[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 84 (Tuesday, June 10, 2003)]
[House]
[Page H5159]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
NATIONAL RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Lipinski) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. LIPINSKI. Mr. Speaker, tonight I rise in support of investing in
our Nation's rail infrastructure and making rail transportation part of
a strong transportation triad that includes highway, air, and rail. The
freight rail industry is one that provides services that are key to the
operation of practically every other industry.
In an atmosphere of mounting highway congestion and pollution,
shippers ought to be changing more and more of their loads to rail.
However, due to the fact that trains are not moving fast enough, these
switches to rail are not being made. With 19th century signaling
systems and antiquated grade-level junctions, railroads are often
unable to deliver a truck-competitive service for many shippers. For
example, trains that should be able to move through Chicago in 6 to 8
hours are taking over 2 days.
While freight rail is a sensible, cost-effective way to absorb the
expected increase in freight traffic, it is also becoming a major
contributor to a variety of social ills, including air and noise
pollution, congestion and a declining quality of life. Rail
infrastructure improvements would raise the capacity of our
transportation network for both goods and passengers; increase safety
along the rail network; improve the environment wherever congestion is
relieved; and eliminate waits at grade crossings. Since passenger rail
service and rail-based transit systems typically share infrastructure
with freight rail, improving freight rail infrastructure would also
provide much-needed assistance to passenger and commuter rail.
In January, the American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials released their freight rail bottom line report
that states that an additional 2.6 to $4 billion is needed annually for
capital investment in our freight rail system. Last fall, the Federal
Railroad Administration and the American Short Line and Regional
Railroad Association commissioned a study that found short line
railroads need nearly $7 billion to upgrade tracks and structures to
handle the newer 286,000-pound rail cars used by the class I railroads.
{time} 2000
So, how can we meet these growing rail capital needs? We cannot
afford to simply rely on the railroads for these funds. The Association
of American Railroads' policy position book for the 108th Congress
states, ``Especially over the past couple of years, railroads have
become increasingly constrained in how much capital they can devote to
infrastructure spending.''
The answer to this rail infrastructure funding gap is the bill I have
introduced, the National Rail Infrastructure Program, H.R. 1617. H.R.
1617 would create a new significant and dedicated stream of funds for
rail projects. Just as we have the Highway Trust Fund and the Aviation
Trust Fund, this legislation that I introduced last month would create
a national rail infrastructure program. The total revenue stream in my
legislation would amount to $3.3 billion annually.
This is a Federal investment that the American public desperately
wants. In fact, Strategies One, a Washington, D.C. polling firm,
conducted a national public opinion poll that shows 63 percent of
Americans strongly favor moving more freight by trains, especially when
the alternative is adding to highway capacity larger and longer trucks.
We cannot afford to sit back as freight and passenger traffic swells.
We must craft a multi-modal solution to this capacity shortfall in
which we can all win, or else we will all massively lose. Therefore, I
urge Members to join the 40 bipartisan cosponsors and me and cosponsor
H.R. 1617, the National Rail Infrastructure Program.
____________________