[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 76 (Wednesday, May 21, 2003)]
[House]
[Pages H4518-H4519]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
UNCOVERING A GOVERNMENT COVERUP
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Ose). Under a previous order of the
House, the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Sandlin) is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mr. SANDLIN. Mr. Speaker, as you know, we are here tonight to discuss
a very chilling issue, the intentional destruction of evidence by a
government agency and the subsequent stone-walling and coverup by the
Federal Government.
Mr. Speaker, as has been discussed here previously, Members of the
Texas State Legislature recently properly excused themselves from the
floor of the Texas statehouse in order to break a quorum, a proper
procedure provided for by the House rules and by the Constitution. This
angered partisan Republican interests in Washington, and thereafter the
Homeland Security Department, charged with fighting terrorism in this
country, used Federal Government assets for political purposes, trying
to track the plane of former Democratic Speaker of the House Pete
Laney.
Embarrassingly, Secretary Tom Ridge and the Department of Homeland
Security has now been forced to admit that they have an audiotape and a
transcript of communications between Homeland Security and Texas law
enforcement; and, despite that admission they were forced to make, the
Department of Homeland Security has said they will not release the
tape, thus taking part in this improper coverup.
This morning, further disturbing news came out of Austin, the State's
capital. As I mentioned earlier, there is an admission of communication
between Homeland Security and law enforcement in Texas. When the
Department of Public Safety learned that inquiries were being made to
obtain this information, they went into high gear, presumably at the
direction of higher-ups, because, Mr. Speaker, as we were all shocked
and dismayed to learn, the information held by the Department of Public
Safety was intentionally destroyed, another part of the coverup.
Here is the quote from the DPS Commander of Special Crime Service,
Tony Marshall, in an e-mail uncovered by the Fort Worth Star Telegram
under an open records request. The DPS got caught with this e-mail.
``Any notes, correspondence, photos, et cetera, that were obtained
pursuant to the absconded House of Representatives members should be
destroyed immediately. No copies are to be kept.''
In an attempt to cover up this coverup, DPS exacerbated the problem
with this statement. ``This is why DPS destroyed the records. We are
prohibited under the Code of Federal Regulations, 28 CFR part 23, from
keeping intelligence information that is not related to criminal
conduct or activity,'' and it goes on.
There are only two problems with that statement. First, it simply is
not true. Nothing in the regulations suggests, demands or requires the
destruction of evidence. Secondly, it is improper and in violation of
the law to collect this information in the first place.
You see, as with most cover-ups, they failed to tell you the whole
story, and each new story makes the last story worse, because the truth
is the very regulation that the DPS incorrectly cites as the reason to
destroy this evidence states that there must be ``a reasonable
suspicion that the individual is
[[Page H4519]]
engaged in criminal conduct or activity as a condition precedent to
entering this information in the data bank in the first place.''
In other words, to even collect this information, there must be a
reasonable allegation that a crime has been committed.
This data is for tracking criminals. The regulation specifically
mentions crimes such as drug trafficking, loan sharking, trafficking in
stolen property, gambling, extortion, smuggling, bribery, corruption.
Homeland Security and DPS, in one of their many stories, claimed that
they were merely looking for a plane that they thought was missing or
may have crashed. Now, of course that is not true either. But missing
planes are located through the FAA and law enforcement, not by using
criminal databases improperly in violation of the law.
Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.
Homeland Security, produce the tapes. Homeland Security, produce the
transcripts. Department of Public Safety, do the same.
We respect DPS in Texas. They are a great agency. We know they were
not doing it independently. They were doing it at the direction of
others. They were following orders.
You know, Sharon Watkins blew the whistle on Enron. Arthur Andersen
got caught shredding documents. Cover-ups just do not work.
Is this a serious problem, or is it just a third-rate burglary, as we
learned about in our history lessons? Mr. Speaker, only time will tell.
____________________