boucher
Boyd
Bradley (NH)
Brady (PA)
Brown (OH)
Brown (SC)
Brown, Corrine
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Burns
Burr
Burton (IN)
Calvert
Camp
Cantor
Capito
Capps
Capuano
Cardin
Cardoza
Carson (IN)
Carson (OK)
Case
Castle
Chabot
Clay
Clyburn
Cole
Conyers
Cooper
Cramer
Crenshaw
Crowley
Cubin
Culberson
Cummings
Cunningham
Davis (AL)
Davis (CA)
Davis (FL)
Davis (IL)
DeFazio
DeGette
Delahunt
DeLauro
DeLay
Deutsch
Diaz-Balart, L.
Dicks
Dingell
Dooley (CA)
Doolittle
Doyle
Dreier
Dunn
Edwards
Ehlers
Emanuel
Emerson
Engel
English
Eshoo
Etheridge
Evans
Everett
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Fletcher
Foley
Ford
Frank (MA)
Frelinghuysen
Frost
Gallegly
Gerlach
Gilchrest
Gillmor
Gingrey
Gonzalez
Goode
Goodlatte
Gordon
Goss
Granger
Green (TX)
Greenwood
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Hall
Harman
Harris
Hart
Hastings (FL)
Hastings (WA)
Hayes
Hayworth
Hensarling
Hill
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hobson
Hoeffel
Holden
Holt
Honda
Hooley (OR)
Hostettler
Houghton
Hoyer
Hulshof
Inslee
Israel
Issa
Istook
Jackson (IL)
John
Johnson (CT)
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, E. B.
Jones (OH)
Kanjorski
Kaptur
Keller
Kelly
Kennedy (RI)
Kildee
Kilpatrick
Kind
King (NY)
Kingston
Kleczka
Kline
Knollenberg
Kolbe
Kucinich
LaHood
Lampson
Langevin
Lantos
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Latham
LaTourette
Leach
Lee
Levin
Lewis (CA)
Lewis (GA)
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Lofgren
Lowey
Lucas (KY)
Lucas (OK)
Lynch
Majette
Maloney
Markey
Marshall
Matheson
Matsui
McCarthy (MO)
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum
McCrery
McDermott
McGovern
McHugh
McIntyre
McKeon
McNulty
Meehan
Meek (FL)
Meeks (NY)
Menendez
Mica
Michaud
Miller (MI)
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Mollohan
Moore
Moran (KS)
Moran (VA)
Murphy
Murtha
Myrick
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal (MA)
Nethercutt
Neugebauer
Ney
Northup
Nussle
Oberstar
Obey
Olver
Ortiz
Osborne
Ose
Owens
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor
Payne
Peterson (MN)
Peterson (PA)
Pickering
Platts
Pombo
Pomeroy
Porter
Portman
Price (NC)
Pryce (OH)
Putnam
Quinn
Radanovich
Rahall
Rangel
Regula
Rehberg
Renzi
Reyes
Reynolds
Rodriguez
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Ros-Lehtinen
Ross
Rothman
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Rush
Ryan (OH)
Sabo
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sanders
Saxton
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schrock
Scott (GA)
Scott (VA)
Serrano
Shaw
Shays
Sherman
Sherwood
Shuster
Simmons
Simpson
Skelton
Slaughter
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Snyder
Solis
Souder
Spratt
Stark
Stenholm
Strickland
Stupak
Sullivan
Sweeney
Tanner
Tauscher
Tauzin
Taylor (NC)
Thomas
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Thornberry
Tiahrt
Tiberi
Tierney
Towns
Turner (TX)
Udall (CO)
Udall (NM)
Upton
Van Hollen
Velazquez
Visclosky
Vitter
Walden (OR)
Walsh
Wamp
Waters
Watson
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Weldon (FL)
Weldon (PA)
Weller
Wexler
Whitfield
Wicker
Wilson (NM)
Wolf
Woolsey
Wu
Wynn
Young (AK)
Young (FL)
NOT VOTING--12
Berkley
Ferguson
Gephardt
Herger
Jackson-Lee (TX)
Janklow
Jefferson
Millender-McDonald
Nunes
Pelosi
Sandlin
Turner (OH)
Announcement by the Chairman
The CHAIRMAN (during the vote). Members are advised there are 2
minutes remaining in this vote, 2 minutes.
{time} 1407
So the amendment was rejected.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Stated for:
Mr. HERGER. Mr. Chairman, on rollcall No. 378 I was inadvertently
detained. Had I been present, I would have voted ``aye.''
Stated against:
Mr. NUNES. Mr. Chairman, on rollcall No. 378, do to a technical
malfunction, by vote did not register. Had I been present, I would have
voted ``no.''
Personal Explanation
Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas. Mr. Chairman, I was unavoidably detained
off the floor of the House during the recorded vote of the Hefley
amendment, which was to cut the Interior appropriations by 1 percent.
On that amendment, I would have voted ``no.''
personal explanation
Mr. TURNER of Ohio. Mr. Chairman, on rollcall Nos. 376, 377, and 378
I was unavoidably detained. Had I been present, I would have voted
``no.''
Amendment No. 17 Offered by Mr. Tancredo
The CHAIRMAN. The pending business is the demand for a recorded vote
on amendment No. 17 offered by the gentleman from Colorado (Mr.
Tancredo) on which further proceedings were postponed and on which the
noes prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
recorded vote
The CHAIRMAN. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The CHAIRMAN. This will be a 5-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 112,
noes 313, not voting 9, as follows:
[Roll No. 379]
AYES--112
Akin
Bachus
Barrett (SC)
Bartlett (MD)
Barton (TX)
Beauprez
Blackburn
Bonner
Brady (TX)
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Buyer
Cannon
Cantor
Carter
Chabot
Coble
Cox
Crane
Cubin
Culberson
Cunningham
Davis, Jo Ann
DeFazio
DeLay
DeMint
Diaz-Balart, M.
Doolittle
Duncan
Emerson
Feeney
Flake
Forbes
Franks (AZ)
Gallegly
Gibbons
Gingrey
Goode
Goodlatte
Graves
Green (WI)
Gutknecht
Hastings (WA)
Hayes
Hayworth
Hefley
Herger
Hostettler
Hulshof
Hunter
Hyde
Isakson
Johnson, Sam
Jones (NC)
Keller
Kennedy (MN)
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kline
Lewis (KY)
Linder
Lucas (KY)
Lucas (OK)
Manzullo
McInnis
Miller (FL)
Miller, Gary
Musgrave
Myrick
Neugebauer
Ney
Norwood
Nunes
Otter
Paul
Pence
Petri
Pitts
Pombo
Putnam
Renzi
Rogers (AL)
Rohrabacher
Royce
Ryan (WI)
Ryun (KS)
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shadegg
Sherwood
Shimkus
Shuster
Skelton
Smith (TX)
Souder
Stearns
Sullivan
Tancredo
Taylor (MS)
Terry
Thornberry
Tiahrt
Toomey
Vitter
Wamp
Weldon (FL)
Weller
Wilson (NM)
Wilson (SC)
Young (AK)
NOES--313
Abercrombie
Ackerman
Aderholt
Alexander
Allen
Andrews
Baca
Baird
Baker
Baldwin
Ballance
Ballenger
Bass
Becerra
Bell
Bereuter
Berman
Berry
Biggert
Bilirakis
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Bishop (UT)
Blumenauer
Blunt
Boehlert
Boehner
Bonilla
Bono
Boozman
Boswell
Boucher
Boyd
Bradley (NH)
Brady (PA)
Brown (OH)
Brown (SC)
Brown, Corrine
Burns
Burr
Calvert
Camp
Capito
Capps
Capuano
Cardin
Cardoza
Carson (IN)
Carson (OK)
Case
Castle
Chocola
Clay
Clyburn
Cole
Collins
Conyers
Cooper
Costello
Cramer
Crenshaw
Crowley
Cummings
Davis (AL)
Davis (CA)
Davis (FL)
Davis (IL)
Davis (TN)
Davis, Tom
Deal (GA)
DeGette
Delahunt
DeLauro
Deutsch
Diaz-Balart, L.
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Dooley (CA)
Doyle
Dreier
Dunn
Edwards
Ehlers
Emanuel
Engel
English
Eshoo
Etheridge
Evans
Everett
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Fletcher
Foley
Ford
Fossella
Frank (MA)
Frelinghuysen
Frost
Garrett (NJ)
Gerlach
Gilchrest
Gillmor
Gonzalez
Gordon
Goss
Granger
Green (TX)
Greenwood
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Hall
Harman
Harris
Hart
Hastings (FL)
Hensarling
Hill
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hobson
Hoeffel
Hoekstra
Holden
Holt
Honda
Hooley (OR)
Houghton
Hoyer
Inslee
Israel
Issa
Jackson (IL)
Jackson-Lee (TX)
Jenkins
John
Johnson (CT)
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, E. B.
Jones (OH)
Kanjorski
Kaptur
Kelly
Kennedy (RI)
Kildee
Kilpatrick
Kind
Kirk
Kleczka
Knollenberg
Kolbe
Kucinich
LaHood
[[Page H7057]]
Lampson
Langevin
Lantos
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Latham
LaTourette
Leach
Lee
Levin
Lewis (CA)
Lewis (GA)
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Lofgren
Lowey
Lynch
Majette
Maloney
Markey
Marshall
Matheson
Matsui
McCarthy (MO)
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum
McCotter
McCrery
McDermott
McGovern
McHugh
McIntyre
McKeon
McNulty
Meehan
Meek (FL)
Meeks (NY)
Menendez
Mica
Michaud
Miller (MI)
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Mollohan
Moore
Moran (KS)
Moran (VA)
Murphy
Murtha
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal (MA)
Nethercutt
Northup
Nussle
Oberstar
Obey
Olver
Ortiz
Osborne
Ose
Owens
Oxley
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor
Payne
Pearce
Peterson (MN)
Peterson (PA)
Pickering
Platts
Pomeroy
Porter
Portman
Price (NC)
Pryce (OH)
Quinn
Radanovich
Rahall
Ramstad
Rangel
Regula
Rehberg
Reyes
Reynolds
Rodriguez
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Ros-Lehtinen
Ross
Rothman
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Rush
Ryan (OH)
Sabo
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sanders
Sandlin
Saxton
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schrock
Scott (GA)
Scott (VA)
Serrano
Shaw
Shays
Sherman
Simmons
Simpson
Slaughter
Smith (MI)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (WA)
Snyder
Solis
Spratt
Stark
Stenholm
Stupak
Sweeney
Tanner
Tauscher
Tauzin
Taylor (NC)
Thomas
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tiberi
Tierney
Towns
Turner (OH)
Turner (TX)
Udall (CO)
Udall (NM)
Upton
Van Hollen
Velazquez
Visclosky
Walden (OR)
Walsh
Waters
Watson
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Weldon (PA)
Wexler
Whitfield
Wicker
Wolf
Woolsey
Wu
Wynn
Young (FL)
NOT VOTING--9
Berkley
Ferguson
Gephardt
Istook
Janklow
Jefferson
Millender-McDonald
Pelosi
Strickland
Announcement by the Chairman
The CHAIRMAN (during the vote). Members are advised there are 2
minutes remaining in this vote, 2 minutes.
{time} 1414
So the amendment was rejected.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Amendment No. 14 Offered by Mr. Blumenauer
The CHAIRMAN. The pending business is the demand for a recorded vote
on amendment No. 14 offered by the gentleman from Oregon (Mr.
Blumenauer) on which further proceedings were postponed and on which
the noes prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
Recorded Vote
The CHAIRMAN. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The CHAIRMAN. This will be a 5-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 197,
noes 228, not voting 9, as follows:
[Roll No. 380]
AYES--197
Abercrombie
Ackerman
Allen
Andrews
Baird
Baldwin
Ballance
Becerra
Bell
Bereuter
Berman
Berry
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Boehlert
Boswell
Boucher
Boyd
Brady (PA)
Brown (OH)
Brown, Corrine
Burton (IN)
Capps
Capuano
Cardin
Carson (IN)
Carson (OK)
Case
Clay
Clyburn
Conyers
Cooper
Costello
Cramer
Crowley
Cummings
Davis (AL)
Davis (CA)
Davis (FL)
Davis (IL)
Davis (TN)
DeGette
Delahunt
DeLauro
Deutsch
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Doyle
Edwards
Ehlers
Emanuel
Engel
Eshoo
Evans
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Ford
Frank (MA)
Frelinghuysen
Frost
Gonzalez
Gordon
Green (TX)
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Harman
Hastings (FL)
Hill
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hoeffel
Holden
Holt
Honda
Houghton
Inslee
Israel
Jackson (IL)
Jackson-Lee (TX)
Johnson (CT)
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, E. B.
Jones (OH)
Kanjorski
Kaptur
Kelly
Kennedy (MN)
Kennedy (RI)
Kildee
Kind
Kleczka
Kucinich
Lampson
Langevin
Lantos
Larson (CT)
Leach
Lee
Levin
Lewis (GA)
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Lofgren
Lowey
Lynch
Majette
Maloney
Markey
Marshall
Matheson
Matsui
McCarthy (MO)
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McNulty
Meehan
Meeks (NY)
Menendez
Michaud
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Mollohan
Moore
Moran (VA)
Murtha
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal (MA)
Oberstar
Obey
Olver
Owens
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor
Payne
Price (NC)
Rahall
Ramstad
Rangel
Reyes
Rodriguez
Ross
Rothman
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Rush
Ryan (OH)
Sabo
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sanders
Sandlin
Saxton
Schakowsky
Schiff
Scott (VA)
Serrano
Shays
Sherman
Simmons
Skelton
Slaughter
Smith (MI)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (WA)
Snyder
Solis
Spratt
Stark
Strickland
Stupak
Tauscher
Taylor (MS)
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Towns
Udall (CO)
Udall (NM)
Upton
Van Hollen
Velazquez
Visclosky
Waters
Watson
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Weldon (PA)
Wexler
Woolsey
Wynn
NOES--228
Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Baca
Bachus
Baker
Ballenger
Barrett (SC)
Bartlett (MD)
Barton (TX)
Bass
Beauprez
Biggert
Bilirakis
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn
Blunt
Boehner
Bonilla
Bonner
Bono
Boozman
Bradley (NH)
Brady (TX)
Brown (SC)
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Burgess
Burns
Burr
Calvert
Camp
Cannon
Cantor
Capito
Cardoza
Carter
Castle
Chabot
Chocola
Coble
Cole
Collins
Cox
Crane
Crenshaw
Cubin
Culberson
Cunningham
Davis, Jo Ann
Davis, Tom
Deal (GA)
DeFazio
DeLay
DeMint
Diaz-Balart, L.
Diaz-Balart, M.
Dooley (CA)
Doolittle
Dreier
Duncan
Dunn
Emerson
English
Etheridge
Everett
Feeney
Flake
Fletcher
Foley
Forbes
Fossella
Franks (AZ)
Gallegly
Garrett (NJ)
Gerlach
Gibbons
Gilchrest
Gillmor
Gingrey
Goode
Goodlatte
Goss
Granger
Graves
Green (WI)
Greenwood
Gutknecht
Hall
Harris
Hart
Hastings (WA)
Hayes
Hayworth
Hefley
Hensarling
Herger
Hobson
Hoekstra
Hooley (OR)
Hostettler
Hulshof
Hunter
Hyde
Isakson
Issa
Istook
Jenkins
John
Johnson, Sam
Jones (NC)
Keller
Kilpatrick
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kirk
Kline
Knollenberg
Kolbe
LaHood
Larsen (WA)
Latham
LaTourette
Lewis (CA)
Lewis (KY)
Linder
Lucas (KY)
Lucas (OK)
Manzullo
McCotter
McCrery
McHugh
McInnis
McIntyre
McKeon
Meek (FL)
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Moran (KS)
Murphy
Musgrave
Myrick
Nethercutt
Neugebauer
Ney
Northup
Norwood
Nunes
Nussle
Ortiz
Osborne
Ose
Otter
Oxley
Paul
Pearce
Pence
Peterson (MN)
Peterson (PA)
Petri
Pickering
Pitts
Platts
Pombo
Pomeroy
Porter
Portman
Pryce (OH)
Putnam
Quinn
Radanovich
Regula
Rehberg
Renzi
Reynolds
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Ros-Lehtinen
Royce
Ryan (WI)
Ryun (KS)
Schrock
Scott (GA)
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shadegg
Shaw
Sherwood
Shimkus
Shuster
Simpson
Smith (TX)
Souder
Stearns
Stenholm
Sullivan
Sweeney
Tancredo
Tanner
Tauzin
Taylor (NC)
Terry
Thomas
Thornberry
Tiahrt
Tiberi
Toomey
Turner (OH)
Turner (TX)
Vitter
Walden (OR)
Walsh
Wamp
Weldon (FL)
Weller
Whitfield
Wicker
Wilson (NM)
Wilson (SC)
Wolf
Wu
Young (AK)
Young (FL)
NOT VOTING--9
Berkley
Buyer
Ferguson
Gephardt
Hoyer
Janklow
Jefferson
Millender-McDonald
Pelosi
Announcement by the Chairman
The CHAIRMAN (during the vote). Members are advised there are 2
minutes remaining in this vote.
{time} 1421
Mr. MEEK of Florida changed his vote from ``aye'' to ``no.''
So the amendment was rejected.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Amendment Offered by Mr. Shadegg
The CHAIRMAN. The pending business is the demand for a recorded vote
on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Shadegg) on
which further proceedings were postponed and on which the noes
prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
Recorded Vote
The CHAIRMAN. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The CHAIRMAN. This will be a 5-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 128,
noes 298, not voting 8, as follows:
[[Page H7058]]
[Roll No. 381]
AYES--128
Akin
Ballance
Barrett (SC)
Bartlett (MD)
Barton (TX)
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn
Blunt
Brady (TX)
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Buyer
Cannon
Cantor
Carter
Chabot
Chocola
Cole
Collins
Cox
Crane
Cubin
Cunningham
Davis, Jo Ann
Deal (GA)
DeFazio
DeLay
DeMint
Doolittle
Duncan
Emerson
Everett
Feeney
Flake
Franks (AZ)
Gallegly
Garrett (NJ)
Gibbons
Gingrey
Graves
Gutknecht
Harris
Hart
Hastings (WA)
Hayes
Hayworth
Hefley
Hensarling
Herger
Hoekstra
Hooley (OR)
Hostettler
Hulshof
Hunter
Jenkins
Jones (NC)
Keller
Kennedy (MN)
King (IA)
Kingston
Kline
Kolbe
Latham
Lewis (KY)
Linder
Lucas (OK)
McCotter
McInnis
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Moran (KS)
Murphy
Musgrave
Myrick
Nethercutt
Neugebauer
Ney
Norwood
Nunes
Osborne
Ose
Otter
Oxley
Paul
Pearce
Pence
Peterson (PA)
Pitts
Pombo
Porter
Putnam
Radanovich
Renzi
Reynolds
Rohrabacher
Royce
Ryan (WI)
Ryun (KS)
Sandlin
Scott (GA)
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shadegg
Shimkus
Shuster
Smith (MI)
Souder
Stearns
Stenholm
Strickland
Stupak
Sullivan
Tancredo
Terry
Thornberry
Tiahrt
Toomey
Turner (OH)
Vitter
Walden (OR)
Weldon (FL)
Wicker
Wilson (NM)
Wilson (SC)
Wynn
Young (AK)
NOES--298
Abercrombie
Ackerman
Aderholt
Alexander
Allen
Andrews
Baca
Bachus
Baird
Baker
Baldwin
Ballenger
Bass
Beauprez
Becerra
Bell
Bereuter
Berman
Berry
Biggert
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Boehlert
Boehner
Bonilla
Bonner
Bono
Boozman
Boswell
Boucher
Boyd
Bradley (NH)
Brady (PA)
Brown (OH)
Brown (SC)
Brown, Corrine
Burns
Burr
Calvert
Camp
Capito
Capps
Capuano
Cardin
Cardoza
Carson (IN)
Carson (OK)
Case
Castle
Clay
Clyburn
Coble
Conyers
Cooper
Costello
Cramer
Crenshaw
Crowley
Culberson
Cummings
Davis (AL)
Davis (CA)
Davis (FL)
Davis (IL)
Davis (TN)
Davis, Tom
DeGette
Delahunt
DeLauro
Deutsch
Diaz-Balart, L.
Diaz-Balart, M.
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Dooley (CA)
Doyle
Dreier
Dunn
Edwards
Ehlers
Emanuel
Engel
English
Eshoo
Etheridge
Evans
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Fletcher
Foley
Forbes
Ford
Fossella
Frank (MA)
Frelinghuysen
Frost
Gerlach
Gilchrest
Gillmor
Gonzalez
Goode
Goodlatte
Gordon
Goss
Granger
Green (TX)
Green (WI)
Greenwood
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Hall
Harman
Hastings (FL)
Hill
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hobson
Hoeffel
Holden
Holt
Honda
Houghton
Hyde
Inslee
Isakson
Israel
Issa
Istook
Jackson (IL)
Jackson-Lee (TX)
John
Johnson (CT)
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, E. B.
Johnson, Sam
Jones (OH)
Kanjorski
Kaptur
Kelly
Kennedy (RI)
Kildee
Kilpatrick
Kind
King (NY)
Kirk
Kleczka
Knollenberg
Kucinich
LaHood
Lampson
Langevin
Lantos
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
LaTourette
Leach
Lee
Levin
Lewis (CA)
Lewis (GA)
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Lofgren
Lowey
Lucas (KY)
Lynch
Majette
Maloney
Manzullo
Markey
Marshall
Matheson
Matsui
McCarthy (MO)
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum
McCrery
McDermott
McGovern
McHugh
McIntyre
McKeon
McNulty
Meehan
Meek (FL)
Meeks (NY)
Menendez
Mica
Michaud
Miller (NC)
Miller, Gary
Miller, George
Mollohan
Moore
Moran (VA)
Murtha
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal (MA)
Northup
Nussle
Oberstar
Obey
Olver
Ortiz
Owens
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor
Payne
Peterson (MN)
Petri
Pickering
Platts
Pomeroy
Portman
Price (NC)
Pryce (OH)
Quinn
Rahall
Ramstad
Rangel
Regula
Rehberg
Reyes
Rodriguez
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Ros-Lehtinen
Ross
Rothman
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Rush
Ryan (OH)
Sabo
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sanders
Saxton
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schrock
Scott (VA)
Serrano
Shaw
Shays
Sherman
Sherwood
Simmons
Simpson
Skelton
Slaughter
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Smith (WA)
Snyder
Solis
Spratt
Stark
Sweeney
Tanner
Tauscher
Tauzin
Taylor (MS)
Taylor (NC)
Thomas
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tiberi
Tierney
Towns
Turner (TX)
Udall (CO)
Udall (NM)
Upton
Van Hollen
Velazquez
Visclosky
Walsh
Wamp
Waters
Watson
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Weldon (PA)
Weller
Wexler
Whitfield
Wolf
Woolsey
Wu
Young (FL)
NOT VOTING--8
Berkley
Ferguson
Gephardt
Hoyer
Janklow
Jefferson
Millender-McDonald
Pelosi
Announcement by the Chairman
The CHAIRMAN (during the vote). Members are advised there are 2
minutes remaining in this vote.
{time} 1428
Mr. BURGESS changed his vote from ``no'' to ``aye.''
So the amendment was rejected.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina. Mr. Chairman, I move that the Committee
do now rise.
The motion was agreed to.
Accordingly, the Committee rose; and the Speaker pro tempore (Mr.
Sweeney) having assumed the chair, Mr. LaTourette, Chairman of the
Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, reported that
that Committee, having had under consideration the bill (H.R. 2691)
making appropriations for the Department of the Interior and related
agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004, and for other
purposes, had come to no resolution thereon.
____________________