[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 79 (Monday, June 2, 2003)]
[House]
[Page H4763]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
FCC VOTE ON MEDIA CROSS-OWNERSHIP
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Chocola). Under a previous order of the
House, the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Watson) is recognized for 5
minutes.
Ms. WATSON of California. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to voice my
utmost frustration and disappointment with the Federal Communication
Commission's vote today to relax media cross-ownership rules. I am
frustrated by the process through which the Republican-controlled
commission sought to manipulate its rulemaking by limiting public input
and discussion. I am frustrated that the majority on the commission
chose to ignore the overwhelming public opposition to the proposed
rules, and I am disappointed that these commissioners failed to learn
from existing evidence, especially in the area of radio ownership, the
dangerous impacts of unfettered media consolidation.
By voting to radically deregulate media ownership, this
administration has created the most unimaginable atmosphere for further
national and local concentration of media outlets, leading to the
erosion of localism, diversity and competition so essential to a
healthy democracy. I fear that as the media conglomerates move forward
with the rulings and gobble up more and more independent outlets, not
only will the consumers suffer from the lack of diverse voices on our
airwaves, but the core values of what it means to live in a free and
open society will be greatly demolished.
Many of my colleagues in both Chambers of Congress have expressed a
great deal of skepticism toward today's FCC rule. Close to 150 Members
of this House, including the Congressional Black Caucus, Hispanic
Caucus and Asian and Pacific American Caucus have asked the FCC to
delay its decision. That came in addition to nearly 750,000 e-mails,
letters and phone calls from the public to the FCC expressing their
opposition to the current rulemaking process and the rule. All of them,
including a letter I sent on behalf of 28 other Members of the
Congressional Black Caucus, have fallen on deaf ears.
Over the entire course of the rulemaking process, FCC Chairman Powell
has held only two public hearings while meeting 71 times, I repeat, 71
times, with top broadcasters behind closed doors. How can we say that
the FCC is following Congressional statutory guidance to serve the
public's interest? How is the FCC performing its special duty as
mandated by the Supreme Court to protect an uninhibited marketplace of
ideas?
Chairman Powell says that the rule changes will help preserve free,
over-the-air television, but free, over-the-air television is alive and
well. Advertising revenues for free, over-the-air television were up 15
percent last year. However, it is not the job of the FCC to make sure
that every network in this country makes a lot of money. It is the job
of the FCC to make sure that Americans get a variety and diversity of
viewpoints.
The bottom line is that as the rule changes lead to greater media
consolidation, small and independent companies will be drowned out.
Some critics have called it ``the Wal-Mart effect,'' ``the emergence of
a 21st century Citizen Kane,'' as noted by Commissioner Adelstein. The
big five media companies, Disney, Viacom, AOL-Time Warner, News Corp.
and General Electric Company will end up squeezing out the small
companies. It is already happening. The new rules will only speed up
the process.
Ted Turner is right in saying that when small businesses get hurt,
big ideas get lost. When the next Watergate happens, Americans need to
know that a truly independent third estate will be up to the task of
conducting a free and independent investigation. Minorities are deeply
suspicious of the rule changes. There is ample precedent for their
feelings since the passage of the 1996 Telecommunications Act which
resulted in a frenzy of media consolidation, radio station ownership
has decreased by 30 percent. Many of the stations gobbled up were
minority owned.
It was a bad decision at the FCC today.
Minority broadcasters believe that media consolidation has all but
eliminated opportunities they need to expand their media companies.
They can't expand or compete with the big players and are often left
with one alternative: To sell.
It would have been prudent for the FCC to allow more time for public
hearings as well as congressional input. We have been presented with a
backroom deal that will dramatically change the structure of our media
marketplace, significantly impact media diversity, and inhibit the free
flow of information.
Today's adoption of media ownership rules represent a giant step
backward for consumers, and as members of Congress we have a
responsibility to exercise our legislative oversight role. As
Commissioner Copps said today, this is only the beginning. I strongly
urge my colleagues and the public to take up this important debate.
____________________