[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 89 (Tuesday, June 17, 2003)]
[House]
[Page H5447]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
AMERICANS PAY TOO MUCH FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUGS UNDER UNFAIR SYSTEM
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Gutknecht) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. GUTKNECHT. Mr. Speaker, let me first of all say that the
gentleman from Ohio who just spoke, he and I strongly disagree. I
happen to believe that it is time to modernize Medicare, it is time to
give seniors more choices, and we will come to different conclusions on
that particular issue. But there is an issue that we do agree on, and
that is that Americans pay far too much for the same pharmaceuticals.
Last week, on Thursday, I was privileged to welcome to the Capitol
and to one of my news conferences a true American hero. Her name is
Kate Stahl. Kate Stahl wears a little pin that says ``Kate Stahl: Old
woman.'' She is 84 years old and she is proud of the fact; in fact, she
describes herself as a drug runner. I would encourage Members to get a
copy of the June 9 edition of the U.S. News and World Report, and they
will see a picture of Kate Stahl in that edition. And in there it says,
and she is quoted as saying, ``I hope they put me in jail.'' Because
what she does every day, working with the senior Federation in the
State of Minnesota, is she helps seniors get access to world-class
drugs at world-market prices. As a result, our own Federal Government
treats her as if she is a common criminal. But she is prepared to go to
jail to make a point, and that is that Americans should not have to pay
the world's highest prices for prescription drugs.
We also welcomed to Washington last Thursday Dr. Wenner from Vermont.
She is working with pharmacists in Canada so that her patients from her
clinics can save, and these are her numbers, have been saving 62
percent on the same prescription drugs by working with pharmacies in
Canada.
Now, the FDA acknowledged at a hearing that we had last week that any
of the evidence about safety is only anecdotal. As a matter of fact, by
their own numbers, they cannot come up with a single case where an
American patient has suffered serious injury as a result of taking a
legal prescription drug from a pharmacy from a different country. We
also know that more people have become seriously ill and some have
actually died from eating imported fruits and vegetables. We know that,
for example, in one year, just a few years ago, over 1,100 Americans
became seriously ill by eating raspberries that had been imported from
Guatemala.
Now, when we talk about safety, I think the real question is, who are
we protecting from whom? Who is really being protected by our FDA? More
and more of us are coming to the conclusion that the only people really
being protected are the big executives of the large pharmaceutical
companies. We ask ourselves, why are Americans, the world's best
customers, paying the world's highest prices? And the answer is,
because we are a captive market and because our own FDA literally puts
a border around our country and will not allow Americans to have access
to those drugs.
{time} 1745
As I mentioned, we import thousands of tons of food every day from
all over the world. Last year, for example, we imported 318,000 tons of
plantains. People say, well, somebody might get into these Fed Ex
packages and get inside the tamper proof packages and somehow
substitute counterfeit drugs, but again, the evidence of that is
anecdotal at best, and if we stop and think just for a moment that if
terrorists really wanted to get at the broad base of the American
consumers, would they really resort to trying to break into UPS
offices, Fed Ex offices to get into those packages and somehow tamper
with those pharmaceuticals? I think common sense tells us that that
simply is not going to happen.
We as Americans should be willing to pay our fair share for all of
the costs of the research and development for the miracle drugs that
are coming out of the pharmaceutical companies that help save lives. We
ought to be willing to pay our fair share, but we have to be willing to
say that it is time for us to say, yes, we will subsidize sub-Saharan
Africa, but we are going to stop subsidizing the starving Swiss.
I am a Republican. I believe that the word ``profit'' is actually a
good word. There is nothing wrong with the word ``profit,'' but there
is something wrong with the word ``profiteer,'' and I am delighted that
we have people like Kate Stahl who will stand on the shoulders of the
sons of liberty who threw tea in Boston Harbor because they saw
something clearly was unfair, and they were not going to take it
anymore. She represents literally millions of seniors and consumers
here in the U.S. who are saying enough is enough, we are not going to
take it anymore.
____________________