[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 74 (Monday, May 19, 2003)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6586-S6587]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
EXECUTIVE SESSION
NOMINATION OF S. MAURICE HICKS, JR., OF LOUISIANA, TO BE UNITED STATES
DISTRICT JUDGE FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the Senate will go
into executive session to consider the Executive Calendar order No.
172. The clerk will report.
The legislative clerk read the nomination of S. Maurice Hicks, Jr.,
of Louisiana, to be United States District Judge for the Western
District of Louisiana.
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, I ask for the yeas and nays.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There is a sufficient second.
The question is, Will the Senate advise and consent to the nomination
of S. Maurice Hicks, Jr., of Louisiana, to be United States District
Judge for the Western District of Louisiana?
The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk called the roll.
Mr. McCONNELL. I announce that the Senator from Utah (Mr. Bennett),
the Senator from Idaho (Mr. Craig), the Senator from Alaska (Ms.
Murkowski), the Senator from Oregon (Mr. Smith), the Senator from
Missouri (Mr. Talent), and the Senator from Wyoming (Mr. Thomas) are
necessarily absent.
Mr. REID. I announce that the Senator from Indiana (Mr. Bayh), the
Senator from Illinois (Mr. Durbin), the Senator from North Carolina
(Mr. Edwards), the Senator from Florida (Mr. Graham), the Senator from
Hawaii (Mr. Inouye), the Senator from Massachusetts (Mr. Kerry), the
Senator from New Jersey (Mr. Lautenberg), and the Senator from
Connecticut (Mr. Lieberman) are necessarily absent.
I further announce that, if present and voting, the Senator from
Indiana (Mr. Bayh) and the Senator from Massachusetts (Mr. Kerry) would
each vote ``aye.''
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Coleman). Are there any other Senators in
the Chamber desiring to vote?
The result was announced--yeas 86, nays 0, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 184 Ex.]
YEAS--86
Akaka
Alexander
Allard
Allen
Baucus
Biden
Bingaman
Bond
Boxer
Breaux
Brownback
Bunning
Burns
Byrd
Campbell
Cantwell
Carper
Chafee
Chambliss
Clinton
Cochran
Coleman
Collins
Conrad
Cornyn
Corzine
Crapo
Daschle
Dayton
DeWine
Dodd
Dole
Domenici
Dorgan
Ensign
Enzi
Feingold
Feinstein
Fitzgerald
Frist
Graham (SC)
Grassley
Gregg
Hagel
Harkin
Hatch
Hollings
Hutchison
Inhofe
Jeffords
Johnson
Kennedy
Kohl
Kyl
Landrieu
Leahy
Levin
Lincoln
Lott
Lugar
McCain
McConnell
Mikulski
Miller
Murray
Nelson (FL)
Nelson (NE)
Nickles
Pryor
Reed
Reid
Roberts
Rockefeller
Santorum
Sarbanes
Schumer
Sessions
Shelby
Snowe
Specter
Stabenow
Stevens
Sununu
Voinovich
Warner
Wyden
NOT VOTING--14
Bayh
Bennett
Craig
Durbin
Edwards
Graham (FL)
Inouye
Kerry
Lautenberg
Lieberman
Murkowski
Smith
Talent
Thomas
The nomination was confirmed.
Mr. DASCHLE. Mr. President, I move to reconsider the vote, and move
to lay that motion on the table.
The motion to lay on the table was agreed to.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the President will
be notified of the Senate's action.
Mr. HATCH. Mr. President, I am pleased today to rise in support of S.
Maurice Hicks, who has been confirmed to be a nominee to the U.S.
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana.
Mr. Hicks has had a distinguished legal career. Upon graduation from
Louisiana State University Law School, he worked for the Louisiana
Legislative Council. Soon afterwards,
[[Page S6587]]
he began his 25-year career in private practice as an associate in a
Shreveport law firm. He subsequently founded his own law firm and
developed an expertise in commercial and insurance-related litigation
in State and Federal courts, including general aviation accidents,
automobile accidents, product liability, lender liability claims,
construction disputes, intellectual property claims, and insurance
coverage questions, as well as oil and gas accident and contamination
claims. He also has a great deal of experience representing individuals
on a wide variety of personal matters including estate planning,
personal injury claims, contract negotiations, copyright issues, and
general legal matters. All told, he has tried an estimated 150 cases to
judgment, acting as sole or lead counsel in the vast majority of them.
He has also devoted time in his legal career to pro bono work,
including preparing wills for the elderly and working with adjudicated
juveniles.
He is a member of the Louisiana State Bar, the American Bar
Association, and the Shreveport Bar Association.
I am confident that Mr. Hicks's extensive litigation experience will
make him an excellent addition to the Federal bench.
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, the Senate has confirmed the nomination of
Maurice Hicks to be a United States District Court Judge for the
Western District of Louisiana. Maurice Hicks has spent 25 years as a
litigator in Shreveport, LA, where he has appeared frequently in State
and Federal courts. He comes to us with the support of his home State
Senators. Mr. Hicks is the seventh nominee of President Bush to be
confirmed to the Federal courts in Louisiana. Just this year, the
Senate already confirmed Dee Drell and Patricia Minaldi to the United
States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana. With these
confirmations, there are no longer any current vacancies in the Federal
courts in Louisiana.
Under my chairmanship last Congress, the Senate Judiciary Committee
held the first hearing for a Fifth Circuit nominee in 7 years. Judge
Edith Brown Clement of Louisiana was promptly given a hearing in
October 2001 and confirmed in November 2001, despite the fact that
three of President Clinton's Fifth Circuit nominees never received a
hearing, including H. Alston Johnson of Louisiana. The Democrats turned
the other cheek on past obstruction by the Republicans in order to move
forward. In fact, with Democratic support, the Senate recently
confirmed another nominee to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, Judge
Edward Prado, despite the fact that President Clinton's Hispanic
nominees to that court, Enrique Moreno and Jorge Rangel, never received
a hearing or a vote.
With the confirmation of Mr. Hicks, the Senate will have confirmed 25
of President Bush's judicial nominees so far this year and 125 overall.
So far this year we have confirmed more judicial nominees of President
Bush than the Republican majority was willing to confirm in the entire
1996 session when President Clinton was in the White House. That entire
year only 17 judges were confirmed all year and that included none to
the circuit courts, not one. In contrast, already this session, 5
circuit court nominees, including several highly controversial
nominees, have been confirmed among the 25 judges the Senate has
approved to date. Those confirmations--including two that had more
negative votes than the required number to be filibustered but who were
not filibustered never get acknowledged in partisan Republican talking
points.
We are also almost 6 months ahead of the pace the Republican majority
set in 1999 when it considered President Clinton's judicial nominees.
It was not until October that the Senate confirmed as many as 25
judicial nominees in 1999.
In the 17 months when I chaired the Judiciary Committee, we were able
to confirm 100 judges and vastly reduce the judicial vacancies that
Republicans had stored up by refusing to allow scores of judicial
nominees of President Clinton to be considered. We were able to do so
despite the White House's refusal to work with Democrats on circuit
court vacancies and many district court vacancies.
With Mr. Hicks' confirmation, the Senate will have succeeded in
reducing the number of Federal judicial vacancies to the lowest level
it has been in 13 years. The 110 vacancies that I inherited in the
summer of 2001 have been more than cut in half. In the 17 months that I
chaired the Judiciary Committee we not only kept up with attrition, but
reduced those vacancies from 110 to 60 and with Mr. Hicks's
confirmation we will only have 46 vacancies for the entire Federal
judiciary. I congratulate Mr. Hicks and his family on his confirmation.
Republican talking points will likely focus on the impasse on 2 of
the most extreme of the President's nominations rather than the 125
confirmations and the lowest judicial vacancy rate in 13 years. They
will ignore their own recent filibusters against President Clinton's
executive and judicial nominees in so doing and their own delays in
considering some of this President's judicial nominees.
I continue to be disappointed that the Republican leadership has not
found time to proceed to the nomination of Judge Consuelo Callahan to
the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. This is
another of the judicial nominees that Senate Democrats has strongly
supported and whose consideration we had expedited through the
Judiciary Committee weeks ago.
Just as Senate Democrats cleared the nomination of Judge Edward Prado
to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit without
delay, so, too, the nomination of Judge Callahan, another Hispanic
nominee to another circuit court, was cleared on the Democratic side.
All Democratic Senators serving on the Judiciary Committee voted to
report this nomination favorably. All Democratic Senators had indicated
that they are prepared to proceed to this nomination and, after a
reasonable period of debate, vote on the nomination. I am confident
this nomination will be confirmed by an extraordinary majority--maybe
unanimously.
It is most unfortunate that so many partisans in this administration
and on the other side of the aisle insist on bogging down consensus
matters and consensus nominees in order to focus exclusively on the
most divisive and controversial of this President's nominees as he
continues his efforts to pack the courts. Democratic Senators have
worked very hard to cooperate with this administration in order to fill
judicial vacancies. What the other side seeks to obscure is that
effort, that fairness and the progress we have been able to achieve
without much help from the other side or the administration. Judge
Callahan's nomination has been delayed on the Senate Executive Calendar
unnecessarily in my view. It is time to act on this nomination and make
progress.
____________________