[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 14, 2003)]
[House]
[Page H4099]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE REST OF THE TEXAS REDISTRICTING STORY
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Texas (Mr. Barton) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. BARTON of Texas. Mr. Speaker, as Paul Harvey says in his radio
broadcasts, Let us hear the rest of the story.
My good friend from the State of Texas (Mr. Frost) from the 24th
district has been expounding on potentially how unfair that particular
redistricting plan that is pending before the Texas House is so I want
to talk about the rest of the story.
Back in 1980, the redistricting process was controlled by the
Democratic legislature in Austin as it should have been because they
were in the majority in both the Texas House and the Texas Senate. We
did have a Republican Governor at that time. I believe Governor
Clements . But the legislative process was dominated by the Democrats.
And a map that was put out had 27 congressional districts in it. And I
believe, I want to say four of them, four of the 27 elected
Republicans, when all the dust had settled, in at least one of those
districts was an upset; Congressman Jack Fields upset long-time
incumbent Democrat Bob Eckhardt down along the Houston ship channel
that was really drawn to be a Democratic district.
So we had a situation where Republicans were packed and the citizens
of Texas voted over 50 percent for Republican candidates. We had four
out of 27 seats in that particular redistricting process.
We rock along to 1990. In 1990 you had again a Democratic legislature
and a Democratic Governor this time, and Texas gained three more seats;
it went to 30 because of population growth. The next election about 55,
56 percent of the voters of Texas voted for Republican candidates, but
because of the lines that were drawn, nine Republicans got elected out
of 30, 30 percent were elected Republicans when we were voting 57
percent. That 27 percent Delta resulted in about nine congressional
seats, electing Democrats that if you had a little bit more fairer
lines would have elected Republicans.
Now we cannot stand here and tell you today on the floor of the House
of Representatives that some of those Democrats that got elected did
not deserve to get elected.
My good friend, the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Edwards), a good aggie
friend of mine, he won in the district that could have been marginally
called at least a swing district, but he did a good job. My good
friend, the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Hall), my good friend, the
gentleman from Texas (Mr. Stenholm), they are winning in districts that
are drawn to be Republican districts; and they are just doing a better
job or the Republican candidates just are not up to snuff. That is
fair. There is nothing wrong with that.
But when you have had two redistrictings done in 1980 and 1990 and it
is obvious that the mapmakers, because they were controlled by one
political party, which is fair, drew the districts to favor their
party. And then we come along to the year 2002, and we elect a
Republican House and a Republican Senate and a Republican Governor in
Texas. And in the congressional elections we support 57 percent
Republican candidates, and we still do not have over half the Congress
seats, it is fair to say we should redraw the lines. And that is what
the Texas legislature is trying to do right now.
I would say it is trying to do it on a bipartisan basis. No one can
tell me that Ron Wilson from Houston, Texas, an African American who is
chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of the Texas House is not a
Democrat. And he is part of this process where State Representative
Velma Luna, a Democrat, is helping to put this map together. So this is
not a Tom DeLay map or a Joe Barton map or even a Tom Craddick map. It
is a bipartisan map. It would elect two more Hispanics in all
probability. It would elect probably one more African American; and in
all probability, yes, it would elect more Republicans.
Would it elect 57 percent of the delegation to be Republican?
Probably not, because there are still going to be some Democratic
incumbent Congressmen who just do a good job, and their constituents
support the job they are doing, and they are going to elect them in the
districts that are drawn to be Republican. I do not have any problem
with that.
But to stand here and say, as some Members have said before me, that
what is happening in Austin is somehow unscrupulous or ill-towards or
ill-founded is just not the case. We are simply trying to get the
congressional districts to reflect the voting patterns of the State of
Texas. And that is a good thing and not a bad thing.
The legislators that are hiding out up in the Holiday Inn in Ardmore,
Oklahoma, it may be good PR, and it may be funny; but it is not what
they were elected to do.
They were elected to go to Austin and participate in the legislative
process, to win or lose based on where the votes are. I would remind my
friends that when the Republicans were in the minority in 1980 where
they did not have 50 Republicans in the legislature at that time, but
certainly they did in 1990, they did not bug out. They got beat on the
floor, but they stayed and fought. And I would hope later this evening
or sometime tomorrow enough people come to form a quorum. If that does
not happen, the likelihood is that some very good legislation is going
to die, the reorganization of State government which would save
hundreds of millions of dollars. The Governor will just call a special
session, and we will do this in a special session.
Mr. GREEN of Texas. Mr. Speaker, will the gentleman yield?
Mr. BARTON of Texas. I yield to the gentleman from Texas.
Mr. GREEN of Texas. Mr. Speaker, the gentleman and I are friends, and
we have worked together on a lot of issues and I thank you for
yielding.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman's time has expired.
Mr. GREEN of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I will have 5 minutes and this is a
time we might be able to exchange some ideas because I was there in
1981 and 1991, and I would be glad to talk about it.
____________________