[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 14, 2003)]
[House]
[Page H4100]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS ARE GREATLY NEEDED
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Miller) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. MILLER of North Carolina. Mr. Speaker, 4 months ago as a brand-
new Member of this House, I stood with two of my Democratic colleagues
from North Carolina at the Employment Security Commission office in
Raleigh. And together we called on Congress to extend unemployment
benefits for an additional 26 weeks. At that time there were more than
37,000 workers who had already exhausted their unemployment benefits in
North Carolina and nationally a million workers were without benefits,
out of a job, out of money and because of the inaction of this House,
out of luck.
Despite my plea and the plea of other Democrats to extend the
benefits through a compromise plan that the Senate passed unanimously,
the House leadership allowed the benefits to expire and allowed 1
million Americans and their families to go without benefits. And there
was never an explanation for why this House could not trouble itself to
act quickly, to act in time to give that extension. A few days later
this House did act and extended benefits. It was not 26 weeks. It was
13. Again, no explanation for why we could not act in time.
Here we are again. With a deadline quickly approaching, the
Republican leadership is again doing nothing to extend those benefits.
On May 31, just a couple of weeks, this House will let unemployment
benefits expire again; but this time the impact will be far greater.
Now there are 2.1 million workers who will be left without unemployment
benefits. Twice as many in January, twice as many mothers and fathers,
twice as many breadwinners, twice as many out-of-luck Americans.
The economy has lost more than half a million additional jobs since
January. Since the recession began 2 years ago, the economy has lost
2.7 million jobs in the private sector. The persistence of job loss at
this 2-year mark in this recession is the worst since the Great
Depression. The unemployment rate is now 6 percent, and there are 8.8
million unemployed Americans. But again House Republicans are doing
nothing to protect out-of-work Americans and their families.
The Republican leadership has found the time to do plenty for
America's richest. The Republicans rammed the President's tax bill
through last week. If you listen to the Republicans speak in favor of
that bill, you would have thought you flipped from C-SPAN to the
History Channel. You would have thought you had gone back in time and
you were seeing House debates during the Great Depression or the Works
Progress Administration or the Civilian Conservation Corps, because
every Republican spoke entirely of creation of jobs. Only in passing
and only occasionally were Republicans speaking for the bill mentioned
that what the bill did was eliminate dividends, the taxation on
individuals of dividend, dividend income.
As the gentleman pointed out just a short while ago, we have heard
strained arguments before for how tax cuts solve a wide variety of
problems. The Republicans say that tax cuts to the rich are the
solution for everything from urban sprawl to tooth decay. Last week it
was the creation of jobs and economic stimulus. But the proposed
economic stimulus bill, or the bill described last week as an economic
stimulus bill, does little, precious little, to stimulate the economy.
They said that we need to cut taxes on the richest Americans so that
we can create what economists call the wealth effect; that the richest
Americans need to feel so secure in their financial circumstances that
they then will not feel inclined to save the money, but they will spend
it; and that will stimulate the economy.
{time} 1730
The unemployed may not feel rich, may not feel wealthy from getting
an extension of their unemployment benefits, but believe me, they will
spend it. I call it the got-to-pay-the-bills effect. They will spend
the money. They will spend it on their rent. They will spend it on
food. They will spend it on health care costs. They will spend the
money. Do not worry.
I do not favor, Mr. Speaker, an indefinite extension of unemployment
benefits, but I do not believe, as apparently the majority in this
Chamber do believe, that the majority of those who would be helped by
the extension of unemployment benefits would prefer not to be working.
If my colleagues think the unemployed are not looking for jobs because
unemployment benefits allows them a tax-paid holiday, I invite my
colleagues to come with me to Rockingham County. I would like to
introduce them to unemployed textile workers who do not know when they
will again find a job. They do not where to look for a job. I would
like to see my colleagues say to their face that we need to light a
fire under them so they will look for a job, and then, unless we end
their unemployment benefits, they will not look, they will not go and
find a job to support themselves and for their families.
I am proud to be here with many of my colleagues today, the first-
term members on the Democratic side, calling for an extension of those
benefits.
____________________