[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 56 (Tuesday, April 8, 2003)]
[House]
[Page H2868]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
CONCERNING THE CONFERENCE REPORT ON THE BUDGET RESOLUTION
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the order of the House of
January 7, 2003, the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Pallone) is
recognized during morning hour debates for 5 minutes.
Mr. PALLONE. Mr. Speaker, I rise on the floor to call attention to
the fiscal year 2004 budget resolution conference report and to express
my opposition to the inclusion of any Medicaid or Medicare cuts as part
of the final budget resolution.
Mr. Speaker, although the House-passed budget reconciliation contains
an instruction to cut the Medicaid program by $93 billion over 10
years, neither the Senate budget resolution nor the administration
budget includes such devastating cuts to the Medicaid program. As
Members know, the Medicaid program provides essential health coverage
to 47 million low-income children, working families, seniors and people
with disabilities. Moreover, this critical safety net program under
Medicare also contributes significantly to State economies by
stimulating employment and business activity which we cannot afford to
undermine.
States, Mr. Speaker, are currently facing the most severe budget
crisis since World War II and nearly every State has proposed or
enacted cuts in its Medicaid program. Any reduction in Federal Medicaid
funding would place millions of vulnerable Americans now receiving
Medicaid in jeopardy of losing their health insurance. Federal funding
reductions would force States to implement even deeper cuts by
restricting eligibility, eliminating or reducing critical health
benefits and severely cutting or freezing provider reimbursement rates.
As a result, Medicaid funding cuts would add millions more to the ranks
of the 41 million Americans that are already uninsured.
In addition, Mr. Speaker, I oppose inclusion in the budget of
sweeping mandatory cuts of potentially $75 billion over 10 years to the
Medicare program. Although the Republican budget on the surface level
appears to take a softer line on Medicare cuts as compared to Medicaid,
in fact the budget requires billions of dollars of mandatory program
cuts to the Medicare program. I will show my colleagues how. The budget
provides $400 billion in a reserve fund for Medicare reform. However,
the budget also instructs the Committee on Energy and Commerce to come
up with $107 billion that have to be in cuts to either Medicare,
Medicaid or S-CHIP, the kids' health insurance program, over 10 years
and also requires the Committee on Ways and Means to require $62
billion in cuts, some or all of which could fall on Medicare. So
although there is not an absolute requirement that it comes from
Medicare, because those two committees will not have many choices, we
are going to see Medicare cuts as well, as well as the mandatory
Medicaid cuts.
Mr. Speaker, while the budget resolution does not direct Medicare
cuts, I am very concerned because it does not preclude them and these
committees will be allowed to cut Medicare if that is what is required
to fulfill the reconciliation instructions. As a member of the
Committee on Energy and Commerce, I would do my best to prevent such
cuts from taking place because the effects would be devastating to the
structure and function of the Medicare program and, more importantly,
to the health of our seniors and disabled.
Again, Mr. Speaker, I have to express my strong opposition to the
inclusion of any Medicaid or Medicare cuts in the final budget
resolution. They will only mean that more people will be uninsured,
less health care services will be provided to a whole range of
individuals, and all this is being done basically so that the
Republicans can make more cuts for wealthy people, more tax cuts for
the wealthy, more tax cuts for corporate interests. It should not be
done at the expense of Medicare or Medicaid.
____________________