[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 95 (Wednesday, June 25, 2003)]
[House]
[Pages H5909-H5910]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
REPUBLICAN PRESCRIPTION DRUG BILL
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentlewoman from Nevada (Ms. Berkley) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Ms. BERKLEY. Mr. Speaker, I oppose the Republican prescription drug
plan. I represent the fastest growing Congressional District in the
United States. I represent the fastest growing senior citizen
population in the United States. When I came to Congress, I thought I
would modernize Medicare, improve Medicare, strengthen Medicare. I
never dreamed that I would participate in the destruction of Medicare.
This legislation before us this week destroys the Medicare system.
I oppose this plan. It does not offer a guaranteed prescription drug
benefit for seniors. It ends traditional Medicare that seniors in my
district and throughout the United States rely on. Under this
Republican proposal, there is no guarantee that private insurance
companies will offer prescription drug coverage. While Republicans
estimate that the cost of the premium would be $35, the fact is we do
not know how much the premium is going to be. Private insurance
companies can devise their own plan and raise premiums whenever they
want to meet their bottom line rather than meet the needs of our senior
citizens.
The Republican plan does not guarantee that seniors will receive any
help
[[Page H5910]]
with rising drug costs. The plan creates a donut hole in the coverage.
Seniors who have more than $2,000 in prescription drug expenses are
responsible for all of their drug costs until they reach $5,000 in
medical costs. And they still have to pay the premium. Forty-seven
percent of seniors in the United States fall into this gap.
The plan does not guarantee that private insurance companies will
remain in the market for more than 12 months. Seniors could be forced
to change insurance plans with different doctor panels every year.
Seniors know and trust their doctors. Many seniors have received care
from the same doctors for years. Placing this burden on our seniors is
unconscionable.
The Republican plan does not modernize Medicare. It does not improve
Medicare. It does not strengthen Medicare. It dismantles benefits and
puts seniors into HMOs and PPOs. In 2010, Medicare will compete with
private health care plans. This will result in higher premiums for
hospitals and physician benefits. Seniors, particularly women, will
bear the burden of these increased costs. Instead of dismantling
traditional Medicare, we should strengthen the program to provide the
best care for our seniors.
We should be adding a prescription Medicaid benefit to Medicare, and
I also support adding a provision to increase Medicare provider
reimbursements. Thousands of doctors are leaving Medicare because
Medicare reimbursements do not cover nearly enough of the patient's
health care costs, leaving the doctors to make up the remainder of the
costs. Increasing reimbursements allows physicians to continue treating
Medicare patients while confronting rising health care costs.
It makes absolutely no sense to me that we have a Medicare system
that allows people to see the doctor of their choice, and when the
doctor provides a prescription medication, a senior cannot afford that
press medication. How outrageous is that in our Nation?
I also support provisions to simplify the Medicare paperwork process.
Today, doctors are spending far too much time filling out forms; not
enough time treating their patients. Many doctors say if we could cut
through this red tape, they could devote more time to caring for their
patients. And what is best for the patient is why we are here tonight.
Las Vegas has one of the fastest growing populations of seniors in
the Nation. I owe it to the seniors in my district to support a
meaningful prescription drug benefit; a benefit that is available to
all seniors who need it, a benefit that does not have significant
coverage gaps, and a benefit that allows seniors, and not insurance
companies, to choose their doctors and not force seniors to leave the
Medicare system that they know and they trust in order to receive
desperately-needed prescription medication.
I ask all of my colleagues to join me in opposing the Republican
plan, supporting the Democratic plan that is easier, fairer, and that
our seniors approve and agree with.
____________________