[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 69 (Friday, May 9, 2003)]
[House]
[Pages H3964-H3965]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
ALLOW DEMOCRACY ON THE FLOOR OF THE HOUSE
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from New York (Mr. Engel) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. ENGEL. Mr. Speaker, we have seen many Democrats here speaking out
of a sense of frustration. The bill we voted on today is a bill of
tremendous importance, and yet all we had was one hour to debate this
bill. Many of us that wanted to come down and participate in the debate
could not even get one minute's time to debate this bill because the
Republicans kept a closed rule, which said there will be one hour of
debate, 30 minutes for each side, and no substitute allowed.
I did a little calculation. There are 435 Members of the House of
Representatives in this country, and if every one of us wanted to speak
on this bill with only one minute total time, that would leave each of
us a grand total of eight seconds each to speak on a bill worth
billions and billions and trillions of dollars. Surely our Founding
Fathers are rolling in their graves when they
[[Page H3965]]
see how the Republican majority has turned this House into an
undemocratic institution where the people who are elected by the people
cannot even have the ability to speak their minds.
We are fighting for democracy in Iraq, but we will not allow
democracy on the floor of the United States House of Representatives.
For shame.
The average American is not stupid. In fact, the average American is
very smart. The average American knows that when he or she has a budget
they must live within their budget. They make a certain amount of
money. They take home that money. They have to pay their bills with
that money, and they know that they cannot week in and week out spend
more than they take in. A person can do it for a while. They can charge
everything on their credit card for a while. They can keep paying
minimums on their credit card for a while, but sooner or later the
bubble is going to burst. That is what we are doing here in the United
States Congress.
My Republican friends talk a good game about balancing the budget and
a balanced budget amendment, and by the way, the balanced budget
amendment passed here in the House several years ago, failed by one
vote in the Senate, and the Republicans, despite having the majority in
both Houses, have not brought it up again.
The fact of the matter is that when Bill Clinton left office we had a
surplus of $200 billion per year, and now in two short years we have a
deficit of $400 billion per year, and these tax cuts, mainly for the
wealthy, will dig us deeper and deeper and deeper in a hole.
We are leaving our children and our grandchildren with a legacy of
debt. We are having an orgy now of tax cuts and saying to our future
generations, you pay the bill. We are going to walk away. We are going
to do things that are easy. Everyone likes a tax cut. Of course, a
majority of people favor the tax cuts. Everyone wants more money in
their pockets, but what are we doing to our children and our
grandchildren and the fiscal responsibility of this country?
The Republican leadership, the Republican majority here wants to do
this, in my estimation, deliberately. The ancillary benefits, giving
their rich friends a tax cut, is only an ancillary benefit. They want
to starve this government and make it impossible for there to be any
kind of program, entitlement programs like Social Security or Medicare
or Medicaid or education, for our children. They do not want it so a
balanced budget goes out the window. Deficits and deficits.
Let us take a quote from the gentleman from Texas (Mr. DeLay), the
current majority leader. This is what he said in 1995, ``By the year
2002, we can have a Federal Government with a balanced budget or we can
continue down the present path toward total fiscal catastrophe.'' That
was in 1995. I ask the majority leader and the people on the other side
of the aisle, what was true in 1995 is certainly true in 2003. We
cannot continue to run these deficits. We cannot continue to have this
kind of fiscal irresponsibility. The borrow and spend Republicans
cannot continue to lead this country down a path of fiscal
irresponsibility.
It is a disgrace that we now have to take to the floor of the House
after the bill has been voted on because we could not get the time to
talk before.
____________________