[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 73 (Thursday, May 15, 2003)]
[House]
[Pages H4178-H4179]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
TEXAS REDISTRICTING
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Texas (Mr. Bell) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. BELL. Mr. Speaker, this gives us a great opportunity to talk
about what has transpired in Austin, Texas, and Ardmore, Oklahoma, over
the course of this week and what really has transpired throughout the
Nation and to set the record straight. I appreciate having this
opportunity. During the course of the debate which has taken place this
week, there have been some very large misstatements of fact. This gives
us a chance to correct the record on some of those issues.
There has been a lot of finger-wagging by the majority leader, Mr.
DeLay, along with the Speaker of the Texas House, Mr. Craddick, acting
as if they were terribly surprised by the Democrats' reaction to this
redistricting bill that was going to be jammed down their throats.
Mr. Speaker, we can look back to editorials in almost every major
Texas newspaper dating back to January of this year where almost every
major newspaper took an editorial position that because of the problems
facing the State of Texas, because of the challenges that the Texas
legislature would be facing because they only meet every 2 years and
they have a very limited amount of time to address those challenges,
every major newspaper editorialized that redistricting should be stayed
away from. Redistricting had already been accomplished by the courts
just 2 years ago. There was absolutely no reason to take an absolutely
unprecedented course of action and take up redistricting in what was
obviously nonsense this year.
But despite those warnings and the warnings set forth very clearly
that redistricting would be an incredibly partisan issue, an incredibly
divisive issue and would distract from everything that the legislature
needed to accomplish, despite those warnings, the majority leader of
this body decided to march forward with this very partisan power grab.
And so what we saw happen this week with 53 very courageous Democrats
from the State House of Representatives going to Ardmore, Oklahoma, had
to be expected. There was no surprise. Everybody knew that they would
take a stand, that they would fight back. For them to now act as if
they were completely shocked is absolutely absurd and absolutely
ridiculous.
Another question that has been raised during the course of this
debate is that is this not politics as usual and now that the
Republicans have a majority in the State House, should this not be
expected; should they not try to change the majority of congressional
districts in the State of Texas since Texas is a majority Republican
State. Again, that is a little bit misleading. Because Texas already
has a majority of Republican congressional districts. In fact, if one
looks at the voter percentages and the voter history in each of the
congressional districts in the State of Texas, there are 20 Republican
districts and there are only 12 Democratic districts.
Why then is there a Democratic majority? Why are there 17 Democrats
and 15 Republicans elected to Congress from the State of Texas? That is
rather simple. Because in five of those Republican districts, the
voters, Mr. Speaker, have decided that they like their Democratic
Representatives and have returned them time and time again to the U.S.
House of Representatives. That is what in Texas and I think everywhere
else in the United States we call democracy. Under this plan, the
secret plan that finally saw the light of day that Mr. DeLay is
proposing, Mr. Speaker, it would change all that by going in and
tearing apart districts, tearing apart communities that have been
together for years and years, destroying those districts as they exist
today to make it practically impossible for the Representatives, the
[[Page H4179]]
Democratic Representatives who currently serve in those districts, to
be reelected. That is not what we call democracy, Mr. Speaker. That is
what we call a very partisan power grab.
The heroes from the State House of Representatives in Texas who went
to Ardmore, Oklahoma, this week have been criticized by many on the
other side of the aisle. They have said that they should be in Austin
carrying out the people's business, they should be there to vote on the
legislation which is before them. But interestingly, I heard none of
those same complaints just last week when the majority leader of this
body decided it was more important to be in Austin, Texas, to lobby for
his secret redistricting plan instead of being here in Washington,
D.C., along with the rest of us voting on the legislation which was
before us. I heard nobody from the other side of the aisle rise to the
podium and say the majority leader should be here in Washington, D.C.,
carrying on and representing his district back home.
____________________